Does U.S. Have Opioid Crisis or Overdose Crisis?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A lot of people were surprised by an alarming report from the CDC last week, showing that a record 100,306 Americans died of a drug overdose in the 12-month period ending in April, 2021. That’s a 28.5% increase in a single year.

Among those who were caught off-guard was Andrew Kolodny, MD, an opioid researcher at Brandeis University and founder of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an anti-opioid activist group.

“I was surprised by the latest tally from the CDC showing that for the first time ever, the number of Americans who fatally overdosed over the course of a year surpassed 100,000,” Kolodny wrote in an op/ed for The Conversation that’s been republished in several major newspapers.

“The soaring death toll has been fueled by a much more dangerous black market opioid supply. Illicitly synthesized fentanyl – a potent and inexpensive opioid that has driven the rise in overdoses since it emerged in 2014 – is increasingly replacing heroin. Fentanyl and fentanyl analogs were responsible for almost two-thirds of the overdose deaths.”

It’s refreshing to see Kolodny finally address the elephant in the room – illicit fentanyl – instead of always blaming prescription opioids for America’s addiction and overdose problem. But he continues to frame the drug crisis as an “opioid crisis” when repeated studies show that multiple substances are usually involved in overdoses, including non-opioid drugs like cocaine and methamphetamine.  

“It is especially tragic that these deaths are mainly occurring in people with a disease – opioid addiction – that is both preventable and treatable. Most heroin users want to avoid fentanyl. But increasingly, the heroin they seek is mixed with fentanyl or what they purchase is just fentanyl without any heroin in the mix,” Kolodny wrote.

“Opioid-addicted individuals seeking prescription opioids instead of heroin have also been affected, because counterfeit pills made with fentanyl have become more common.”

Here Kolodny sidesteps the fact that many pain patients are turning to street drugs because of government and law enforcement policies that restrict the prescribing of opioid medication – policies that Kolodny and PROP had a significant role in creating. They’re not addicts “seeking prescription opioids instead of heroin.” They’re patients seeking pain relief.

“Our misdirected efforts to solve the overdose epidemic have led to even more deaths. As long as we myopically focus on reducing prescription opioids for people in pain, the overdose epidemic will continue and worsen,” says Lynn Webster, MD, a pain management expert, Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy (CUSP) and Chief Medical Officer of PainScript.  

“Some of those who need opioids will be driven to the streets where they will find illicit and, potentially, lethal opioids. Some people may even choose to end their own lives. Your readers may have seen the recent article that described a suit against a physician for denying opioid treatment of a patient. The patient committed suicide as a result.” 

Webster says it is wrong to single out opioids – legal or illicit – for America’s escalating drug problem when the causes are complex and embedded in society. 

“We do have an overdose epidemic. Unfortunately, policymakers and the media have wrongly categorized it as an opioid epidemic rather than a drug overdose epidemic,” says Webster. “The roots of the overdose crisis are deep and seeded in despair from major shifts in socioeconomic conditions and lack of adequate and affordable healthcare. The Covid pandemic has made clear that social and mental health issues must be addressed if the overdose crisis is to be reversed. 

“The only solution to the overdose epidemic is to lower the demand. This will require a broad approach that involves addressing socioeconomic and mental health drivers of demand. More affordable and accessible treatment is important but will not solve the crisis.” 

Invested in Opioid Crisis 

Changing the narrative about the overdose crisis won’t be easy, since so many lawyers, politicians, healthcare companies and media outlets have invested in perpetuating the “opioid crisis.” Kolodny and other PROP board members have lucrative side hustles testifying as expert witnesses in opioid litigation cases for plaintiff law firms, which stand to make billions of dollars in contingency fees if their lawsuits are successful. 

One such case was decided by a federal jury in Cleveland today, which found that Walgreens, CVS and Walmart substantially contributed to addiction and overdoses in two Ohio counties by dispensing opioids in their pharmacies. The companies said they would appeal. 

“Plaintiffs' attorneys sued Walmart in search of deep pockets while ignoring the real causes of the opioid crisis-such as pill mill doctors, illegal drugs, and regulators asleep at the switch,” Walmart said in a statement. “And they wrongly claimed pharmacists must second-guess doctors in a way the law never intended and many federal and state health regulators say interferes with the doctor-patient relationship.”

Judges in Oklahoma and California recently ruled that opioid manufacturers are not “public nuisances” and can’t be held responsible for what people ultimately do with their drugs.  

Overdose Crisis Reaches Grim Milestone

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

The CDC announced this week that the U.S. has seen over 100,000 drug overdose deaths in the 12-month period ending May, 2021. This record-high spike in overdoses is thought to be primarily a result of pandemic lockdowns and the continuing spread of illicit fentanyl.

National Institute on Drug Abuse director Nora Volkow, MD, told NPR that the overdoses “are driven both by fentanyl and also by methamphetamines" and predicted that the surge of fatalities would continue because of the spread of more dangerous street drugs.

Connecticut this week warned that fentanyl was found in marijuana and is the suspected cause of several near-fatal overdoses in the state. “This is the first lab-confirmed case of marijuana with fentanyl in Connecticut and possibly the first confirmed case in the United States,” said state public health Commissioner Manisha Juthani, MD.

When asked if there is anything giving hope about the future of the drug crisis, PROP co-founder Andrew Koldony, MD, told Axios, “Uh... not really.”

Public health is often depressing. It is also rarely simple. We are not going to arrest, restrict or treat our way out of the drug crisis. Although harm reduction and improved access to addiction services will help, they will not be sufficient to reverse current trends.

The U.S. does not even have good data on the street drug supply. RAND researcher Bryce Pardo, PhD, looking at better and more current data in Canada, sees designer street drugs becoming even more dangerous.

“There is a recent and alarming trend toward more harmful supply of drugs sold in illegal markets in Canada. Consumers in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia buying powder may be at greater risk for exposure to fentanyl mixed with novel benzodiazepines,” Pardo reported in JAMA Psychiatry. “There is a need to improve monitoring and surveillance of drug consumption in the US as markets continue to trend toward more harmful drug mixtures.”

The U.S. also doesn’t have good data on drug deaths. Even the term “overdose” is problematic now. Deaths that are “opioid involved” in toxicological terms are resulting from inadvertent exposure via tainted cocaine and methamphetamine. And although fentanyl and other opioids are still involved in the majority of deaths, there are now more psychostimulant-involved deaths than there were two decades ago.

The U.S. also lacks good data on the people who died, in particular their drug use history, general health status, and other factors thought to affect drug risks and outcomes. It is easy to speculate that the stress and isolation of the pandemic exacerbated existing risks, but it is important to note that suicides did not rise in 2020 when they might have been expected to.

There is no easy policy fix here. Restricting prescription opioids and legalizing cannabis didn’t work. Ideology will not help. Legalizing drugs is a meaningless slogan since neither “drugs” nor “legalization” is well-defined. The same with old narratives and origin stories about the crisis, which may help explain what happened but contribute little about what to do next.

Safe supply is an appealing but problematic notion. There is no obvious way to test illicit substances in human trials. Illicit labs are unlikely to hold back their products any more than illicit cannabis suppliers are going to obey the law. Street drug test kits might help, if only we knew enough about the drugs and their users.

Treatment is similarly challenging. As Kolodny told Axios, “If we really want to see deaths come down in the short run, someone who's opioid addicted has to be able to access treatment more easily than they can buy a bag of heroin or fentanyl.” Though this is an admirable goal, there is no practical way to do it.

And all of this assumes that street users are opioid-addicted. More and more are not, as the increasing levels of death and harm from psychostimulants shows. Further, an increasing number of deaths are “polydrug” deaths involving two or more substances, which makes addressing risks all the more complicated.

But despair is not the appropriate response. The U.S. was facing rapidly rising rates of tobacco-related illness and death for much of the 20th century. But a combination of public health measures has cut the mortality rate from smoking in half since 1990. These measures include stricter laws and regulations, increased costs, and in an unexpected irony, stigmatization of smoking.

