NSAIDs Preferred for Acute Dental Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) taken alone or in combination with acetaminophen are recommended as first-line treatments for managing short-term acute dental pain in adults and adolescents aged 12 and older, according to a new guideline developed by the American Dental Association (ADA).

Opioid analgesics should only be used when NSAIDs and acetaminophen are insufficient to reduce pain or when NSAIDs are contradicted, according to the ADA guideline, which also warns dentists to avoid “just-in-case” opioid prescribing.    

“Providing prescribing guidelines for acute dental pain management is an important step towards improving patient treatment and outcomes,” Marta Sokolowska, PhD, deputy center director for substance use and behavioral health at the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a press release. “We hope this clinical practice guideline will reduce the risk of opioid addiction, overdose and diversion.”

Opioids were once routinely prescribed to dental patients after a surgical tooth extraction or even a simple toothache. In 1998, dentists wrote 15.5% of all prescriptions for immediate release opioids in the United States. Many of those prescriptions are now considered high risk because the daily dose was over 50 MME (morphine milligram equivalents) or the amount prescribed exceeded a 3-day supply.

After reviewing 82 clinical trials involving tooth extractions, the ADA’s guideline panel found that NSAIDs were more effective than opioids in reducing post-operative pain.

“When managing acute dental pain, there are several reasons to consider alternatives to opioids. First, evidence suggests that opioids may not be the best approach to managing what is often inflammation-related acute dental pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) would target the source of the pain, whereas opioids would not,” the guideline cautions.

Only in “rare instances” when pain control is inadequate with NSAIDs does the guideline recommend low doses of oxycodone or hydrocodone, in combination with acetaminophen. Opioids can also be used when NSAIDs are contradicted due to health issues, such as a patient having cardiovascular problems or a bleeding ulcer.

“When opioids are prescribed, clinicians should obtain informed consent from the patient (or the parent or guardian in the case of minors) with detailed information about potential opioid undesirable effects. This is particularly critical in adolescents and young adults who are at increased risk of subsequent misuse and substance use disorder even after a single prescription,” the guideline says.

This is the second of two ADA guidelines on acute dental pain management. A previous set of recommendations for pediatric patients under the age of 12 was published in 2023. It also recommends NSAIDs and acetaminophen as preferred analgesics. Opioids such as codeine and tramadol are not recommended for children under any circumstances.

The risk of long-term opioid use after a tooth extraction is relatively rare. A 2018 study of over 70,000 teens and young adults who had their wisdom teeth removed found that only 1.3% were still being prescribed opioids months after their initial prescription by a dentist.

Migraine Sufferers Rank Triptans as Most Helpful Medication

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A large new study that compared the effectiveness of acute migraine medications found that triptans are two to five times more helpful than ibuprofen and acetaminophen in treating migraine attacks. Triptans were also found to be more effective than Excedrin migraine, opioids, and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

The study used a unique methodology, gathering data on over 3 million migraine attacks reported by over 278,000 people in the US, UK and Canada who used a smartphone app during a six-year period. The Migraine Buddy app allows users to monitor the frequency of their migraine attacks, triggers and symptoms, and rate how “helpful” or “not helpful” their medications are.

“There are many treatment options available to those with migraine. However, there is a lack of head-to-head comparisons of the effectiveness of these treatment options,” said lead author Chia-Chun Chiang, MD, a neurologist who specializes in Headache Medicine and Vascular Neurology at the Mayo Clinic. “These results confirm that triptans should be considered earlier for treating migraine, rather than reserving their use for severe attacks.”

Chiang and his colleagues looked at a total of 25 medications among seven drug classes. Different dosages and medication combinations were combined in their analysis. Newer drugs that inhibit calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRP) were excluded because they were not in wide enough use during the study period.

How Patients Rated Effectiveness of Acute Migraine Drugs

NEUROLOGY

The study findings, published in the journal Neurology, ranked several triptans (eletriptan, zolmitriptan, sumatriptan, rizatriptan, naratriptan, almotriptan and frovatriptan) as the most helpful medications, with about 75% effectiveness.

By comparison, acetaminophen (paracetamol) was helpful only 37% of the time.

“Our results strongly support the use of triptans, the first class of migraine-specific medication for the acute treatment of migraine,” researchers reported. “In practice, NSAIDs and acetaminophen are generally the first-line medications utilized for mild to moderate headache, and migraine-specific medications are often reserved for moderate to severe migraine attacks, which could potentially result in under-utilization of triptans or delayed treatment during migraine attacks.”

Participants found NSAID’s more effective than acetaminophen, with ketorolac helpful 62% of the time, indomethacin helpful 57% of the time, diclofenac helpful 56% of the time and ibuprofen helpful 42% of the time.

Excedrin migraine was effective only about half the time, about the same as tramadol and codeine. Opioids are usually not recommended for migraine because they’ve been associated with medication overuse headache.

“For people whose acute migraine medication is not working for them, our hope is that this study shows that there are many alternatives that work for migraine, and we encourage people to talk with their doctors about how to treat this painful and debilitating condition,” said Chiang.

