Drugmakers Are Abandoning Cheap Generics

By Arthur Allen, KFF Health News

On Nov. 22, three FDA inspectors arrived at the sprawling Intas Pharmaceuticals plant south of Ahmedabad, India, and found hundreds of trash bags full of shredded documents tossed into a garbage truck.

Over the next 10 days, the inspectors assessed what looked like a systematic effort to conceal quality problems at the plant, which provided more than half of the U.S. supply of generic cisplatin and carboplatin, two cheap drugs used to treat as many as 500,000 new cancer cases every year.

Seven months later, doctors and their patients are facing the unimaginable: In California, Virginia, and everywhere in between, they are being forced into grim contemplation of untested rationing plans for breast, cervical, bladder, ovarian, lung, testicular, and other cancers. Their decisions are likely to result in preventable deaths.

Cisplatin and carboplatin are among scores of drugs in shortage, including 12 other cancer drugs, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pills, blood thinners, antibiotics and opioids. Covid-hangover supply chain issues and limited FDA oversight are part of the problem, but the main cause, experts agree, is the underlying weakness of the generic drug industry.

Made mostly overseas, these old but crucial drugs are often sold at a loss or for little profit. Domestic manufacturers have little interest in making them, setting their sights instead on high-priced drugs with plump profit margins.

The problem isn’t new, and that’s particularly infuriating to many clinicians. President Joe Biden, whose son Beau died of an aggressive brain cancer, has focused his Cancer Moonshot on discovering cures — undoubtedly expensive ones. Indeed, existing brand-name cancer drugs often cost tens of thousands of dollars a year.

But what about the thousands of patients today who can’t get a drug like cisplatin, approved by the FDA in 1978 and costing as little as $6 a dose?

“It’s just insane,” said Mark Ratain, a cancer doctor and pharmacologist at the University of Chicago. “Your roof is caving in, but you want to build a basketball court in the backyard because your wife is pregnant with twin boys and you want them to be NBA stars when they grow up?”

“It’s just a travesty that this is the level of health care in the United States of America right now,” said Stephen Divers, an oncologist in Hot Springs, Arkansas, who in recent weeks has had to delay or change treatment for numerous bladder, breast, and ovarian cancer patients because his clinic cannot find enough cisplatin and carboplatin.

Results from a survey of academic cancer centers released June 7 found 93% couldn’t find enough carboplatin and 70% had cisplatin shortages.

“All day, in between patients, we hold staff meetings trying to figure this out,” said Bonny Moore, an oncologist in Fredericksburg, Virginia. “It’s the most nauseous I’ve ever felt. Our office stayed open during covid; we never had to stop treating patients. We got them vaccinated, kept them safe, and now I can’t get them a $10 drug.”

The 10 cancer clinicians KFF Health News interviewed for this story said that, given current shortages, they prioritize patients who can be cured over later-stage patients, in whom the drugs generally can only slow the disease, and for whom alternatives — though sometimes less effective and often with more side effects — are available. But some doctors are even rationing doses intended to cure.

Isabella McDonald, then a junior at Utah Valley University, was diagnosed in April with a rare, often fatal bone cancer, whose sole treatment for young adults includes the drug methotrexate. When Isabella’s second cycle of treatment began June 5, clinicians advised that she would be getting less than the full dose because of a methotrexate shortage, said her father, Brent.

“They don’t think it will have a negative impact on her treatment, but as far as I am aware, there isn’t any scientific basis to make that conclusion,” he said. “As you can imagine, when they gave us such low odds of her beating this cancer, it feels like we want to give it everything we can and not something short of the standard.”

Brent McDonald stressed that he didn’t blame the staffers at Intermountain Health who take care of Isabella. The family — his other daughter, Cate, made a TikTok video about her sister’s plight — were simply stunned at such a basic flaw in the health care system.

At Moore’s practice, in Virginia, clinicians gave 60% of the optimal dose of carboplatin to some uterine cancer patients during the week of May 16, then shifted to 80% after a small shipment came in the following week. The doctors had to omit carboplatin from normal combination treatments for patients with recurrent disease, she said.

ISABELLA MCDONALD AND HER FATHER, BRENT

On June 2, Moore and her colleagues were glued to their drug distributor’s website, anxious as teenagers waiting for Taylor Swift tickets to go on sale — only with mortal consequences at stake.

She later emailed KFF Health News: “Carboplatin did NOT come back in stock today. Neither did cisplatin.”

Doses remained at 80%, she said. Things hadn’t changed 10 days later.

Generics Manufacturers Are Pulling Out

The causes of shortages are well established. Everyone wants to pay less, and the middlemen who procure and distribute generics keep driving down wholesale prices. The average net price of generic drugs fell by more than half between 2016 and 2022, according to research by Anthony Sardella, a business professor at Washington University in St. Louis.

As generics manufacturers compete to win sales contracts with the big buyers, including wholesale purchasers Vizient and Premier, their profits sink. Some are going out of business. Akorn, which made 75 common generics, went bankrupt and closed in February.

Israeli generics giant Teva, which has a portfolio of 3,600 medicines, announced May 18 it was shifting to brand-name drugs and “high-value generics.” Teva notified the FDA earlier that month that it was discontinuing production of oxycodone tablets, a move that could exacerbate shortages of opioid pain medication.   

Lannett Co., with about 120 generics, announced a Chapter 11 reorganization amid declining revenue. Other companies are in trouble too, said David Gaugh, interim CEO of the Association for Accessible Medicines, the leading generics trade group.

The generics industry used to lose money on about a third of the drugs it produced, but now it’s more like half, Gaugh said. So when a company stops making a drug, others do not necessarily step up, he said.

Officials at Fresenius Kabi and Pfizer said they have increased their carboplatin production since March, but not enough to end the shortage. On June 2, FDA Commissioner Robert Califf announced the agency had given emergency authorization for Chinese-made cisplatin to enter the U.S. market, but the impact of the move wasn’t immediately clear.

Cisplatin and carboplatin are made in special production lines under sterile conditions, and expanding or changing the lines requires FDA approval. Bargain-basement prices have pushed production overseas, where it’s harder for the FDA to track quality standards. The Intas plant inspection was a relative rarity in India, where the FDA in 2022 reportedly inspected only 3% of sites that make drugs for the U.S. market.

Sardella, the Washington University professor, testified last month that a quarter of all U.S. drug prescriptions are filled by companies that received FDA warning letters in the past 26 months. And pharmaceutical industry product recalls are at their highest level in 18 years, reflecting fragile supply conditions. The FDA listed 137 drugs in shortage as of June 13, including many essential medicines made by few companies.

Intas voluntarily shut down its Ahmedabad plant after the FDA inspection, and the agency posted its shocking inspection report in January. Accord Healthcare, the U.S. subsidiary of Intas, said in mid-June it had no date for restarting production.

Asked why it waited two months after its inspection to announce the cisplatin shortage, given that Intas supplied more than half the U.S. market for the drug, the FDA said via email that it doesn’t list a drug in shortage until it has “confirmed that overall market demand is not being met.”

Prices for carboplatin, cisplatin, and other drugs have skyrocketed on the so-called gray market, where speculators sell medicines they snapped up in anticipation of shortages. A 600-milligram bottle of carboplatin, normally available for $30, was going for $185 in early May and $345 a week later, said Richard Scanlon, the pharmacist at Moore’s clinic.

“It’s hard to have these conversations with patients — ‘I have your dose for this cycle, but not sure about next cycle,’” said Mark Einstein, chair of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School.

Should Government Step In?

Despite a drug shortage task force and numerous congressional hearings, progress has been slow at best. The 2020 CARES Act gave the FDA the power to require companies to have contingency plans enabling them to respond to shortages, but the agency has not yet implemented guidance to enforce the provisions.

As a result, neither Accord nor other cisplatin makers had a response plan in place when Intas’ plant was shut down, said Soumi Saha, senior vice president of government affairs for Premier, which arranges wholesale drug purchases for more than 4,400 hospitals and health systems.

Premier understood in December that the shutdown endangered the U.S. supply of cisplatin and carboplatin, but it also didn’t issue an immediate alarm, she said. “It’s a fine balance,” she said. “You don’t want to create panic-buying or hoarding.”