Many of the proposed solutions to the drug crisis have been based more on intuition than data. At this point we simply do not know which public health measures are working or how to improve them. What little data we have is often imprecise and years old, and as the crisis accelerates, the importance of granular and timely data grows. Moreover, the measures to date have often been applied piecemeal for short periods, so their real efficacy remains to be determined.

The tragedy of drug deaths cannot be understated, and the potential for far more drug deaths cannot be underestimated. But if the U.S. can improve its understanding of drugs and its response to risks and harms, we needn’t see so many more deaths moving forward.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research. 

OHSU Focused on Opioid Tapering, but at What Cost to Patients?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An internal medicine clinic at Oregon Health & Science University has significantly reduced the use of opioid pain medication through the use of a review board that oversees whether prescriptions are in line with federal and state guidelines, according to a new study.

“The question was, how do clinics actually implement those guidelines in practice?” co-author Jonathan Robbins, MD, assistant professor of medicine at the OHSU School of Medicine, said in a press release. “The opioid review board was a way to turn high-level recommendations into action steps we can take in our clinic to treat patients and create a culture of safe prescribing.”

The study highlights the declining use of high dose opioids at the clinic since 2017, along with increased prescriptions for the addiction treatment drug Suboxone (buprenorphine). But critics say the research failed to address whether pain relief and quality of life improved for patients or if they suffered side effects when they were tapered to lower doses or prescribed buprenorphine.

“This is a frustratingly vague account of a practice that could have serious implications for treating a large number of people with chronic pain,” said Bob Twillman, PhD, former Executive Director of the Academy of Integrative Pain Management. 

“The summary statistics presented give us some idea about how frequently people are being tapered, and how often they are being transitioned to buprenorphine, but we really could use some better data analysis, especially with respect to outcomes,” Twillman wrote in an email. “The article continues a trend in the literature, in which an output of these interventions (i.e., the change in prescribing) is confused with an outcome (i.e., what happens to the patient as a result). Basically, the article says, ‘We decided to do this, and we think it's great.’ But there are no data presented to back that up.”

“We’ll let the article stand for itself,” is the response PNN received from Erik Robinson, a senior communications specialist at OHSU. Robinson declined a request to speak with the authors of the study and to identify members of the review board.

“The article published in the Annals of Family Medicine describes a clinical practice in general terms, and we will not engage questions about specific patient outcomes and clinical discussions among physicians,” Robinson said in an email.

‘High-Risk Cases’ Reviewed

What can be gleaned from the article is that patients with more than 6 opioid prescriptions in a 9-month period had their cases reviewed, along with those on high daily doses that exceed 90 MME (morphine milligram equivalent) or those co-prescribed benzodiazepines. The 90 MME threshold is based on a recommendation in the 2016 CDC opioid guideline.

“We combed through 14,000 patients in our clinic and developed a registry about who we’re chronically treating with opioids,” co-author Mary Pickett, MD, associate professor of medicine in the OHSU School of Medicine, said in the press release. “We picked out high-risk cases to review and invited those patients’ primary care doctors to consult with us.”

The review board initially identified 664 patients on chronic opioid therapy (COT). Three years later, there were only 458 COT patients at the clinic, the number of high-dose opioid prescriptions was reduced significantly, and buprenorphine prescriptions increased over 300 percent.  

But there is no information on how many patients experienced withdrawal, whether their pain levels and quality of life improved, or if patients were satisfied with their treatment. The study only notes that “a subset of patients have had adverse response to tapering.” Those cases were reviewed a second time, but again there are no details about patient outcomes or if the tapering was stopped..

The FDA warned in 2019 that rapid tapering or abrupt discontinuation of opioid therapy could result in serious harm to patients, including withdrawal, uncontrolled pain, psychological distress and suicide. A recent study found that tapered patients were 68% more likely to be hospitalized for withdrawal, overdose or alcohol intoxication, and twice as likely to have a mental health crisis such as depression, anxiety or suicide attempt.  

“We’re coaching primary care providers to approach this carefully, and, when necessary, slowly taper their patients,” Robbins says in the OHSU press release. “We don’t do anything abruptly, and patients have supported this careful process.”

But Twillman wonders if the tapering was voluntary and if patients agreed to have their cases reviewed. The press release mentions a waiver being signed by patients, but the study does not.

“That detail is missing from the scientific publication, and it raises a concern about the extent to which that signature is truly voluntary, or if it is coerced by a threat to stop prescribing if the waiver is not signed. What is the consequence for patients who don't sign the waiver?” asked Twillman.

“And what happens if tapering or transition to buprenorphine is recommended, and the patient doesn't agree? We've seen the dangers of involuntary tapers in several studies now, so is any tapering that happens truly voluntary, and supported appropriately with ancillary services? In sum, this article raises more questions than it answers.”

Patient Urged to Taper

“In my experience, they care more about de-prescribing than they do about their patients' individual needs,” says Emma, a patient at OHSU’s Comprehensive Pain Center who lives with an intractable pain condition. She asked that we not use her real name because she fears retaliation or being discharged from the pain clinic.

Emma gets opioids from her primary care provider, but can’t get any from the pain clinic, which she says has a strict policy against prescribing opioids at any dose.

Emma says she is constantly urged to taper by her OHSU doctor. The pain clinic emphasizes non-opioid alternative treatments such as physical therapy, acupuncture, yoga, massage and psychotherapy. 

“I’m getting pretty damn fed up with OHSU’s total lack of concern for my wellbeing. They’ve all but eliminated individualized care when it comes to the treatment of pain.”

— OHSU patient

“I told them that I had spent years trying every possible alternative, and had become suicidal due to severe untreated pain. That was when my primary doc asked me to at least consider opioids as an alternative to taking my own life. I did try them, and they gave me my functionality back,” she told PNN.

“I'm getting pretty damn fed up with OHSU's total lack of concern for my wellbeing. They've all but eliminated individualized care when it comes to the treatment of pain. And how they can label the Comprehensive Pain Center a ‘pain management clinic’ while completely eliminating an entire class of effective medications is beyond me.”

Roger Chou’s Role

Patients at OHSU’s Comprehensive Pain Center were apparently not included in the study on tapering. But they too have their cases regularly reviewed by a panel of pain management experts.

One of the experts is Roger Chou, MD, a prolific researcher and longtime critic of opioid prescribing who heads OHSU’s Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC). According to the website GovTribe, over the last five years OHSU has been awarded over $2 billion in federal grants – much of it going to the EPC to support Chou’s medical research.

In addition to his research, Chou co-authored the CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline and has collaborated on several occasions with members of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an anti-opioid advocacy group.

In 2019, Chou co-authored an op/ed with PROP President Dr. Jane Ballantyne and PROP board member Dr. Anna Lembke that encourages doctors to consider tapering “every patient receiving long term opioid therapy.” He also served on a state task force that supported a rigid opioid tapering policy for Medicaid patients in Oregon.

Emma considers Chou “a major player behind all of OHSU’s anti-opioid policies” and is concerned that guidelines that he helped write are being used to justify tapering.

“It’s concerning to me that they’re justifying these actions by stating that they’re ‘in alignment with the guidelines.’ So essentially, they are both creating and enforcing their own set of guidelines with no transparency and no real oversight,” she said.

Last year, the American Medical Association called for a major overhaul of the CDC guideline, saying it was clear the agency’s recommendations “harmed many patients” by setting arbitrary limits on opioids.

The CDC is currently in the process of revising and possibly expanding the guideline, with the goal of releasing a new version next year. One of the authors drafting the revised guideline is Roger Chou.

Fearing DEA, Many Pharmacies Stop Dispensing Addiction Medication

By Aneri Pattani, Kaiser Health News

When Martin Njoku saw opioid addiction devastate his West Virginia community, he felt compelled to help. This was the place he’d called home for three decades, where he’d raised his two girls and turned his dream of owning a pharmacy into reality.

In 2016, after flooding displaced people in nearby counties, Njoku began dispensing buprenorphine to them and to local customers at his Oak Hill Hometown Pharmacy in Fayette County.

Buprenorphine, a controlled substance sold under the brand names Subutex and Suboxone, is a medication to treat opioid use disorder. Research shows it halves the risk of overdose and doubles people’s chances of entering long-term recovery.

“I thought I was doing what was righteous for people who have illness,” Njoku said.

But a few years later, the Drug Enforcement Administration raided Njoku’s pharmacy and accused the facility of contributing to the opioid epidemic rather than curbing it. The agency revoked the pharmacy’s registration to dispense controlled substances, claiming it posed an “imminent danger to public health and safety.” Although two judges separately ruled in Njoku’s favor, the DEA’s actions effectively shuttered his business.

“I lost everything that I worked for,” Njoku said.

Lawyers, pharmacists, harm-reduction advocates and a former DEA employee say Njoku’s case is emblematic of the DEA’s aggressive stance on buprenorphine. An opioid itself, the medication can be misused, so the DEA works to limit its diversion to the streets. But many say the agency’s policies are exacerbating the opioid epidemic by scaring pharmacies away from dispensing this medication when it’s desperately needed.

Drug overdose deaths hit record highs last year, and despite medical experts considering medications like buprenorphine the gold standard, less than 20% of people with opioid use disorder typically receive them. The federal government has taken steps to increase the number of clinicians who prescribe buprenorphine, but many patients struggle to get those prescriptions filled. A recent study found that 1 in 5 U.S. pharmacies do not provide buprenorphine.

“Pharmacies are terrified they’re going to lose their DEA registration and go out of business,” said Charles “Buck” Selby, a former inspector and chief compliance officer for the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy, who retired in 2018.

The ramifications can be particularly acute in rural areas, where a dearth of addiction treatment providers, lack of transportation and stigma against these medications already create barriers. If pharmacies decline to provide buprenorphine too, patients will have few options left, Selby said.

The DEA did not respond to requests for comment.

Buprenorphine Misuse

Like many other prescription drugs, buprenorphine can be found illegally on the street. There are unscrupulous doctors who hand out prescriptions and pharmacists who fill them. Subutex, which consists of buprenorphine alone, is easier to misuse and typically has higher street value than Suboxone, a combination of buprenorphine and the overdose-reversal drug naloxone.

In the case against Njoku’s pharmacy, an assistant U.S. attorney explained that the DEA “got slapped hard for being asleep at the switch as the opioid crisis ramped up. … They’re trying to make sure that Subutex doesn’t become the next problem,” according to court transcripts.

But recent research suggests that buprenorphine misuse has decreased in recent years even as prescribing has increased, and that most people who use diverted buprenorphine do so to avoid withdrawal symptoms and because they can’t get a prescription.

Misuse rates for buprenorphine are twice as high as misuse rates for hydrocodone, oxycodone and other opioid medications, but buprenorphine is less likely to cause overdoses because its effects taper off at higher doses, said Dr. Aaron Wohl, medical director of the Florida-based coalition Project Opioid.

In Njoku’s case, the DEA said in court documents that several “red flags” had suggested the pharmacy’s actions were irresponsible. First, many of the prescriptions it filled were for Subutex instead of Suboxone. Patients also traveled – sometimes out of state – to get prescriptions, drove long distances within West Virginia to reach Njoku’s pharmacy, and often paid in cash.

In traditional prescription drug cases, these are all markers of trouble. But — as Njoku’s lawyers argued and two judges later agreed — they can also reflect the difficulty of getting addiction treatment, which is sometimes more challenging than obtaining illicit drugs.

“The practical reality and context of West Virginia turn these additional flags from red to yellow,” U.S. District Judge Joseph Goodwin wrote in his opinion. Patients may go out of their way for the drug because there aren’t enough nearby doctors who prescribe it or pharmacies that stock it, he wrote. They might pay cash because they’re uninsured or Medicaid won’t cover prescriptions written by an out-of-network doctor. And they might prefer Subutex because it’s often cheaper than Suboxone.

By 2020, Goodwin and an administrative law judge at the DEA had both ruled in Njoku’s favor. But several insurers and drug suppliers had already stopped doing business with him. Njoku closed the pharmacy in April 2021. 

‘Prescribing Cliff’

Across the country, when a pharmacy stops providing buprenorphine, the ripple effects can be far-reaching.

Trish Mashburn works at two independent pharmacies in western North Carolina. When a nearby pharmacy stopped dispensing buprenorphine, she began getting five calls a day from prospective customers trying to get their prescriptions filled, she said. Although both her employers stock buprenorphine, they order only a set amount, so Mashburn often must turn patients away.

Research in North Carolina and Kentucky has found that many pharmacists worry that ordering more buprenorphine will trigger a DEA investigation. The DEA does not specify thresholds for controlled substances, but it requires wholesalers to flag suspicious orders. In turn, wholesalers limit how much a pharmacy can buy or create algorithms to detect orders that exceed projected need.

They base these limits, in part, on the DEA’s enforcement actions, said Larry Cote, a former DEA attorney who now advises wholesalers, pharmacies and other clients on regulatory compliance. Since pharmacies are not typically privy to how these limits are set, many simply order small batches of buprenorphine out of caution.

That creates a “prescribing cliff,” said Bayla Ostrach, lead author of a paper studying this issue in North Carolina. Doctors may prescribe buprenorphine to more patients, but pharmacies order enough for only a certain number of customers. Since many people stay on buprenorphine for years, once the pharmacy hits its self-established quota, it may rarely have openings for new patients.

A Lee County, Florida, man thought he was one of the lucky ones. James, 34, had been filling his Subutex prescription at the supermarket chain Publix for seven years. In that time, he held steady jobs and cared for his wife and children. (James asked KHN to withhold his last name so future employers wouldn’t judge him on his addiction history.)

Then, last year, James said, he went to get his prescription refilled and was told Publix no longer stocks Subutex — the medication the DEA considered a “red flag” in Njoku’s case. Publix did not respond to requests for comment.

A decade ago, when James began the medication, he chose Subutex because it was cheaper than Suboxone. Today, most insurance plans cover Suboxone, and the price difference has narrowed somewhat.

James was not eager to change to a potentially pricier medication. And he worried a different drug might disrupt his recovery — a common sentiment among patients in long-term recovery, said Dr. Nathan Mullins, director of addiction medicine fellowship at Mountain Area Health Education Center in North Carolina. Changing their medication is unnecessary and can cause needless anxiety, Mullins said.

Luckily, James found an independent pharmacy that provides Subutex. It’s more expensive, since the new place doesn’t accept his insurance, he said. He pays about $40 a week, compared with $40 a month previously.

But James said it’s worth it.

“I’ve been in 10 rehabs and a million detoxes, and the only thing that has worked for me was one sublingual tablet,” James said. Along with therapy, “this saved my life.”

Kaiser Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues.

Misuse of Rx Opioids Continues to Decline

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

For the fifth consecutive year, misuse of opioid medication fell in 2020, according to a new national survey that further documents the declining role of prescription pain relievers in the U.S. drug abuse crisis.

The annual report by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) estimated that 59.3 million people used an illicit drug last year – about one in every five Americans aged 12 or older. The most commonly used illicit drug was marijuana, which was used by 49.6 million people in 2020. Prescription pain relievers were misused by 9.3 million people, most of them taking a medication that was not their own.

The National Survey on Drug Use and Health classifies “misuse” in broad terms. It means using a prescription drug in any way not directed by a doctor, including using someone else’s prescription or using a drug in greater amounts, more often, or longer than directed by a doctor. That would include someone taking an additional pill during a pain flare.

Nearly two-thirds (64.6%) of respondents who admitted misusing a pain reliever said they did it to relieve physical pain. Only 11.3% said they misused a pain medication to feel good or to get high.  

Although the rate of illicit drug use has been steadily rising in the United States for many years, the misuse of prescription pain relievers has fallen by nearly 30% since 2015, most likely a reflection of fewer prescriptions, decreased supply, and the availability of other illicit drugs. An estimated 3.3% of Americans misused a pain medication in 2020.