More lasting solutions are under discussion. Sardella and others have proposed government subsidies to get U.S. generics plants running full time. Their capacity is now half-idle. If federal agencies like the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services paid more for more safely and efficiently produced drugs, it would promote a more stable supply chain, he said.

“At a certain point the system needs to recognize there’s a high cost to low-cost drugs,” said Allan Coukell, senior vice president for public policy at Civica Rx, a nonprofit funded by health systems, foundations, and the federal government that provides about 80 drugs to hospitals in its network. Civica is building a $140 million factory near Petersburg, Virginia, that will produce dozens more, Coukell said.

Ratain and his University of Chicago colleague Satyajit Kosuri recently called for the creation of a strategic inventory buffer for generic medications, something like the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, set up in 1975 in response to the OPEC oil crisis.

In fact, Ratain reckons, selling a quarter-million barrels of oil would probably generate enough cash to make and store two years’ worth of carboplatin and cisplatin.

“It would almost literally be a drop in the bucket.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Patients Who Received Opioids During Surgery Had Better Outcomes

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

As pressure grows on the Biden Administration to implement the NOPAIN Act and require Medicare to pay higher costs for non-opioid pain relievers during surgery, a new study shows that restricting the use of opioids during surgical procedures may do more harm than good.

Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) analyzed the health records of over 61,000 patients who had surgery under general anesthesia at MGH, and found that those who received opioids were less likely to experience post-operative pain and needed fewer opioids during recovery.

The study findings, published in in JAMA Surgery, showed that surgery patients who were given the opioids fentanyl and hydromorphone had less pain, lower rates of persistent opioid use, and fewer opioid prescription refills. They were also less likely to have chronic pain 12 months after surgery.

Researchers were particularly surprised to find that patients who received higher doses of fentanyl had fewer chronic pain diagnoses and needed fewer opioid prescriptions 30, 90 and 180 days after surgery.

“We were surprised by the extent to which intraoperative administration of opioids was associated with medium- and long-term outcomes. This may relate to the fact that if inadequate amounts of opioids are administered in the operating room, patients may emerge from general anesthesia in pain, a phenomenon that has a known association with persistent postsurgical pain,” wrote lead author Patrick Purdon, PhD, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine at MGH.

“The main implication of this study is that in the drive toward overall reduction of opioid usage in surgical pain management in the US, the role of intraoperative nociception in determining postoperative pain may have been overlooked to the detriment of patient outcomes.”

Researchers say their findings underscore the importance of ensuring that patients don’t emerge from general anesthesia in pain, not only for their short-term wellbeing, but to prevent long-term opioid use.

“The opioid crisis is a major motivator for mitigating the risks of opioid usage,” said co–first author Laura Santa Cruz Mercado, MD, an anesthesiology resident at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and former research fellow at MGH. “But appropriate opioid administration in the operating room may reduce total opioid usage after surgery.”

Lobbying for Early Implementation of NOPAIN

Although previous studies have found that the risk of opioid misuse or overdose after surgery is rare, pressure on U.S. hospitals to reduce their use of opioids has resulted in a 50% decrease in opioid prescribing after surgery.  

Supporters of the NOPAIN Act would like it to decrease further and faster. Passed by Congress late last year, the Act requires the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to expand reimbursement policies for non-opioid treatments in outpatient surgical settings, starting in 2025. Supporters of the bill have launched a campaign to have the timetable moved up to 2024.

“Healthcare leaders must help CMS understand the inevitable damage that will result if the agency does not implement the policy in 2024. Millions of Americans will be put needlessly at risk of opioid addiction for another year,” Nirav Amin, MD, an orthopedic surgeon at Pomona Valley Hospital in Pomona, CA, wrote in a recent op/ed in Healthcare Dive. “The policy will incentivize greater use of non-opioids by creating separate reimbursements for the administration of these therapies.”

Unmentioned in Amin’s column is that he’s been paid over $360,000 in recent years as a consultant for Pacira BioSciences, a company that stands to directly benefit from the NOPAIN Act. Pacira makes Exparel, an expensive injectable formulation of bupivacaine, a non-opioid analgesic used to treat post-operative pain.

Bupivacaine is a generic drug that only costs about $35 a vial, while Exparel is priced 10 times higher, at $365 a vial. According to two recent studies that Pacira claimed were “false and misleading,” Exparel works no better than the much cheaper bupivacaine products.

Pacira has made over $32 million in various payments to Amin and other doctors to help promote Exparel, according to Open Payments, a CMS database that tracks industry payments to healthcare providers. Pacira is also bankrolling Voices for Non-Opioid Choices, an advocacy group that is leading the campaign for early implementation of the NOPAIN Act.

Pacira is also very active politically, spending over $2.6 million on lobbying and campaign donations since 2018, according to OpenSecrets. In 2019, Pacira hired former New Jersey governor and current presidential candidate Chris Christie as a consultant for $800,000 and lucrative stock options. At the time, Christie had recently chaired President Trump’s opioid commission, which recommended that Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement policies be changed to encourage hospitals to use more non-opioid pain relievers.

Chemotherapy and Opioid Shortages Impacting Cancer Care

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Over two-thirds of cancer centers in the U.S. are reporting shortages of methotrexate and other drugs used in chemotherapy, according to a survey by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN).

Methotrexate is a versatile drug that prevents cells from dividing. It was originally developed to treat cancer, but is also widely used to treat autoimmune and neurological conditions such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, migraine and multiple sclerosis.

The NCNN surveyed 27 cancer centers across the U.S. in late May, and found that 67% of them were reporting shortages of methotrexate. Most centers are also reporting chronic shortages of carboplatin and cisplatin, chemotherapy agents that are widely used in cancer treatment. The shortages have resulted in treatment delays or forced doctors to modify their treatment plans using other drugs.

"This is an unacceptable situation. We are hearing from oncologists and pharmacists across the country who have to scramble to find appropriate alternatives for treating their patients with cancer right now," Robert Carlson, MD, CEO of NCCN, said in a statement. "We were relieved by survey results that show patients are still able to get life-saving care, but it comes at a burden to our overtaxed medical facilities." 

Drugs shortages in the U.S. are currently near record levels, primarily due to shipping delays and other disruptions caused by the pandemic. But the shortage in chemotherapy agents largely stems from a halt in production at a plant in India operated by Intas Pharmaceuticals. FDA inspectors found quality-control violations at the plant late last year and the agency recently slapped an import alert on the company. The agency is working with drug makers in China to make up the difference.

The FDA added methotrexate injectable solution to its drug shortage list in March. Supplies are currently limited and the shortage is not expected to end until December 2023. No shortages are currently reported for methotrexate tablets.

Hydrocodone Shortage

In addition to chemotherapy drugs, some drug makers are also reporting shortages of opioid pain medication. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) recently added hydrocodone-acetaminophen combinations – commonly known under the brand names Vicodin and Norco-- to its own drug shortage database.

Generic drug makers Amneal, Camber, KVK-Tech, Major and Rhodes currently report shortages of 5 mg, 7.5 mg, and 10 mg hydrocodone tablets. None of the companies provided a reason for the shortage or an estimate for when it might end. Many of the same drug makers reported shortages of oxycodone in March.

The limited supply of opioids is also affecting cancer patients. The University of Utah Health system recently informed its drug wholesaler that it was adding 50 new beds to its cancer clinic and would be needing more pain medication to treat the extra patients.

“And the wholesaler said, ‘Well, let's just wait until we start receiving your orders to increase the amounts that you're going to buy,’” said Erin Fox, PharmD, Senior Pharmacy Director at University of Utah Health, which tracks drug shortages for the ASHP. “We're unable to be proactive. We're trying to think ahead. And we don't want to have that situation where we we're getting very close to running out or not having enough. That's basically what our wholesaler says has to happen.”

“We wish that we could fix all these things, but we don't make the medicines and we can't tell someone that they must make medicines. There are some things that are out of our control,” FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said in a recent interview with Medscape.

The Drug Enforcement Administration, in consultation with the FDA, sets the annual production quotas for opioids and other controlled substances. The DEA reduced this year’s supply of oxycodone and hydrocodone by about 5 percent, after being advised by FDA that demand for Schedule II opioids would decline. Since peaking a decade ago, DEA production quotas have fallen by 65% for oxycodone and 73% for hydrocodone.

FDA Head Says Drug Shortages ‘Out of Our Control’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

With drug shortages in the U.S. near record levels, the head of the Food and Drug Administration says there is little his agency can do to ease shortages, particularly those involving generic drugs.

“We wish that we could fix all these things, but we don't make the medicines and we can't tell someone that they must make medicines. There are some things that are out of our control,” FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, said in an interview with Medscape.  

There are currently 207 medications in short supply, according to the FDA’s drug shortage list, but the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has a much higher estimate of over 300 active drug shortages, the most since 2014.

Shortages of generic medications used to treat cancer and attention deficit disorder (ADHD) have gotten the most attention, but there are also emerging shortages of generic oxycodone and other opioid pain medications. About 90% of prescribed drugs in the U.S. are low-cost generics.

“And this has caused a big problem, where a number of generic drugs are in shortage at any given time, because there's not enough profit for a company to say they want to go into the business of making that drug,” said Califf.

Teva Pharmaceutical, one of the world’s largest manufacturers of generic drugs, announced last month that it would change its business model to focus on more profitable branded drugs. Teva has already informed the FDA that it was discontinuing production of 30, 15, and 5 mg tablets of generic oxycodone.  

Another generic drug maker, Perrigo Pharmaceuticals, recently notified the FDA that it was stopping production of a cough syrup made with hydrocodone.

Pain patients have had trouble for years getting prescriptions filled for opioids, but the problem appears to have gotten more acute in recent months – and not just for generic opioids. Joy CobbWilliams told PNN she has trouble getting prescriptions filled for OcyContin, a branded formulation of oxycodone that she’s been taking for nearly a decade for chronic back pain.

“Month after month I run out of my medication while I wait for the pharmacy to get more. Some months I wait three or four days and other months I wait almost two weeks. The pain I suffer is unbearable,” she said. “Something needs to be done. We have got to do better for the patients suffering and not abusing the medication. This is the United States and there should be no reason someone suffering should have to wait days to weeks to get their 10mg OxyContin.” 

Kim Luarks told us she’s had problems with her pharmacy running out of fentanyl patches and Xtampza ER (oxycodone). She’s been on opioids for 20 years due to chronic back pain. 

“Here I sit, still waiting and have been without any long-acting opioid for (7 days) and not feeling too hot,” she said. “This could be detrimental to my life, let alone my heart and lungs that are already damaged due to the doctors just throwing pain meds at me in the early 2000’s. I've been through all the changes and federal regulations causing this nonsense.” 

The Drug Enforcement Administration, in consultation with the FDA, determines the annual production quotas for opioids and other controlled substances. Despite Califf’s contention that drug shortages are “out of our control,” it was the FDA that advised the DEA that demand for Schedule II opioids such as oxycodone would fall by 5.3% in 2023. 

DEA adopted the FDA’s recommendations and reduced the supply of opioids for the seventh consecutive year, saying it would be “sufficient to meet all legitimate needs.” Since their peak in 2013, DEA production quotas have fallen by 65% for oxycodone and 73% for hydrocodone.

In his interview with Medscape, Califf suggested that some medications are now in short supply not because of production quotas, but because they are prescribed to people who don’t really need them. He said stronger medical guidelines may be needed to discourage doctors from overprescribing.   

“If only the people that needed these drugs got them, there probably wouldn't be a shortage. There's a large amount of use which is on the margins. And this is why I say we need better clinical standards,” Califf said.

“But having said all that, we're working with the DEA frequently as they try to work out what the quotas are. And we're working with the companies to optimize production. So that shortage should go away. It's better now than it was a few months ago, and it's going to continue to get better.”

Studying Natural Opioids Could Lead to New Non-Addictive Analgesics

By Dr. John Streicher, University of Arizona

Opioid drugs such as morphine and fentanyl are like the two-faced Roman god Janus: The kindly face delivers pain relief to millions of sufferers, while the grim face drives an opioid abuse and overdose crisis that claimed nearly 70,000 lives in the U.S. in 2020 alone.

Scientists like me who study pain and opioids have been seeking a way to separate these two seemingly inseparable faces of opioids. Researchers are trying to design drugs that deliver effective pain relief without the risk of side effects, including addiction and overdose.

One possible path to achieving that goal lies in understanding the molecular pathways opioids use to carry out their effects in your body.

What Are Natural Opioids?

The opioid system in your body is a set of neurotransmitters your brain naturally produces that enable communication between neurons and activate protein receptors. These neurotransmitters include small protein-like molecules like enkephalins and endorphins. These molecules regulate a tremendous number of functions in your body, including pain, pleasure, memory, the movements of your digestive system, and more.

Opioid neurotransmitters activate receptors that are located in a lot of places in your body, including pain centers in your spinal cord and brain, reward and pleasure centers in your brain, and throughout the neurons in your gut. Normally, opioid neurotransmitters are released in only small quantities in these exact locations, so your body can use this system in a balanced way to regulate itself.

The problem comes when you take an opioid drug like morphine or fentanyl, especially at high doses, for a long time. These drugs travel through the bloodstream and can activate every opioid receptor in your body. You’ll get pain relief through the pain centers in your spinal cord and brain. But you’ll also get a euphoric high when those drugs hit your brain’s reward and pleasure centers, and that could lead to addiction with repeated use. When the drug hits your gut, you may develop constipation, along with other common opioid side effects.

Targeting Opioid Signals

How can scientists design opioid drugs that won’t cause side effects?

One approach my research team and I take is to understand how cells respond when they receive a message from an opioid neurotransmitter. Neuroscientists call this process opioid receptor signal transduction. Just as neurotransmitters are a communication network within your brain, each neuron also has a communication network that connects receptors to proteins within the neuron.

When these connections are made, they trigger specific effects like pain relief. So, after a natural opioid neurotransmitter or a synthetic opioid drug activates an opioid receptor, it activates proteins within the cell that carry out the effects of the neurotransmitter or the drug.

Opioid signal transduction is complex, and scientists are just starting to figure out how it works. However, one thing is clear: Not every protein involved in this process does the same thing. Some are more important for pain relief, while some are more important for side effects like respiratory depression or the decrease in breathing rate that makes overdoses fatal.

So what if we target the “good” signals like pain relief and avoid the “bad” signals that lead to addiction and death? Researchers are tackling this idea in different ways. In fact, in 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first opioid drug based on this idea, oliceridine, as a painkiller with fewer respiratory side effects.

However, relying on just one drug has downsides. That drug might not work well for all people or for all types of pain. It could also have other side effects that show up only later on. Plenty of options are needed to treat all patients in need.

Inhibiting a Protein Relieves Pain

My research team is targeting a protein called Heat shock protein 90, or Hsp90, which has many functions inside each cell. Hsp90 has been a hot target in the cancer field for years, with researchers developing Hsp90 inhibitors as a treatment for many cancer types.

We’ve found that Hsp90 is also really important in regulating opioid signal transduction. Blocking Hsp90 in the brain blocked opioid pain relief. However, blocking Hsp90 in the spinal cord increased opioid pain relief. Our recently published work uncovered more details on exactly how inhibiting Hsp90 leads to increased pain relief in the spinal cord.

Our work shows that manipulating opioid signaling through Hsp90 offers a path forward to improve opioid drugs. Taking an Hsp90 inhibitor that targets the spinal cord along with an opioid drug could improve the pain relief the opioid provides while decreasing its side effects. With improved pain relief, you can take fewer opioids and reduce your risk of addiction. We are currently developing a new generation of Hsp90 inhibitors that could help realize this goal.

There may be many paths to developing an improved opioid drug without the burdensome side effects of current drugs like morphine and fentanyl. Separating the kindly and grim faces of the opioid Janus could help provide the pain relief we need without addiction and overdose. 

John Streicher, PhD, is an Associate Professor in the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Arizona. Dr. Streicher has published over 70 peer-reviewed articles and is engaged in numerous drug discovery campaigns to create new analgesics. He receives funding from the National Institutes of Health, the Arizona Biomedical Research Commission, the Flinn Foundation, and the University of Arizona.

This article originally appeared in The Conversation and is republished with permission.

My Life Is on the Line Due to Rx Opioid Shortages

By Christine Kucera, Guest Columnist

On May 24, I had my regularly scheduled pain management appointment. The prescription for my normal regimen of 10mg oxycodone was sent electronically to my local CVS pharmacy. About an hour later, I received a text from CVS saying they received the prescription from my doctor.