% MISUSE RATES FOR PRESCRIPTION PAIN RELIEVERS

SOURCE: SAMHSA

Hydrocodone was the prescription pain reliever most likely to be misused, followed by oxycodone, codeine and tramadol. Most people who misused pain medication said they did not have a prescription of their own, and obtained the drug from a friend or relative (47.2%) or bought it from a drug dealer or stranger (6.2%).  

A nationally representative sample of over 36,000 people participated in the annual SAMHSA survey. Due to the pandemic, most of the respondents participated online due to concerns about conducting interviews in person.

While anti-opioid activists have long claimed that opioid medication frequently leads to heroin use, the SAMHSA survey found there was little association between the two drugs.

“In 2020, the majority of the 9.3 million misusers of prescription pain relievers misused only prescription pain relievers in the past year (8.6 million people), but they had not used heroin. An estimated 667,000 people misused prescription pain relievers and used heroin in the past year, and 235,000 people had used heroin in the past year but had not misused prescription pain relievers,” SAMHSA reported.

A record 96,779 drug deaths were reported in the U.S. over a 12-month period ending in March 2021. The vast majority of the overdoses involved illicit fentanyl and other street drugs. Although the DEA recently issued a public safety alert warning of a surge in counterfeit pills made with illicit fentanyl, the agency has proposed further cuts in the legal supply of prescription opioids in 2022.

Focus on Opioid Crisis Overlooks Rise in Stimulant Deaths

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

While much of the nation was focused on the opioid crisis, new research shows that another drug epidemic was taking the lives of U.S. military veterans.

University of Michigan researchers say the rate of veteran overdose deaths involving cocaine, methamphetamine and other stimulants tripled from 2012 to 2018. Most of the veterans did not receive any substance abuse treatment in the year before they died.

“We have been so focused on opioids that we are missing the tremendous increase in people who are using multiple substances, as well as those using stimulants only, when we know that many people don’t stick to just one substance,” says lead author Lara Coughlin, PhD, a psychologist and an assistant professor in the U-M Department of Psychiatry. “The fact that so many of those who died of an overdose had not received substance use disorder treatment is especially concerning.”

Coughlin and her colleagues reviewed the medical records of 3,631 veterans who died from overdoses involving stimulants, and found that about two-thirds of the deaths involved cocaine. Over half of the stimulant deaths (54.1%) also involved another substance, usually alcohol or an illicit opioid such as heroin or fentanyl. Prescription opioids were involved in less than 26% of the stimulant-related overdoses.

Researchers called the tripling of stimulant deaths “an escalating public health crisis” that deserves more attention.

“Recent trends show stark increases in stimulant-involved overdoses, with the majority of these overdoses deaths involving multiple classes of substances. These more complex, polysubstance-involved overdose deaths necessitate an expansion from a singular opioid-centric focus to include other substances and consideration of the role of stimulant use on overdose risk to inform effective prevention and treatment efforts,” researchers reported in the journal Addiction.

The authors noted there are few medication-based treatments to help people reduce their use of methamphetamine or cocaine, while multiple medications are available to treat those with opioid or alcohol use disorders.

Better access to treatment was especially needed for veterans in rural areas and those who are homeless. About one-third of all the overdose deaths involving stimulants were in Black veterans, as were two-thirds of the deaths from cocaine alone.

In addition to the risk of overdose, researchers say people who use methamphetamine or cocaine are at greater risk of heart damage. About 62% of the overdoses involving stimulants were among veterans aged 45 to 64.

“We need to build better awareness of the role of stimulants as a risk factor for overdose, and of the need for those who have stimulant use disorders to be referred for treatment, regardless if they are also using opioids,” said Coughlin. “We know that cocaine and methamphetamine are much more likely to be adulterated with fentanyl or other synthetic opioids now, so those who use them need to be equipped with rescue doses of naloxone to use and need to know about the risk for overdose in case they or someone they’re with experiences an unexpected, life-threatening reaction.”

The rise in stimulant deaths has not occurred in a vacuum. In the first half of 2019, data from 24 states and the District of Columbia showed that stimulants were involved in 5 out of 11 fatal overdoses. The CDC issued a Health Alert Network Advisory last year about a record number of overdoses, due in part to an acceleration in stimulant-related deaths.

Is DEA Practicing Medicine Without a License?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Tomorrow the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration holds another Prescription Drug Take Back Day, a campaign that encourages people to help combat drug addiction and overdoses by disposing of their unneeded medication at thousands of drop-off locations nationwide.

It’s also a day the DEA uses to further stigmatize the prescription drugs that millions of Americans rely on to control their pain and have functional lives.

“The majority of opioid addictions in America start with prescription pills found in medicine cabinets at home. What’s worse, criminal drug networks are exploiting the opioid crisis by making and falsely marketing deadly, fake pills as legitimate prescriptions, which are now flooding U.S. communities,” DEA Administrator Anne Milgram said in a statement. “I urge Americans to do their part to prevent prescription pill misuse: simply take your unneeded medications to a local collection site.”

The DEA’s campaign to reduce the supply of opioid medication goes well beyond drug take back days. In 2022, the agency is planning to cut production quotas for oxycodone, hydrocodone and other widely used opioid pain relievers. If the proposed quotas published this week in the Federal Register are adopted – and past history indicates they will be – it’ll be the sixth consecutive year the DEA has reduced the supply of opioid medication. 

During that period, production quotas have fallen by 63% for oxycodone and 69% for hydrocodone. And opioid prescribing has fallen to levels not seen in 20-years.

But with drug overdoses climbing to record highs, critics say there is no evidence the DEA’s strategy is working. And they are alarmed that a law enforcement agency is setting policies that affect the healthcare choices of Americans -- in effect, practicing medicine without a license.

“I think a very strong argument can be made that DEA is inappropriately exercising medical judgment based on their reasoning for supporting another production reduction for opioid analgesics,” says Dr. Chad Kollas, a palliative care specialist in Florida. “Federal policy has encouraged blind reductions in opioid prescribing, so for DEA to cite that trend as evidence for a reduced need for the medical supply of opioid analgesics is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

“Reduced prescribing has not led to a reduction in overdose deaths involving opioids, but rather has been associated with an increase in overdose deaths and suicides in patients with chronic pain who have been forced off their pain medications. Federal opioid policy calling for non-focused, reduced opioid prescribing has been an abject failure.” 

18.88% Decline in ‘Medical Need’

Under federal law, the DEA is required to annually set production quotas for opioids and other controlled substances. It does so after consulting with the Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and other federal agencies to establish the amount of drugs needed for medical, industrial and scientific purposes.  

"The responsibility to provide these estimates of legitimate medical needs resides with FDA. FDA provides DEA with its predicted estimates of medical usage for selected controlled substances based on information available to them at a specific point in time in order to meet statutory requirements,” DEA explained in the Federal Register.

“With regard to medical usage of schedule II opioids, FDA predicts levels of medical need for the United States will decline on average 18.88 percent between calendar years 2021 and 2022. These declines are expected to occur across a variety of schedule II opioids including fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, and oxymorphone."

Asked to comment on the DEA’s statement, an FDA spokesperson said the agency sent a letter to the DEA in April 2021 using pharmaceutical sales data from prior years to create “statistical forecasting models to estimate medical need for the next two years.” The FDA letter never actually used the 18.88% estimate, that was a figure apparently calculated by the DEA itself.

“In the letter FDA provided an estimate for need of each individual active ingredient in various opioid medications for 2021 and 2022. It appears the DEA estimated the 18.88% decrease as an average across the list of opioid active ingredients, presumably based on the estimates we provided.  We do not disagree with their forecast for this decreasing trend of opioid need,” the FDA spokesperson wrote in an email to PNN.