I followed up later through their automated system. That is the moment of shocking revelation when I learned that my prescription was not going to be filled on time, and that it may not be ready until a week after my fill date.

Utterly panicked, heart racing, thinking and speaking a mile a minute, I contacted the pharmacy. They confirmed they were out of 10mg oxycodone tablets.

“What am I supposed to do?” I asked. A woman who I don’t know replied that I should try contacting other pharmacies.

Really? I can’t do that. Pharmacies won’t tell me, the patient, if they have a supply of a controlled substance. So she looked it up and said it looks like “X” pharmacy has it and that I should have my doctor send the prescription there. Unfortunately, by the time my provider received the message, it was too late.

I made multiple calls to another pharmacy and they were extremely rude. I called my pharmacy again. This time I spoke with a pharmacist that knew me. He was very understanding, as we discussed what to do next.

CHRISTINE KUCERA

We came up with a plan. He said to have my doctor send him a prescription for 5mg oxycodone. I immediately emailed my provider about the shortage and asked him to send a new prescription for 5mg, since they were out of 10mg tablets.

It was a very long night and I was extremely anxious waiting for a reply from my provider. As a long-term opioid patient of 30 years with intractable pain, I’ve been through the unimaginable, especially after the CDC published its first opioid guideline. Since 2016, I’ve been force tapered to suboptimal treatment levels, denied pain medication during multiple hospitalizations, and told to take Tylenol.

A surgeon even used prescription fentanyl on me during an interventional procedure after being told it doesn’t work on me – leaving me awake and screaming during the procedure. That’s just to name a few examples. Believe me, there are many more.

My thoughts are racing out of control. I can’t do this anymore. I can’t live life with unrelenting, unmanaged pain all day, every day. I’m barely holding on now, trying hard not give up hope. It’s not easy living in a body that’s under assault from an invisible invader, leaving my entire body riddled with rare diseases, along with severe bone, nerve, connective tissue and organ pain.

As a person with severe medically induced PTSD, I can fully recall all of the previous times I was forced off my managed regime of opiate medication. This time it’s going to be at the hands of the DEA, which has intentionally created shortages of oxycodone.

Next day arrives, a new prescription for 5mg is sent and I sigh with relief. It was short lived. Another pharmacist said my insurance company won’t cover the 5mg substitute without prior authorization. Completely losing control of my emotions, I asked why do I need another prior authorization?  My daily limit of 90 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) didn’t change, just the dose of the tablets

“It’s because of daily quantity limits,” the pharmacist replied.

Are you freaking serious?  I’m out of oxycodone as of today and you’re saying I can’t have 2 weeks of a substitute because there is no supply anywhere of 10mg and my insurance has quantity limits on 5mg doses?  I was angry and upset. This is so wrong! What am I supposed to do?

To that, the pharmacist says, “You can pay out of pocket.”

I didn’t have a choice, although I knew what happens from paying out of pocket with cash and sending prescriptions to new pharmacies. Those are red flags for prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs).

What’s next CDC and DEA? You’ve fabricated the great Opioid Lie and created policies that affect all pain care in all settings. Created new burdens for disabled and chronically ill patients. Created an opioid guideline that doesn’t allow for individualized treatment and places limits on prescriptions. You’ve shackled doctors with no options but to provide inadequate pain care or abandon patients altogether.

Now patients and their providers are having to deal with DEA created shortages of essential medicines. This has got to stop! Pain patients have never been the driver behind the overdose crisis. Anti-opioid prohibition policies are harming, torturing and killing U.S. citizens.

What do I do? There are no protections or even a set of procedures in place to assist patients and providers when there are shortages of controlled substances. It really is a nightmare situation. I feel helpless. The shortage is not my fault, the restrictions have gone too far, and my life is on the line.

Christine Kucera lives with psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthropy, spondylitis, polyarthritis, sacroiliitis, degenerative joint disease, dermatomyositis, mixed connective tissue disease, spinal radiculopathy, hypoparathyroidism, rare endocrine tumors, psoriasis, endometriosis stage IV, pelvic adhesive disease, and other painful conditions. 

Prior to becoming disabled, Christine was a healthcare research systems developer and analyst for federally funded CMS, AHRQ, and NIH grants and programs. 

Do you have a “My Story” to share? Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories about living with pain and treating it. We are particularly interested in your experiences dealing with current drug shortages. Send your stories to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

Drug Distributor Vows to Fight DEA

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The fourth-largest drug distributor in the U.S. is vowing to fight efforts by the Drug Enforcement Administration to strip it of its license to sell opioids and other controlled substances to pharmacies, hospitals and health systems in 27 states.

Such a move by the DEA, if carried out, would not only put Morris & Dickson out of business but could exacerbate already tight supplies of pain medication and drugs used to treat cancer and attention deficit disorder (ADHD). The company said it would “vigorously appeal” the license revocation and seek a stay in federal court.

“We strongly believe any attempt to revoke our registration would be unwarranted and unjustified. Most importantly, any decision the DEA makes will not disrupt our operations. Business will continue as usual, and orders will continue to go out on time,” the Louisiana-based company said in a statement on its website.

The DEA announced Friday that it would revoke Morris & Dickson’s license, but allowed 90 days before the order takes effect. The action stems from a DEA investigation that identified thousands of suspiciously large orders for oxycodone and hydrocodone that the company sold to independent pharmacies in Louisiana from 2014 to 2018. In some cases, according to the DEA, the pharmacies were allowed to purchase six times the amount of opioids that they would normally order.

The DEA suspended Morris & Dickson’s license in 2018, but then delayed making a final decision on revoking it, which allowed the company to continue to operate. That five year delay came to a sudden end this week, after the Associated Press reported that the DEA failed to stop the company from “shipping highly addictive painkillers,” even after a judge recommended that its license be revoked for its “cavalier disregard” of the suspicious orders.

Further complicating the case is that a top DEA official retired from the agency in 2017 and went to work for Morris & Dickson, leading efforts at the company to improve the way it identifies and reports suspicious orders. Louis Milione “unretired” in 2021 and went back to work at the DEA as principal deputy administrator.    

Morris & Dickson spent millions of dollars improving its compliance system, but that was not enough for DEA Administrator Ann Milgram, who has come under increasing fire for her personnel decisions at the agency.

“Respondent (Morris & Dickson) has not adequately convinced the Agency that it can be entrusted with a registration — its acceptance of responsibility did not prove that it or its principals understand the full extent of their wrongdoing, the effect that it had on the Agency and the American public, and the potential harm that it caused. It was Respondent's burden to prove that it could be entrusted to protect the public interest in maintaining a DEA registration — and it has failed to do so,” Milgram said in her 68-page order.

Milgram said she would deny any application by Morris & Dickson to renew or modify its registration, and said her order would become final on August 28, 2023.

The company, however, said it would continue its “ongoing discussion” with the DEA to keep its license.

“Morris & Dickson is grateful to the DEA Administrator for delaying the effective date of the Order to allow time to settle these old issues, which has been our goal since this started years ago,” the company said. “We remain confident we can achieve an outcome that safeguards the supply chain for all of our healthcare partners and the communities they serve.”

That supply chain has been severely strained in recent years, not only by the pandemic, but by DEA actions that reduced the supply of opioids and other controlled substances.

In March, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists added oxycodone to its list of drug shortages, after generic drug makers Amneal, Camber and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals reported they were running out of some doses of oxycodone tablets.

This month Teva Pharmaceutical said it would discontinue production of immediate release oxycodone and scale back its generic drug business to focus on more profitable medications.

The nation’s three largest drug distributors – McKesson, AmerisourceBergen and Cardinal Health — have already imposed strict limits on the amount of opioids and other controlled substances they sell as part of a $21 billion opioid litigation settlement. Whether they would be able to take on additional customers and supply them with essential medications that Morris & Dickson now provides is an open question.

“It’s hard to say what the overall impact would be. I don’t know how many pharmacies or hospitals are only serviced by Morris & Dickson,” says Erin Fox, PharmD, Senior Pharmacy Director at University of Utah Health, who has been tracking drug shortages for over 20 years. “They would have to establish contracts with another wholesaler. If pharmacies and hospitals have a secondary wholesaler, then they should be able to access opioids to dispense for patients.”  