Opioid ‘Red Flags’

In its statement in the Federal Register, DEA also said it relies extensively on data from prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) to find “red flags” that may indicate a drug is being abused or diverted. The DEA is particularly concerned about daily opioid doses that exceed 240 morphine milligram equivalents (MME). That’s a very high dose for most people – and well above the CDC opioid guideline’s recommended limit of 90 MME.

“DEA believes that accounting for quantities in excess of 240 MME daily allows for consideration of oncology patients with legitimate medical needs for covered controlled substance prescriptions in excess of 90 MME daily. Higher dosages place individuals at higher risk of overdose and death. Numerous dispensings of prescriptions with dosages exceeding 240 MME daily may indicate diversion such as illegal distribution of controlled substances, or prescribing outside the usual course of professional practice,” the DEA said.

Where does the 240 MME threshold come from? That’s apparently another case of the DEA coming up with its own estimates to determine whether a dose is medical necessary. It certainly doesn’t come from the CDC guideline, which was never meant to include patients suffering from cancer pain or those in palliative care.

“The DEA is misapplying the CDC opioid guidelines, which were explicitly not meant to apply to patients receiving palliative care,” Dr. Kollas told PNN. “Moreover, it’s disingenuous for DEA to infer that patients receiving higher doses of opioid analgesics are diverting them, when the vast majority of opioid overdose deaths arise from illicit fentanyl in counterfeit pills.”

Just how serious is the drug diversion problem? Not so serious at all, according to the DEA’s own National Drug Threat Assessment, an annual report that for years has said that less than 1% of legally prescribed opioids are diverted.  

“The number of opioid dosage units available on the retail market and opioid thefts and losses
reached their lowest levels in nine years,” the DEA’s 2020 report found.

The same report also found that illicit fentanyl, not prescriptions opioids, is “primarily responsible for fueling the ongoing opioid crisis.” That’s a view shared by the American Medical Association, which declared in 2020 that “the nation no longer has a prescription opioid-driven epidemic.”

‘Stop Punishing Pain Patients’

If that makes you wonder why the DEA is so intent on further reducing the supply of opioids, you’re not alone.

“This is pure insanity. The scientific data from the CDC & NIH (National Institutes of Health) show that the overdose crisis is NOT due to prescription opioid analgesics,” wrote Chuck Robertson, one of hundreds who left comments in the Federal Register on the DEA proposal. “We are in the midst of the worst supply chain crisis in modern history, so you want to continue to cut back on production? All this is doing is putting hospitals and pharmacies at risk of being short medications that people need to control pain.”

“Please don’t cut production quotas of the opioids listed. There are hundreds of stories of people who need opioid medication therapy to even live at the most basic of functionality,” said Michelle Stifle, a chronic pain patient for 22 years. “This inhumane treatment is discriminatory. Stop punishing pain patients for the faults of others.” 

“Please do not cut the quotas anymore. My wife has several autoimmune diseases that cause horrible pain. She was completely cut off of her pain meds after almost 20 years of use,” said Jeffrey Smith. “She never took more than prescribed and never abused them. It allowed her to live somewhat normally. Now she suffers every day and has no life. I'm afraid the time is coming she won't be able to take the pain anymore.” 

“I was forced tapered off my pain meds after taking them responsibly for 17 years. I now spend 75 percent of time in bed. I cannot function and am in constant pain,” said Shelly Allen. “I recently tore my rotator cuff and couldn't even get a few days’ worth. Where there may have been overprescribing there is now underprescribing. It's my body, why can't I choose my own pain relief in reasonable doses?”

“We don't need more cuts to the supply of opiates. It doesn't help avoid addiction or address it. All cutting the supply further will do is promote health care rationing,” wrote Amber Smith. “Opiates are necessary for surgery and other medical needs. Would the DEA ever suggest cutting the supply of chemotherapy or insulin? No, yet those are every bit as necessary to patients as opiates are.”

The DEA did not respond to a request for comment on this story. To leave your comment on the DEA’s proposed 2022 production quotas, click here. Public comments must be received by November 17.

The Rx Opioid Most Likely To Be Misused May Surprise You

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

For well over a decade, addiction treatment providers and public health officials have been touting the benefits of buprenorphine, an opioid that can treat both pain and addiction. When combined with naloxone in drugs like Suboxone that treat opioid use disorder (OUD), buprenorphine reduces cravings for opioids and lowers the risk of abuse.    

But a new study published in JAMA Network Open suggests that someone is far more likely to misuse buprenorphine than other opioids. In fact, the misuse rate for buprenorphine is over two times higher than misuse rates for hydrocodone, oxycodone and other opioid pain medications.

Researchers at the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted the study, looking at data from nearly 215,000 people who participated in the National Surveys on Drug Use and Health from 2015 to 2019.

Respondents were asked if they misused prescription opioids “in any way that a doctor did not direct you to use them.” If they used someone else’s prescription or took opioids in greater amounts or more often than they were told by a doctor, that was considered “misuse.”

Researchers crunched the numbers and found that the vast majority of people do not misuse opioid pain medication and take it as directed. Oxycodone, for example, was misused by 12.7% of respondents who took it, followed by hydromorphone (11.8%), hydrocodone (11.6%), and prescription fentanyl (11.5%). Tramadol (7.8%) was misused the least.  

Addiction treatment drugs were misused the most. Buprenorphine was misused by 29.2% of the people who took it, followed by methadone at 22.2 percent. It’s not uncommon for someone getting OUD treatment to have relapses, so perhaps that finding is not altogether surprising.

% MISUSE RATES FOR PRESCRIPTION OPIOIDS

SOURCE: JAMA NETWORK OPEN

Although buprenorphine is misused at a rate over two times higher than other opioids, researchers chose to focus on the positive: a recent downward trend in buprenorphine misuse, despite increases in the number of patients receiving buprenorphine treatment.

“In 2019, nearly three-fourths of US adults reporting past-year buprenorphine use did not misuse their prescribed buprenorphine, and most who misused reported using prescription opioids without having their own prescriptions. These findings underscore the need to pursue actions that expand access to buprenorphine-based OUD treatment, to develop strategies to monitor and reduce buprenorphine misuse,” researchers concluded.

What Is Misuse?

Every study has its flaws, and this one is no exception. Findings based on self-reported survey results are subject to poor memories, recall bias and concerns about stigma. The researchers’ broad definition of “misuse” could also result in a diagnosis of OUD when none actually exists, according to a pain management expert.

“It is not really clear what any of the data means clinically because of the very broad definition of the word misuse,” said Lynn Webster, MD, Senior Fellow at the Center for U.S. Policy (CUSP) and Chief Medical Officer of PainScript. “Behavior of taking an extra pill to control pain, despite it not being specifically directed by the prescribing provider, could be described as ‘misuse.’ This is not necessarily harmful, even if it is inappropriate. The implication is that simply taking an additional pill is an indication of OUD behavior. That would not be an appropriate characterization of the behavior. 

“In fact, the authors report the most common reason to misuse medication is to relieve pain in the OUD and non-OUD groups. This may imply that most people who are misusing their medications are experiencing undertreated pain.” 

The JAMA study is not the first to report a high rate of buprenorphine misuse. The DEA’s 2020 National Drug Threat Assessment reported that buprenorphine is misused more often than methadone or hydrocodone, and that it was poised to replace oxycodone as the most commonly misused prescription opioid. Unlike the JAMA study, the DEA said the misuse of buprenorphine was increasing, not declining.   

Study Finds Childhood Trauma Increases Risk of Opioid Addiction

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Several studies have found that if you experienced physical or emotional trauma as a child you are more likely to have migraines, fibromyalgia and other painful conditions as an adult.

Australian researchers have taken that theory a step further, with a small study that found adults with a history of childhood abuse or neglect are more likely to feel the pleasurable effects of opioids, putting them at greater risk of addiction.

That finding, recently published in the journal Addiction Biology, is based on a double-blind, placebo-controlled study that compared the effects of morphine on 52 healthy people – 27 with a history of severe childhood trauma and a control group of 25 who had no such experiences as children.

Participants in both groups were given an injection of morphine or a placebo dose, and then asked how it made them feel. People in the trauma group reported more euphoria or feeling high and more “liking” of morphine. They also felt less nauseous and dizzy after taking the drug compared to the non-trauma control group.

“Those with childhood trauma preferred the opioid drug morphine and they felt more euphoric and had a stronger desire for another dose,” lead author Molly Carlyle, PhD, a research fellow at The University of Queensland, said in a statement. “Those with no childhood trauma were more likely to dislike the effects and feel dizzy or nauseous.

“This is the first study to link childhood trauma with the effects of opioids in people without histories of addiction, suggesting that childhood trauma may lead to a greater sensitivity to the positive and pleasurable effects of opioids.”

Researchers say people in the trauma group were significantly more likely to have a history of anxiety or depression, and to use over-the-counter pain relievers regularly.  They were also more likely to report stress, loneliness and less social support and self-compassion than the control group.

“One possible explanation for the differing responses to morphine is that childhood trauma affects the development of the endogenous opioid system – a pain-relieving system that is sensitive to chemicals including endorphins, our natural opioids,” Carlyle explained. "It's possible that childhood trauma dampens that system.

“When a baby cries and is comforted, endorphins are released, so if loving interactions like this don't happen, this system may develop differently and could become more sensitive to the rewarding effects of opioid drugs."

Pain was also measured during the study, with participants immersing a hand in cold water both before and after receiving morphine. Researchers measured how long it took for them to find the cold water painful and how long it took before they pulled their hand out. Morphine was found to increase pain threshold and tolerance in both groups, regardless of whether they experienced childhood trauma.

“The findings of this study are a stepping stone in highlighting the role of childhood trauma in OUD (opioid use disorder), emphasising the need to address trauma symptoms in this vulnerable group, and targeting early interventions at traumatised young people,” researchers concluded. “These findings have many clinical and social implications including reducing the guilt and shame common amongst those with OUD about the reasons behind the development of this damaging addiction.”

Researchers Warn of Deadly New Illicit Opioid

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new illicit opioid that is 20 times more potent than fentanyl has been linked to at least eight fatal overdoses in the U.S. in the last month, according to a public safety alert released by a Pennsylvania research laboratory.

The Center for Forensic Science Research & Education (CFSRE) said its scientists detected N-pyrrolidino etonitazene -- also known as etonitazepyne -- in eight blood samples taken during recent death investigations in West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Florida and Colorado.  Four of the deaths occurred in West Virginia.

“The toxicity of N-pyrrolidino etonitazene has not been examined or reported but recent association with death among people who use drugs leads professionals to believe this synthetic opioid retains the potential to cause widespread harm and is of public health concern. Identifications of N-pyrrolidino etonitazene have also been reported recently from agencies in Europe,” the safety alert said.

Etonitazepyne is a synthetic opioid that is chemically similar to etonitazene, another powerful narcotic that started appearing in illicit drug markets and counterfeit pills in the U.S. and Canada last year.  While etonitazene is classified as an illegal Schedule I controlled substance by the DEA, etonitazepyne has not specifically been scheduled. Several websites even list it for sale for “chemical research.”

"The current drug landscape in the United States is unstable and unpredictable – especially the opioid market – which can ultimately lead to deadly outcomes," said Dr. Alex Krotulski, an associate director at CFSRE. "The purpose of this public alert is to raise awareness about a new and already deadly synthetic opioid so that way people who use drugs are able to modify use patterns and so that laboratories know to test for this new drug in their states or jurisdictions.”

Etonitazepyne may be new to law enforcement, coroners and public health officials, but illicit drug users have been warning each other about the drug for several months in online message boards.

“I got a report about an overdose with only 1 MG of Etonitazepyne (snorted) that caused a pretty high tolerance user to become unconscious and stopped breathing, and he had to be rescued from paramedics,” a poster said on Reddit.

“Everyone needs to be careful with this one. It's not for anyone who has no tolerance to opioids, and can still be dangerous for those who do,” another poster wrote.

Addiction Is the Problem, Not Pain

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

The war on drugs always seems to target pain sufferers. We are the number one example of what happens when someone is given opioids. We are the villains, our pain the “gateway” to addiction -- a fiction that no one seems able to dispel, regardless of the evidence and common sense.

Why are we the bad guys? Is it because we are the easiest to single out?

Maybe.

I was watching an episode of the old TV show “ER.” One of the main characters, Dr. John Carter (Noah Wyle), was stabbed repeatedly by a psychotic patient. His pain was horrendous, his need for opioids obvious. Dr. Carter survived the attack, but became addicted. In one scene, he even goes to the extreme of injecting himself with fentanyl.

I began to recall other shows where the plot was the same: injury, opioids to manage the acute pain, and then full-blown addiction.

In an episode of “The Golden Girls,” Betty White's character, Rose Nyland, discloses she was addicted to pain pills. She started taking them 30 years earlier after she injured her back. Her doctor never told her to stop taking them, so she continued using opioids for decades. It was her secret until her roommates figured it out.

It is a shame that TV shows like these don’t include a disclaimer: These characters had acute pain, not chronic. Most people with chronic pain do not become addicted.

It’s a common belief that if you have acute or chronic pain and are given opioids that you will probably become addicted. But has anyone ever studied the two types of pain and their rates of addiction?

I Googled it using the words "chronic pain and addiction vs acute pain and addiction." There were no studies that directly compared the two. The results were either about chronic pain and addiction, or acute pain and addiction. I changed the search terms to “acute pain, opioids, addiction rates.” The results were the same.

Why hasn't anyone looked into the differences in addiction in these two very dissimilar populations?

Why has no one done studies with a population of acute pain patients who became addicted after an injury or surgery? Then compare those rates with chronic pain patients who become addicted?  If they have, I wasn’t able to find them.

Are chronic pain patients being villainized because we are the most visible population?

It is always easier to go after the most desperate and the most vulnerable -- and when it comes to opioids and managing pain, we fit the bill. We will continue to be the bogeyman in the “opioid crisis” until this changes.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

Patients in Addiction Treatment Often Stigmatized by Doctors

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Most chronic pain patients are well aware of the stigma associated with using opioids. A recent PNN survey of over 3,600 pain sufferers found that about a third had been abandoned by a doctor (29%) and many were unable to find a new physician to treat their pain (36%).

“I was abandoned by the doctor who did my last operation,” a veteran with CRPS told us. “I should have been put on whatever pain medication possible to ease my pain. I wasn't. I'm not a drug addict and I damn sure don't appreciate being treated like one!”

“The stigma and refusing to treat needs to be addressed. Stigma by pharmacists, doctors and society is cutting life short. Patients have become social pariahs. Severe surgeries are conducted and patient is sent home with Aleve. It’s barbaric, cruel and inhumane,” another patient said.

The stigma also extends to people being treated for opioid use disorder (OUD), according to a new study of patients in the Canadian province of Ontario. Researchers at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto analyzed the health records of nearly 155,000 patients who were discharged by a primary care physician between 2016 and 2017.

The research findings, recently published in PLOS Medicine, found that patients prescribed an addiction treatment drug such as Suboxone or methadone were 45% less likely to find another primary care provider (PCP) in the next year compared to other patients.

"There are considerable barriers to accessing primary care among people who use opioids, and this is most apparent among people who are being treated for an opioid use disorder. This highlights how financial disincentives within the healthcare system, and stigma and discrimination against people who use drugs introduce barriers to high quality care," said lead author Tara Gomes, PhD, a researcher at St. Michael’s Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute.

"Ongoing efforts are needed to address stigma and discrimination faced by people who use opioids within the health care system, and to facilitate access to high quality, consistent primary care services for chronic pain patients and those with OUD.”

Surprisingly, Gomes and her colleagues found that pain patients on long-term opioid therapy in Ontario did not have a harder time finding a new PCP. That finding is at odds with a recent study in the United States, which found that nearly half of primary care practices would not accept new patients who were already taking opioids.