Why Changes at Teva Could Worsen Rx Opioid Shortages

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A change in the business model of one of the world’s largest manufacturers of generic drugs could lead to further shortages of opioids and other medications in the United States, according to an industry expert.

Last week Israel-based Teva Pharmaceutical Industries said it would reduce its production of generics from 80% of its drug portfolio to 60% over the next few years. Teva’s CEO says the company plans to focus on more profitable branded drugs as part of its “pivot to growth.”

“The drugs we’re pulling out of are drugs which are low-margin,” CEO Richard Francis told Bloomberg.

Teva has not publicly identified which generic drugs it will stop producing, but said it would “very carefully” avoid dropping any medications that are already in short supply.

“We don’t want to let the pharmacists, the wholesalers and the patients down. We want to make sure they always have their drug when they’re looking for it,” Francis said in an interview with Endpoints News.

But Teva has already moved to reduce its production of generic oxycodone, informing the Food and Drug Administration earlier this month that it would discontinue producing 30, 15, and 5 mg tablets of immediate release oxycodone. Teva did not respond to multiple requests from PNN to explain the reasons for the discontinuation.

The FDA does not currently list oxycodone on its drug shortage database, but the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) does.

As PNN reported, ASHP added oxycodone to its nationwide list of drug shortages in March, with generic drug makers Amneal, Camber and Rhodes Pharmaceuticals reporting shortages of 5, 15, 20 and 30 mg oxycodone tablets.

“They are a large producer and other companies may not be able to make up the difference. I think it really will result in shortages.”

— Dr. Erin Fox, University of Utah Health

“I know that (Teva’s) CEO came out with a statement saying that they wouldn't leave the market for products that are in short supply, but it hasn't exactly been a great market overall. The overall capacity of just the generic market is very difficult. When you look at controlled substances, that gets even more difficult,” says Erin Fox, PharmD, Senior Pharmacy Director at University of Utah Health, which tracks drug shortages for the ASHP.

“They (Teva) are a large producer and other companies may not be able to make up the difference. I think it really will result in shortages.”

As an example of how tight the supply of opioids and other controlled substances is, Fox says the University of Utah Health system reached out to its drug wholesaler to let them know that it was adding 50 new beds to its cancer clinic and would be needing more pain medication and other drugs to treat the extra patients. The answer it received was not reassuring.

“It's mostly opioids that we anticipate needing more of. And the wholesaler said, ‘Well, let's just wait until we start receiving your orders to increase the amounts that you're going to buy,’” Fox told PNN. “I think the wholesalers’ settlement that they've done has really limited the amount of products that pharmacies can access. Even if you have the patients, it can be very difficult to increase the amount that you're ordering.”

Fox is referring to a $21 billion opioid litigation settlement that three large drug distributors reached with 46 states last year, which requires them to impose strict limits on the amount of opioids and other controlled substances they can supply to pharmacies in any given month. An unusually large order for opioids could result in a pharmacy getting red-flagged by a distributor and the order cancelled, regardless of patient needs.

“We're unable to be proactive. We're trying to think ahead. And we don't want to have that situation where we we're getting very close to running out or not having enough. That's basically what our wholesaler says has to happen,” Fox explained.

DEA Production Cuts

Fox says years of cuts in production quotas by the Drug Enforcement Administration have also contributed to shortages. With opioids and some other controlled substances in tight supply, there is little margin for error or unexpected developments in the pharmaceutical industry – like Teva reducing its production of generics.

Keeping track of the drug supply is made more difficult because production quotas for each company are not disclosed by the DEA and there is little transparency in the business.

“What we don't have is the amount that the DEA is giving to each supplier. And then we also don't know the amount that each supplier is then manufacturing. Because we don't have that transparency, it's really hard to know,” Fox said. “Drug manufacturing is a business. And even though patients are at the end of it, these drug companies don't have to tell people why they're discontinuing something. They don't have to have to say what market share they had or if they think there might be a shortage. They can just stop at any time.”

Another issue is that DEA’s annual production quotas are not transferable from one company to another. That’s why Fox believes the changes at Teva are likely to worsen drug shortages.

“DEA assumes that everything is going perfectly with manufacturing, that no companies are having a glitch, and no companies are having a problem. And so one company might be having manufacturing problems, but still holding onto their quota. They can't necessarily give it to another company who's able to ramp up production,” she said.

“There’s just a lack of transparency. It's very hard. I've been monitoring drug shortages for over 20 years. Almost always, when a company quits, we end up with some kind of a shortage. Hopefully it won't be long term.”

Another factor that could be influencing Teva’s decision is the $4.25 billion nationwide settlement the company agreed to pay in opioid litigation last year. Teva’s production of generic and branded opioids dwarfed that of Purdue Pharma and other better known drug companies. Now heavily in debt, Teva may have decided that profits in a low-margin product like opioids are simply not worth the risk.      

‘No Reliable Evidence’ That Antidepressants Work for Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Medical guidelines in the United States and United Kingdom may recommend antidepressants for treating chronic pain, but there is “no reliable evidence” that the medications actually work for that purpose, according to a new Cochrane review.

Cochrane reviews are considered the gold standard in medical research because they use robust methodology to gather good quality evidence, while dismissing poor quality research.

A team of UK researchers, led by scientists at the University of Southampton, spent two years examining 176 clinical trials involving nearly 30,000 patients who were prescribed antidepressants for pain. Among the drugs studied were fluoxetine (Prozac), sertraline (Zoloft), amitriptyline (Elavil), milnacipran (Savella), citalopram (Celexa), paroxetine (Paxil) and duloxetine (Cymbalta).

“Our review found no reliable evidence for the long-term efficacy of any antidepressant, and no reliable evidence for their safety for chronic pain at any point. Though we did find that duloxetine provided short-term pain relief for patients we studied, we remain concerned about its possible long-term harm due to the gaps in current evidence,” said lead author Tamar Pincus, PhD, a Psychology Professor at the University of Southampton.

“This is a global public health concern. Chronic pain is a problem for millions who are prescribed antidepressants without sufficient scientific proof they help, nor an understanding of the long-term impact on health.”

In the United States, duloxetine is FDA-approved for fibromyalgia, diabetic neuropathy and musculoskeletal pain. The recently updated CDC guideline recommends that duloxetine and other SNRI antidepressants be used for fibromyalgia and neuropathy, because they provide “small to moderate improvements in chronic pain and function.”

The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline goes even further, stating that antidepressants are better than opioids and other analgesics in treating fibromyalgia, chronic headache, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), musculoskeletal pain and other types of “primary chronic pain” for which there is no known cause.   

The authors of the Cochrane review say regulators in the US and UK should reconsider their recommendations.

“We are calling on governing health bodies NICE and the FDA to update their guidelines to reflect the new scientific evidence, and on funders to stop supporting small and flawed trials. Evidence synthesis is often complex and nuanced but the evidence underpinning the use of these treatments is not equivalent, so current treatment modalities are hard to justify,” said co-author Gavin Stewart, PhD, a statistician at Newcastle University.

Amitriptyline is one of the most commonly prescribed antidepressants for chronic pain in the world. In the last year, around 10 million prescriptions for amitriptyline were given to patients in England for pain, about twice the number prescribed for depression. Many other antidepressants are also prescribed “off-label” for pain, despite limited evidence to support their use.

“Though previous investigations show that some antidepressants might relieve pain, there has never been a comprehensive study examining all medications across all chronic conditions – until now,” said co-author Hollie Birkinshaw, PhD, a Research Associate at the University of Southampton.

“The only reliable evidence is for duloxetine. Adopting a person-centered approach is critical to treatment and, when patients and clinicians decide together to try antidepressants, they should start from the drug for which there is good evidence.”

The reviewers say duloxetine was the highest-rated antidepressant for treating fibromyalgia, musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. Standard doses of duloxetine were just as effective as higher ones. Milnacipran was also effective at reducing pain, although the evidence was weaker.

“We simply cannot tell about other antidepressants because sufficiently good studies are not available – but it does not mean that people should stop taking prescribed medication without consulting their GP,” said Pincus.

A common complaint of patients who take duloxetine is that it makes them dizzy and nauseous. Many quickly become dependent on the drug and then have severe withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking it.

Several previous studies have also raised questions about using antidepressants for pain. A recent review of over two dozen clinical trials by Australian researchers found little evidence to support the use of antidepressants in pain management. Nearly half of the trials had ties or funding from the pharmaceutical industry.