Researchers think the discrepancy may be due to the U.S. having a private healthcare system, where there is a financial incentive to drop patients with complex health needs, as opposed Canada’s publicly funded healthcare system.

During the gap in their primary care coverage, about 5% of Ontario patients on long-term opioids visited an emergency room, suggesting that the loss of a PCP led to further health problems that made them seek care in a hospital. In effect, patient abandonment not only made those people sicker, it shifted the financial burden of their healthcare to someone else.

“Although the structure of primary care differs across North America, our findings suggest that even in a province with a publicly funded healthcare system that has undergone considerable primary care transformation, barriers to care continue to exist for people who use opioids, particularly those with an OUD,” Gomes wrote.

The researchers said insurance reimbursement policies should be reviewed to ensure that they do not lead to the discrimination and stigmatization of patients. Doctors should also be educated on how abandoning or discharging patients can be harmful.

Patient abandonment may have grown worse since Canada adopted a new opioid prescribing guideline in 2017. A 2019 survey of patients by the Chronic Pain Association of Canada found that about a third of patients had either been abandoned by a doctor or their doctor refused to continue prescribing opioids to them.

Overdose Crisis Linked to Poor Mental Health

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A comprehensive new study has found that stress and anxiety are key drivers in the U.S. overdose crisis, with poor mental health increasing the risk of dying from a drug overdose by as much as 39 percent.

"We saw a strong association with mental health and substance abuse disorders, particularly opiates," says co-author Diego Cuadros, PhD, an epidemiologist who directs the University of Cincinnati’s Health Geography and Disease Modeling Laboratory. "What's happening now is we're more than a year into a pandemic. Mental health has deteriorated for the entire population, which means we'll see a surge in opiate overdoses."

Cuadros and his colleagues looked at overdose deaths and socioeconomic data in the U.S. from 2005 to 2017, and identified 25 “hot spots” or sub-epidemics where there was a sizeable increase in drug deaths. In the Southwest, sub-epidemics were driven by methamphetamine and heroin, while overdoses in the Northeast and Midwest were first fueled by heroin, then prescription opioids, and now synthetic opioids such as illicit fentanyl.

U.S. Overdose “Hot Spots”

PLOS ONE

While different substances were often involved in sub-epidemics, researchers say the one thing they all had in common was high levels of physical and mental distress.

"This is a complex epidemic. For HIV we have one virus or agent. Same with malaria. Same with COVID-19. It's a virus," Cuadros said. "But with opioids, we have several agents. At the beginning of the epidemic it was heroin. By 2010 it switched to prescription opiates."

Deaths of Despair

The study, published in PLOS ONE, builds on the so-called “deaths of despair” theory that was first described in 2015 by Princeton researchers Anne Case and Angus Deaton, who found that the reduced life expectancy of middle-aged white Americans was linked to substance abuse, unemployment, limited education, divorce, depression and loss of social connections.

The new study found that young white males aged 25 to 29 were most at risk of a fatal opioid overdose, followed by white males aged 30 to 34. In recent years, they were joined by black males aged 30 to 34 who also have an elevated risk of dying from an overdose. Those age groups do not fit the typical profile of a pain patient on prescription opioids, who is usually older and has an age-related disability such as arthritis.

“For the past 20 years, seniors over age 62 have had the highest rates of doctor-prescribed opioid pain relievers, while sustaining the lowest and mostly stable rates of opioid overdose related mortality. During the same period, overdose mortality more than tripled among adults age 25 to 34, who receive far fewer prescriptions than seniors,” says Richard “Red” Lawhern, PhD, a patient advocate who has long argued that the demographics of the overdose crisis prove it is not being driven by opioid medication. 

“Drug abuse and addiction are instead driven by complex socio-economic factors that some investigators have called ‘a crisis of hopelessness.’ Structural unemployment and poverty have rendered some populations more vulnerable to drug abuse than others,” said Lawhern.

“Hot spots of high mortality occur primarily in rural counties of the Rust Belt, deep South and West, with a sprinkling in inner cities also paralyzed by poverty. Communities are being hollowed out and families are failing due to a national failure to invest to replace infrastructure and mining jobs formerly held by high school educated men.”   

A notable holdout in the “deaths of despair” theory is Andrew Kolodny, MD, an addiction treatment specialist and longtime critic of opioid prescribing who is the founder of the newly renamed Health Professionals for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP).

“The vast majority of drug overdose deaths are occurring in people with the disease of opioid addiction, not necessarily people who are drinking or using drugs driven by socioeconomic factors,” said Kolodny in a recent webinar. “The deaths of despair framing, while provocative, is unlikely to explain the main sources of the fatal drug epidemic and that efforts to improve economic conditions in distressed locations, while desirable for other reasons, are not likely to yield significant reductions in drug mortality.”

Kolodny is not an economist, epidemiologist or pain management specialist. He is a well-paid expert witness in opioid litigation cases – lawsuits that depend on a public narrative that excess opioid prescribing, not mental health problems, led to the addiction and overdose crisis. Maintaining that narrative is becoming harder, with opioid prescribing in the U.S. at 20-year lows and overdose deaths at record highs, fueled in part by economic and social issues exacerbated by the pandemic.

In other comments during the webinar, Kolodny said the CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline was “a bit wishy washy” because it only said that opioids were not the preferred treatment for chronic pain. Kolodny said a Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense guideline that came out a year later was “a lot better” because it advised doctors not to begin long-term opioid therapy on any new patients.    

Instead of opioids, the DOD guideline recommends exercise, yoga and cognitive behavioral therapy to treat chronic pain, along with non-opioid drugs such as gabapentin.

Study Estimates Two Million Americans Use Kratom

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A new study estimates that less than one percent of Americans -- about two million people --- use kratom, an herbal supplement that’s growing in popularity as a treatment for pain, depression, anxiety and addiction.

The study, one of the first to look at kratom use in the general population, is based on data from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health – the first year the annual survey asked respondents about kratom.

Researchers at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine looked at data from over 56,000 people who participated in the survey and estimated that 0.7 percent of adults and adolescents in the U.S. used kratom in the past year.

Kratom use was more likely by people who also use cannabis, stimulants and cocaine, and was particularly common among those who misuse prescription opioids. About 10 percent of people diagnosed with opioid use disorder reported kratom use.

“It was not surprising at all that such a large portion of people with opioid use disorder use kratom. What I didn’t expect was to find kratom use to be independently linked to cannabis use disorder,” said study author Joseph Palamar, PhD, an associate professor of population health at NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

“A lot of people who use substances to get high also use other substances to get high — alone or in combination. If anything, I hope that results of this paper demonstrate not only that a lot of people with opioid use disorder use kratom, but also a lot of people who use other drugs have been adding this substance to their drug repertoires for whatever reason.”

Men, white people, and those with depression and serious mental illness were also more likely to report using kratom. Teenagers and adults over 50 were less likely to use it.

The findings are similar to those in a 2016 PNN survey of over 6,000 kratom users. A little over half said they primarily used kratom for pain relief, while others used it as a treatment for anxiety (14%), opioid withdrawal (9%), depression (9%) and alcoholism (3%).  Over 90% said kratom was “very effective” in treating their medical condition.   

“A lot of people who use kratom rave about its ability to decrease opioid withdrawal, but kratom itself can be addicting so people need to be aware and be careful. Kratom might indeed be able to serve as a useful tool for people seeking to get off opioids, but I think more research is needed to determine exactly how it should be used and how to use it safely,” Palamar said in an email to PNN.

The study, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, notes that over 150 overdose deaths linked to kratom have been reported. But most of those overdoses also involved other drugs such as illicit fentanyl, heroin and cocaine, or prescription drugs such as benzodiazepines and psychiatric medications.    

“Given the high number of poisonings involving kratom combined with other drugs, I hope that at least people who decide to use it try to avoid combining it with other substances,” Palamar said.