What Kind of Pain Care Would JFK Get Today?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

This year marks the 60th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, an event that shocked the world. Kennedy was only 46 when he died in 1963.

At the time, Kennedy was widely seen as a healthy, handsome and vigorous man. The truth, which emerged years later, is that JFK was chronically ill almost from birth. Scarlet fever nearly killed him as an infant, and as a child he was thin, sickly, and suffered from chronic infections and digestive problems.

Not until decades after his death did we learn that Kennedy was born with an autoimmune condition called polyglandular syndrome, and that a series of failed back surgeries may have led to adhesive arachnoiditis, a chronic and painful inflammation in his spinal canal. Historians and physicians also confirmed rumors that JFK suffered from Addison’s Disease, a well-guarded family secret.

Kennedy was given the last rites at least twice before becoming president and reportedly told his father that he would “rather be dead” than spend the rest of his life on crutches, paralyzed by pain.

In short, it’s a bit of miracle that JFK even lived to see his 46th birthday. The American public never had a full understanding of his health problems until long after he was dead.

How did Kennedy pull it off? The answers can be found in Dr. Forest Tennant’s latest book, “The Strange Medical Saga of John F. Kennedy.”

“The reason I decided to write it was mainly that I had become aware that he was an intractable pain patient,” says Tennant, a retired physician and one the world’s foremost experts on arachnoiditis and intractable pain. “Fundamentally, my book is really taking a lot of other people's work and putting it together in a historical chronological fashion. I just felt it needs to be done to really understand what happened to him.”

Although Kennedy’s chronic health problems were largely hidden from the public, many of his medical records still exist – a reflection of his family’s wealth and access to the best medical care available. Good doctors keep good medical records, especially when their patients are rich and famous.

“Until I got into doing this, it was not appreciated by me. Unless a person is very famous and has a lot of medical records, physicians never get to see a case from start to finish. Meaning from birth to death. I've never really realized how rare that is,” says Tennant.

A Controversial Drug Cocktail

In the mid 1950’s, Kennedy found a team of innovative medical experts who helped relieve his pain, elect him as president, and achieve his best health ever while living in the White House.

Dr. Max Jacobson put Kennedy on a controversial “performance enhancing” cocktail. The ingredients were secret, but Tennant says the cocktail probably included methamphetamine, hormones, vitamins and steroids.

Exhausted from months of campaigning, Kennedy was injected with the cocktail just hours before his first debate with Richard Nixon, a nationally televised debate that likely won the election for Kennedy because he appeared more energetic than Nixon.

Kennedy continued taking the cocktail as president, over the objections of White House physicians.

High Dose Opioids

Dr. Janet Travell also played a key role in revitalizing Kennedy’s health, putting him on a comprehensive pain management program that included physical therapy, hormone replacement, anti-inflammatory drugs, and the opioids methadone, codeine and meperidine (Demerol).

One of the first things she noticed was the callouses under Kennedy’s armpits from using crutches so often.

“On the day she met him, she put him in a hospital and started methadone that day, as a long-acting opioid, and then she also had him on Demerol and some other miscellaneous opioids. But his two main opioids were methadone and then Demerol for breakthrough pain,” said Tennant.

The precise dosage given to JFK is unknown, but Tennant estimates it was initially 300 to 500 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) a day, a level that would be considered risky under the CDC’s 2016 opioid prescribing guideline. The guideline recommended that dosages not exceed 90 MME.

“It would have exceeded the CDC guidelines by far,” says Tennant. “The methadone dose would have exceeded the CDC guidelines itself. But she knew to put him on methadone and if it hadn't been for methadone, he’d never have been president. He had to have something to stabilize himself right at that time. And he had to have a second opioid for breakthrough pain.”

Dosages that high today would likely attract the attention of the Drug Enforcement Administration, which investigates and prosecutes doctors for writing high-dose prescriptions. Tennant himself came under scrutiny from the DEA for giving intractable pain patients high doses, and his office and home were raided by DEA agents in 2017. Tennant was never charged with a crime, but he retired from clinical practice a few months later.

Raids like that have had a chilling effect on doctors nationwide. Many now refuse to see pain patients on opioids, regardless of the dose.

“JFK would not have been welcome today in pain clinics,” says Tennant. “My patients were very similar to JFK, almost same disease, same kind of doses, and the same kind of therapies. And of course, today that is taboo. But that was the standard in the 1950’s.  

“It's only been in the last few years that the government has decided that the standard treatment that has been there for half a century is now almost a crime.”

Dr. Travell never came under that kind of scrutiny, but Dr. Jacobsen did. Dubbed “Dr. Feelgood” by critics for his unconventional treatments, Jacobson’s medical license was suspended in New York state a few years after Kennedy’s death. The 1972 Controlled Substances Act ensured that his cocktail would never be prescribed again.

Tennant says there is no evidence the cocktail harmed or impaired JFK, who was never hospitalized or bed-bound during the 8 years he was under Jacobson’s care.

Without Jacobson and Travell, Tennant believes it unlikely Kennedy would have run for president or been elected.

“That's one of the reasons why I wrote the book. I think people need to know that JFK’s treatment was opioids. And his treatment was the standard of the day, up until the recent fiat by the federal government and state medical boards. The country got along for half a century with those standards quite well,” Tennant said.

In addition to his book about JFK, Tennant has written books about Howard Hughes and Elvis Presley, who also lived with -- and overcame -- chronic health problems.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.  

CDC Study Shows Oxycodone Plays Minor Role in Overdose Crisis

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new study by the CDC highlights the sharply rising death toll in the U.S. caused by illicit fentanyl, while at the same time revealing the minor role played by oxycodone in the nation’s overdose crisis.

The study, released this week by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, looked at overdose death rates from 2016 to 2021. Deaths involving fentanyl more than tripled during that period, rising from 5.7 deaths per 100,000 people in 2016 to 21.6 deaths per 100,000 in 2021. Drug deaths involving methamphetamine and cocaine also rose sharply, while fatal overdoses involving heroin declined.

And what about oxycodone, the most commonly prescribed opioid pain medication? It turns out oxycodone has always played a relatively minor role in the overdose crisis, although regulators and public health officials said otherwise in a concerted campaign against all prescription opioids.

“Overprescribing opioids – largely for chronic pain – is a key driver of America’s drug overdose epidemic,” then-CDC director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a 2016 news release.

But the facts don’t support Frieden’s claim. In 2016, the year the CDC released its controversial opioid prescribing guideline, there were only 1.9 deaths per 100,000 people that involved oxycodone. By 2021, the rate had fallen 21% to 1.5 deaths -- well below the death rates of fentanyl, methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin.   

Drug Overdose Deaths in U.S. (2016-2021)

SOURCE: CDC

CDC researchers used an unusual method to conduct this study. Instead of relying on medical ICD-10 codes in death certificates, which lump drugs together into broad categories, the CDC used a “literal text” analysis.

“To address the limitations of ICD–10- coded mortality data, the National Center for Health Statistics has developed a method that searches the literal text of death certificates to identify mentions of specific drugs and other substances involved in the death. Death certificate literal text is the written information provided by the medical certifier, usually a medical examiner or coroner for drug overdose deaths, that describes the causes, manner, and circumstances contributing to the death,” the researchers explained.

Flawed Data

The literal text method is not foolproof, but it’s an improvement over the ICD-10 codes, which the CDC admitted in 2018 “significantly inflate” the number of deaths involving prescription opioids — flawed data that Frieden used to make his “key driver” of the epidemic claim in 2016.

How inflated were the overdose numbers back then?  Using the old ICD-10 method, which counted illicit fentanyl as a prescription opioid, Frieden’s CDC estimated that nearly 32,500 Americans died from overdoses of opioid medication in 2016. The death toll was later revised downward to about 17,000 overdoses after the CDC came clean about its flawed methodology.

Patient advocate Richard “Red” Lawhern has long been suspicious of CDC data, including studies that use literal text analysis.  

“CDC suggests an incidence of drug overdose deaths ‘involving’ oxycodone at only 1.5 per 100,000.  But they neatly avoid telling us that such a rate is so low that it confounds the non-uniformity of reporting from county to county, creating such statistical noise that the contribution of this agent (oxycodone) to overdose mortality is too small to accurately measure or report,” Lawhern said.  

Another problem is the qualifications of county coroners and medical examiners varies. Some are elected to their positions without any medical training or experience. The death certificates they fill out usually don’t say if a prescription drug was obtained legally or illicitly, or what specific drug or combination of substances caused the death. That is determined later by a toxicology test. As a result, a drug may be “involved” in a death and be listed on the death certificate, but have little or nothing to do with someone’s demise.

“It is startling that CDC has so consistently and deliberately conspired to disguise the fact that oxycodone really isn't significant in drug overdose mortality, and probably never has been,” Lawhern told PNN. 

Of course, every death is a tragedy in some way, regardless of the cause or substance involved. The graphic below helps bring oxycodone’s role into more context – comparing the five leading causes of death in 2021 to those involving fentanyl, oxycodone and the other drugs.

SOURCE: CDC

Despite the minor role played by oxycodone in 2021 deaths, efforts continue to restrict its availability. This year the Drug Enforcement Administration reduced the supply of oxycodone for the seventh consecutive year. Since their peak in 2013, DEA production quotas for oxycodone have fallen by 65 percent. The tightened supply has resulted in recent reports of oxycodone shortages and patients unable to get their prescriptions filled.

The DEA justifies the cuts by saying it is concerned about diversion and abuse, but the agency’s own data shows that less than one percent of legally prescribed oxycodone (0.3%) is diverted to someone it was not intended for.

U.S. Prescription Opioid Use Fell 7.4% in 2022

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The amount of prescription opioids sold in the United States fell another 7.4% last year, according to a new report by the IQVIA Institute, a healthcare data tracking firm.

Since their peak in 2011, per capita use of prescription opioids by Americans has declined 64 percent, falling to levels last seen in the year 2000. Despite that historic decline, fatal overdoses in the U.S. have climbed to record levels, fueled primarily by illicit fentanyl and other street drugs.

“The greatest reductions in prescription opioid volume — measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) — have been in higher-risk segments receiving greater than 90 MMEs per day,” the IQVIA report found. “Despite significant progress in reducing opioid prescriptions to combat the opioid overdose epidemic, overdose deaths have been rising, primarily due to illicit synthetic opioids.”

The CDC estimates there were 108,712 overdose deaths in the 12-month period ending in November, 2022. About 72,000 of those deaths involved heroin or synthetic opioids such as fentanyl.

By comparison, drug deaths involving legal prescription opioids have remained relatively flat, averaging about 16,000 a year since 2017. They ticked upwards in 2020 and 2021, but appear have trended downward again in 2022, according to the IQVIA.

Prescription Opioid Use and Opioid Overdose Deaths

It appears likely that prescription opioid use will fall again in 2023, due in part to further cuts in opioid production quotas imposed on drug makers by the Drug Enforcement Administration. The DEA says the opioid supply will still be “sufficient to meet all legitimate needs,” but as PNN has reported, some manufacturers are currently reporting shortages of oxycodone and hydrocodone.      

Pain patients have complained for years about chain pharmacies being unable or unwilling to fill their opioid prescriptions, but the problem seems to have grown worse in recent months, particularly at CVS.

“Every month I have to spend hours on the phone trying to find a location that has them in stock,” a CVS customer in Indiana told us. “We should not have to be subjected to this every month!” 

“Some pharmacists are anti opiate. No matter what. She was rude and she is the manager. While it’s hard every month to fill, this time her rude attitude was over the top,” said another CVS customer in Colorado.

Medication Costs Declining 

There is some good news in the IQVIA report: medications are getting cheaper. The average amount paid out-of-pocket for a retail prescription fell from $10.15 in 2017 to $9.38 in 2022. Uninsured patients who pay the full amount in cash have also seen their drug costs decline slightly.

The use of manufacturer copay assistance programs and coupons is growing, collectively saving patients about $19 billion in 2022.

Over the next five years, growth in the use of biosimilar drugs to treat autoimmune conditions, diabetes and cancer is expected to save consumers over $180 billion. Like generic drugs, biosimilars are medications that can replace more expensive biologics such as Humira, which are losing patient protection.

Altogether, spending on medicines for the next five years is expected to be flat, according to the IQVIA, with rising costs in some drug classes offset by declines in others.

Petition Asks FDA to Take NarxCare Off the Market

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A citizen’s petition filed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is asking that controversial software used by Bamboo Health to analyze health data and give patients “risk scores” be declared a misbranded medical device and taken off the market.

The petition by the Center for U.S. Policy (CUSP) says the software “has fundamentally altered the practice of medicine in the U.S. to the detriment of patients” by depriving many of them of access to opioids and other controlled drugs.

(Update: On July 21, the CUSP petition was rejected by FDA on procedural grounds because it was “not within the scope” of the agency’s petition process.)

The clinical decision support (CDS) software – known as NarxCare -- uses proprietary algorithms to gather and analyze prescription drug and other health information for millions of patients, creating risk scores for them based on their potential for misuse. The risk scores are widely used by hospitals, pharmacies, insurers and other healthcare providers to decide whether to prescribe and dispense controlled substances to patients.

Patient advocates have long said the Narxcare scores are inaccurate and being abused, depriving legitimate patients of medications to treat pain, anxiety, depression and opioid use disorder (OUD). Some also believe the scores are being used by law enforcement to identify and take action against doctors writing high-dose prescriptions.

“There are a lot of cases of people being harmed,” says Lynn Webster, MD, a pain management expert and Senior Fellow at CUSP. “What tipped the scale for me was when I was asked to look at records for a doctor who had been accused of prescribing inappropriately, totally based on a risk score. And his records did not justify being investigated or asking that his DEA license to be forfeited.

‘There is actually no validity to the scores that they provide. Too many people are being harmed from a lot of different perspectives. It’s only hurting people, not helping.”  

Having NarxCare declared a misbranded medical device is a novel approach, but Webster says the software is no different than any other device used to diagnose and treat a patient. Medical devices need prior approval from the FDA, which the agency has not given to NarxCare. Bamboo Health closely guards what data is used to create its risk scores.

“If you’re going to have a decision support tool for physicians, they have to have enough information to take a look at the content of what goes into developing that score, so they can override it and make their own judgements. But there is no information about what has really gone into it that’s publicly available that I can find,” Webster told PNN.

The petition asks the FDA to issue a warning letter to Bamboo Health, start a mandatory recall, and inform healthcare providers not to use the NarxCare risk scores.

Bamboo Health did not respond to requests for comment. In the past, the company has defended its software as an important clinical tool to help providers identify patients at risk of abusing opioids, antidepressants, sedatives and stimulants. Much of the data is collected from state-run Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs), which gather information on virtually every patient in the country who has been prescribed a controlled substance.

A 2021 clinical study looked at NarxCare scores for nearly 1,500 patients who were prescribed opioids in Ohio and Indiana. Researchers concluded that their risk scores were a “useful initial screening tool” for prescribers. The scores were deemed 86.5% accurate in identifying patients who are at low risk of opioid misuse.  

But prescribers are not the only gatekeepers in the process. If a physician decides to go ahead and write a prescription for a “high risk” patient, a pharmacy or insurer could still refuse to dispense or pay for the medication, based on their NarxCare score.

“When patients with pain, OUD, anxiety, or insomnia, for example, have inadequate access to controlled medications their health care providers deem necessary, the resultant harms can include relegation to the illicit drug market, exposure to substances adulterated with illegal fentanyl, prosecution and incarceration, drug poisoning, suicide, and death,” Michael Barnes, CUSP’s chairman, said in a statement.  

Study Linking Suicides to Rx Opioids Not Supported by Data

By Dr. Stefan Kertesz

Almost everyone has a personal connection to the national overdose crisis that claimed over 107,000 lives last year. Many have also been touched by the rising toll of suicides in the U.S, which took over 47,000 lives in 2021.

Given the pain of those losses, debates over causes and solutions are contentious, especially when they involve the real or speculative role played by prescribed opioids in suicides. In the quest for solutions, researchers and advocates sometimes make recommendations that are not supported by data.

Recently, an article in the American Journal of Psychiatry (AJP) that was widely covered in the lay press, suggested that reductions in the chronic use of prescribed opioids for patients with pain slowed an otherwise discouraging national 20-year rise in suicides. Further, the paper suggests its findings should alleviate concerns about dose reductions in pain patients who have relied on these medicines long term. However, these conclusions were not supported by the data in the study or in any other available data.