Kratom comes from the leaves of a tree that grows in southeast Asia, where kratom has been used for centuries as a natural stimulant and pain reliever. Kratom can be sold legally in most U.S. states, but vendors can run into trouble if they claim it can be used to treat medical conditions. The FDA says it has “serious concerns” about kratom because of its opioid-like properties.

A 2020 study funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse concluded that kratom is an effective treatment for pain, helps users reduce their use of opioids, and has a low risk of adverse effects.

The American Kratom Association, an advocacy group for kratom consumers and vendors, claims that 10 to 16 million Americans use kratom. That estimate is based on exports to the U.S. reported by kratom growers in Indonesia.

Pain Patients Worried About CDC Expanding Opioid Guideline

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

 “These guidelines have been a disaster for people with chronic pain.” 

“The guideline is flat out wrong on facts, wrong on science and wrong on medical ethics.” 

“The CDC has no qualifications or authority to develop pain management guidelines, especially those pertaining to opioid therapy.” 

Those are just a few of the comments we received from nearly 4,200 pain patients and healthcare providers who participated in PNN’s survey on impending changes to the CDC's opioid prescribing guideline. 

“It has been misunderstood, misapplied, bastardized and weaponized to use against chronic pain patients,” is how one pain sufferer put it.  

People obviously have strong opinions about the CDC guideline. Can it be changed and made more effective? Or should the entire guideline be thrown out? 

Nearly 75% of the people we surveyed believe the guideline should be withdrawn or revoked. That’s not likely to happen, however, as the CDC completes a lengthy review and update of the guideline that started two years ago.

If anything, the agency seems intent on expanding the guideline to include specific recommendations for treating short-term acute pain, migraine and possibly other pain conditions such as fibromyalgia. 

That’s the route recently taken by two advisory panels in Europe, which released guidelines that are even stricter on the use of opioids than the CDC’s.

WHAT SHOULD BE DONE WITH CDC OPIOID GUIDELINE?

This month the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence advised doctors not to prescribe opioids or any other pain reliever for fibromyalgia, chronic headache, musculoskeletal pain and other types of “primary chronic pain” for which there is no known cause.

In March, the European Pain Federation (EFIC) released similar guidelines, saying “opioids should not be prescribed for people with chronic primary pain as they do not work for these patients.”

At least two members of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), an anti-opioid activist group, served as consultants to the EFIC in making its recommendation. PROP has long urged the CDC to make a similar statement in its guideline.

“This recommendation should explicitly state that opioids should be avoided for fibromyalgia, chronic headache and chronic low back pain,” PROP’s board wrote in a 2015 letter to the CDC’s Dr. Deborah Dowell, one of the co-authors of the 2016 guideline. “We are suggesting this change because evidence-based reviews and expert consensus have found the long-term use of opioids is likely to be counter-productive for fibromyalgia, chronic headache and chronic axial low back pain.”

PROP didn’t get its explicit statement in 2016, but it may be getting another chance as the CDC revises and possibly expands its guideline.

Little Support for Guideline Expansion

In our survey, patients and providers seem to be wary about expanding the guideline to include treatment recommendations for specific conditions. Only about 40% support guidelines for low back pain, fibromyalgia and short-term acute pain. Many believe the CDC has already gone too far and some wonder where the agency gets the regulatory authority to create guidelines for medical conditions.    

“CDC should never have developed and issued opioid prescribing guideline, as such work falls outside CDC's mission and expertise. If guidelines are needed, FDA should write,” one respondent said.

“The CDC guideline would be fine, if if were not being weaponized. There is nothing wrong with having guidelines for non-specialists. However, insurance companies have grabbed hold of it and are now using it to deny coverage of what they think is outside the guidelines,” said another.  

“Pain and it’s treatment should have a guideline but with the acknowledgment that its never one size fits all,” a patient wrote. “Some standardized measures are useful to help physicians make decisions in acute, cancer, non-cancer pain, and non-narcotic options should be sought first.”

SHOULD CDC MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREATING LOW BACK PAIN, FIBROMYLAGIA AND OTHER PAIN CONDITIONS?

Strong Opposition to 90 MME Limit

If there’s anything that patients and providers want changed, it’s the guideline’s recommended dose limit of 90 MME (morphine milligram equivalent). Although voluntary, the daily dose limit has been rigidly applied by many doctors, pharmacists, insurers and regulators. As a result, patients who’ve taken higher doses of opioids for years — and done it safely — suddenly found themselves being tapered to 90 MME or less.

“My spouse has Ehlers Danlos Syndrome. Her chronic severe pain kept her bedridden for years until a doctor found an opioid regimen that worked. She had her life back and was able to function out of bed. This worked for over 12 years,” one man told us.

“Now, the CDC guidelines have caused local practitioners to require cutting her MME equivalent per day from about 300 to 90. They fear liability. When they discuss tapering and are confronted with the question, ‘But this is a genetic tissue disorder, it is not going to taper away,’ they have nothing to say except to point the finger at the CDC and say they are afraid of being sued. This is going to put her back in bed and, I'm afraid, kill her.”

Asked what changes should be made to the CDC’s recommended dose limit of 90 MME, nearly 87% said there should be no limit on opioid dosages.

“My doctor drastically reduced my medication and I suffer for it. Can hardly walk, can't function like I want to, no one cares as long as its 90 MME. Doesn't matter if I require higher dose and have tolerated it just fine for years,” a patient said.

“I was force tapered in 2016. I've been unable to fill legitimate prescriptions several times and denied meds by my insurance unless I use what they say is equivalent,” a patient told us.

“I was forced tapered from 550mg down to 90mg without my consent,” another patient wrote.

“Pretty much told that I would either take the lower prescribed dose or suck it up without pain relief,” said another.

WHAT CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE TO CDC'S DOSE LIMIT OF 90 MME?

“All of a sudden you can't have your regular prescription. Doesn't matter if it effects my health adversely. Blood pressure through the roof, NEVER had that problem before with it, but keep that 90 MME no matter what. Doctors sympathize but they are too scared to help you,” another patient said. “This rule doesn't help chronic pain patients at all and it doesn't stop overdoses. It needs to change.”

“My physician has been told by the hospital board that they have to reduce the amount of pain medication to ALL patients to an equivalent of 90mg. I have been taken off 70mg of my pain medications that I have taken for over 20 years,” wrote yet another patient.

“The doctor has told me he must continue to taper me more. He knows I am suffering but his hands are tied. The CDC must allow physicians that are experts in the pain management field to treat their patients as individuals. I have a lot more to say but can not type anymore as it causes me great amount of pain to use my hands and fingers.”

We received thousands of comments like these from patients, doctors, caretakers, spouses and loved ones.

One of the more poignant ones came from an intractable pain patient who considers herself lucky to have a doctor who slowly tapered her down to 90 MME. That doctor has now retired. She fears for her future and those of other patients.

“It’s my feeling we’ll look back on all this one day and realize this was in every aspect of the word a genocide; an attack on the weakest of us, the ones who most needed protection, but were mercilessly denied it.”

— Intractable Pain Patient

“I’ve managed to get to 90 MME from a dose much higher, as I was most definitely a high dose patient, but it only happened because I had good care for all those years,” she said. “I experience more nerve pain now than ever before, and I still very much fear being cut off.

“God bless any doctor or human being who’s willing to support us during this terrible most tragic of times. We’re being put in a position to lose all semblance of pain management for good if this downward spiral is allowed to continue. That’s such an inhumane and ugly thing to do, after countless lovely vibrant lives have been snuffed out by the lack of it already. It’s my feeling we’ll look back on all this one day and realize this was in every aspect of the word a genocide; an attack on the weakest of us, the ones who most needed protection, but were mercilessly denied it.”

(PNN’s survey was conducted online and through social media from March 15 to April 17. A total of 4,185 people in the United States participated, including 3,926 who identified themselves as chronic, acute or intractable pain patients; 92 doctors or healthcare providers; and 167 people who said they were a caretaker, spouse, loved one or friend of a patient. Thanks to everyone who participated in this valuable survey. To see the full survey findings, click here.)