Given rising national concern about a burgeoning opioid crisis, many doctors forcibly reduced doses in long-term recipients of prescribed opioids, often under pressure from regulators and boards. Unfortunately, suicides started happening among patients who were taken off their medication.

A series of state- and national-database analyses have documented, retrospectively, elevated rates of mental health crises, suicidal actions or death by suicide among those persons whose doses were reduced, compared to persons not subject to reduction. Because the risk for suicide or suicide attempt remains elevated 1-2 years after the reduction, it has not seemed likely that these tragedies are entirely due to acute withdrawal from opioids. Various authorities have called for caution, as have clinician-researchers like me.

The new article in AJP, from investigators at Columbia University, pushes back. It reports that areas of the country with the biggest declines in opioid prescriptions partly bucked a national trend toward rising suicides.

A few details make it easier to think about what such regional studies can and cannot show. The study relies on suicide data from 2009 to 2017, across 882 “commuting zones” (as devised by the Bureau of Agriculture, areas typically bigger than a county). As mentioned: suicides rose nationally over the study years 2009-2017. Opioid prescriptions dropped from a 2012 peak to the present.

Statistical models tested whether suicide rates rose less in those regions with the greater prescription declines. Of course, regions differ. The study’s models tried to control for that by assigning a single statistical term for each region called a “fixed effect.” The assumption behind a “fixed effect” is the following: As long as the regions differ from each other in “fixed” ways that did not change from 2009-2017, then the models controlled for such differences

This is not a reasonable assumption. We know that regions change in many ways likely to contribute to reductions in opioid prescribing and suicide, without one causing the other. One town might enjoy some economic development, an influx of young families, and new doctors who prescribe less; a decline in suicide might result from all these good things, without the opioid prescriptions having much to do with it. Statistical and graphical analysis could have helped readers learn whether the model’s assumptions were acceptable; but they weren’t presented.

Still, this paper does show that regions with a greater decline in opioid prescriptions (compared to all others) had a smaller rise in total suicides and in opioid-related suicide rates (compared to all others). That regional pattern merits investigation. But there were also exceptions (this pattern wasn’t evident in adults 65 or older). And, for younger persons, unintentional deaths involving opioids seemed to rise most in regions with the greatest prescription declines.

No Justification for Forced Tapering

There would be nothing problematic about this article if all it did was present its data and invite further discussion. The article, however, proposed to address the matter of tapering long-term opioid recipients. The introduction cited two of the studies where suicide risk rose after reduction (including one I co-authored), and attempted to refute them -- an unusual approach for an introduction.

Then, the paper’s discussion argues that it is the patient who receives the prescription who is put at personal risk for suicide, citing a VA paper where opioid doses did correlate with suicide risk. But that discussion omits a much richer Australian study that looked for, and could not find, any association between opioid receipt, or opioid dose, and suicidality.

Buried in the discussion, a caveat was offered, that the results “do not shed light on the clinical pathways connecting local opioid prescribing to individual opioid overdose suicide deaths.”  However, this went unnoticed by many readers. (It was an academic article version of churnalist’s fifth sin: “disclaim and pivot.”)

As a physician-researcher, I care about whether studies are used in ways that misrepresent the risks of curtailing prescriptions in patients with pain. Today, I lead a federally-funded study to examine 110-120 suicides through interviews and record review. We seek to examine them in depth, the way crash-site investigators assess airplane crashes. That’s because we don’t see suicide as simple one-cause affairs.

However, simple stories appeal to reporters. The new paper ignited a storm of inaccurate press coverage, that was seen by many as endorsing the safety of forced opioid reductions, notwithstanding CDC and FDA declarations to the contrary. Speaking to US News and World Report, for example, an associate professor of surgery announced, “for those who have wondered whether curtailing opioid prescriptions could be associated with an increased risk of suicide, this study is reassuring.”

Within days, a widely-quoted, highly-paid expert witness for the plaintiffs in our nation’s ongoing opioid litigation tweeted that the new data “debunk” a “hoax that opioid reduction caused an ‘epidemic’ of suicides” (designation of a suicide “hoax” is not a one-time affair for this expert). 

Of course, no experts had claimed an “epidemic” of suicides. Rather experts and patients observed that tapering can increase the risk for suicide, and were appropriately concerned to avoid that.

Ultimately, reporters repeated the fallacy that regional data can tell us how to care for individual patients. But it was the way the paper was written -- most notably its introduction and discussion -- rather than its data, that drew that interpretation. I suspect that public mockery of suicide risk was not the outcome desired by the authors, given that the final lines of the paper urged caution with opioid dose changes.

Speaking with senior author Dr. Mark Olfson confirmed that sense. He readily offered the following condemnation:

“The results of our recent study indicate that regions of the country that experienced the greatest declines in opioid prescribing also tended to have the greatest declines in regional suicide rates. It would be a mistake, however, to assume that this ecological observation informs the daily clinical management of individuals receiving opioids for chronic pain or refutes clinical research demonstrating risks attending forced opioid tapers.”

Commonsense care of individual patients requires nuance. The best practice is not to force opioid reductions without consent, save when the justification is exceptionally compelling. Even then, the clinician must have a plan to protect the patient from harm, and reverse course if their dose reduction harms the patient.

Individual clinical decisions should not be based on findings from geographic analysis of populations. Clinicians and researchers alike might best avert suicide by seeking a careful understanding of the particular patient, their history, and their context.

Stefan G. Kertesz, MD, is a Professor of Medicine and Public Health at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, and physician-investigator at the Birmingham Alabama Veterans Healthcare System. His views are his own, and do not represent positions of his employers. On Twitter he is at @StefanKertesz. His team’s study can be found here.

This article first appeared in Sensible Medicine on Substack and is republished with permission.

Women, Children and Some Ethnic Groups at More Risk from NSAID

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Health experts have known for over a decade that diclofenac, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), raises the risk of heart failure, stroke and other cardiovascular problems. Because of that, oral formulations of diclofenac are only available by prescription in the U.S. and some European nations, although the drug is still widely available as an over-the-counter pain reliever in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

“Most patients who are using diclofenac have arthritis, and many of them are at risk of heart disease,” says Bhagwat Prasad, PharmD, an associate professor in the Washington State University College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. “So there is a concern that taking diclofenac may be putting them at even greater risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack and stroke.”

Prasad is senior author of a study, recently published in the journal Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, that found women, children and some ethnic groups are more at risk from diclofenac because they have low levels of an enzyme that helps metabolize the drug in their intestines.

The enzyme – known as UGT2B17 – is present at much lower levels in women than in men, which helps explain why there are more reports of women suffering heart damage after taking diclofenac. UGT2B17 is mostly absent in children under the age of nine.

Ethnic differences also play a role. In studies on human liver and intestinal samples, WSU researchers found that up to 90% of people of Japanese descent lack the gene for the enzyme, compared to just 20% of Caucasian people.

“No one knew why this heart toxicity is happening in some individuals,” said first author Deepak Ahire, a graduate student in the WSU College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. “Our study showed, for the first time, that UGT2B17 is important in diclofenac metabolism and suggests that differences in UGT2B17 expression are what makes people’s response to diclofenac so variable, leading to toxicity in some whereas for others the drug simply does not work.”

Ahire and his colleagues hope to confirm their findings in a clinical trial. They also want to work with large hospitals to further study the connection between diclofenac and patients with heart problems. One way they suggest to reduce the risk of cardiovascular problems is to use genetic testing to screen patients who may have problems metabolizing diclofenac.

According to the FDA’s Adverse Events Reporting System, there have been over 27,000 serious medical cases involving diclofenac since 2010, including 2,827 deaths. The number of U.S. cases has tripled in recent years, with women involved in nearly twice as many adverse events as men.

In 2020, the FDA approved the use of diclofenac in Voltaren, a topical OTC gel that contains a small dose of diclofenac absorbed through the skin. The WSU study involved higher dose diclofenac tablets that are taken orally and absorbed in the digestive system. About half the prescriptions written for diclofenac in the U.S. are for tablets.

A large 2018 study in Denmark found that people who used diclofenac were 50 percent more likely to have cardiovascular problems within 30 days of taking the drug than those who took nothing. The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was also higher. The authors of that study recommended that diclofenac not be available OTC and should only be prescribed with prominent warning labels.