Migraine affects about 39 million people in the United States and is the second leading cause of disability worldwide, according to the American Migraine Foundation.  

Another recent study that compared migraine prevention drugs found that two medications usually used to treat depression and high cholesterol are just as effective as the new CGRP inhibitors. Amitriptyline is a tricyclic antidepressant, while simvastatin is a statin. Both drugs are used off-label for migraine prevention and cost substantially less than CGRP drugs.

Chronic Pain Riskier Than Smoking for Heart Attack Survivors

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

People recovering from a heart attack who have moderate or severe pain are significantly more likely to die -- even when the pain is not associated with heart disease – according to a large new study that highlights the deadly toll that chronic pain can have on health.

“Pain causes significant loss of function and may lead to disability, all of which contribute to major, global public health issues. Research indicates that pain is linked to higher risk of cardiovascular disease and overall death; however, the impact of pain on death after a heart attack has not yet been examined in large studies,” said lead author Linda Vixner, PhD, an associate professor of medical science at Dalarna University in Sweden.

Vixner and her colleagues analyzed 8.5 years of health data for over 18,300 Swedish adults who had a myocardial infarction (MI) – more commonly known as a heart attack. Their findings, published in the Journal of the American Heart Association, show that pain was common a year after the heart attack, with nearly 45% of participants reporting moderate or extreme pain. About two-thirds of them had persistent or long-term pain.

The effect of pain on mortality was even more pronounced than smoking, a well-known risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cancer and other health problems. Heart attack survivors who reported extreme pain were more than twice as likely to die from any cause during the study period, compared to those who had no pain. Those with moderate pain were 35% more likely to die.

Researchers say the study demonstrates that chronic pain is a major risk factor for health providers to consider when treating a patient recovering from a heart attack.

“Pain severity seems to be an important factor, because mortality among patients with chronic pain is higher than in the general population, especially when chronic pain is severe. In addition, we found that patients with extreme pain were less physically active,” they reported.

“Pain and cardiovascular diseases share many lifestyle‐related risk factors and risk factors related to socioeconomic status, which could be one explanation as to why mortality among patients with pain 1 year after MI was significantly higher than mortality in patients without pain. Pharmaceuticals commonly used in pain treatment (both opioids and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, which could also be a part of the explanation.”

Previous studies have found that long-term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) significantly raises the risk of a heart attack or stroke. The FDA says people with a history of cardiovascular disease are at the greatest risk. But the risk is also present for those who don't have heart problems.

A 2016 Vanderbilt University study found that long-term opioid users are more likely to die from cardiovascular and respiratory problems than they are from accidental overdoses.

NSAIDs May Worsen Arthritis Inflammation

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Ibuprofen, naproxen and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often recommended as safer and more effective pain relievers than opioids. As evidence, anti-opioid activists often cite a 2018 study that found NSAIDs worked “significantly better” than opioids in reducing pain intensity for patients with osteoarthritis.

That study by VA researcher Erin Krebs, MD, is cited nearly a dozen times in the newly revised CDC opioid guideline, which recommends that patients avoid opioids and use topical or oral NSAIDs for osteoarthritis pain.

But according to a new long-term study, NSAIDs may actually worsen inflammation and weaken cartilage in patients with knee osteoarthritis, contributing to a painful joint condition called synovitis.

“The goal of our study was to analyze whether NSAID treatment influences the development or progression of synovitis and to investigate whether cartilage imaging biomarkers, which reflect changes in osteoarthritis, are impacted by NSAID treatment,” says lead author, Johanna Luitjens, MD, a postdoctoral scholar in the Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging at the University of California, San Francisco.

“NSAIDs are frequently used to treat pain, but it is still an open discussion of how NSAID use influences outcomes for osteoarthritis patients. In particular, the impact of NSAIDs on synovitis, or the inflammation of the membrane lining the joint, has never been analyzed using MRI-based structural biomarkers.”

Luitjens and her colleagues enrolled 277 people with moderate to severe osteoarthritis who used NSAIDs for at least one year, comparing them to a control group of 793 patients who were not treated with NSAIDs. All participants underwent an MRI of the knee at the start of the study and had another MRI four years later. 

The results showed no long-term benefits from NSAID use. The initial MRIs found joint inflammation and cartilage quality were worse in the participants taking NSAIDs, and their knee joints deteriorated even more after four years. 

“In this large group of participants, we were able to show that there were no protective mechanisms from NSAIDs in reducing inflammation or slowing down progression of osteoarthritis of the knee joint,” said Luitjens, who will present her findings next week at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).

Luitjens says there are two possible reasons for the ineffectiveness of NSAIDs. One is that the anti-inflammatory effects of NSAIDs may not be sufficient to prevent synovitis. It’s also possible that patients with synovitis who use NSAIDs may be more physically active due to pain relief, which could have worsened their synovitis. 

In either case, Luitjens believes more evidence is needed to support the continued use of NSAIDs as a treatment for osteoarthritis.

“The use of NSAIDs for their anti-inflammatory function has been frequently propagated in patients with osteoarthritis in recent years and should be revisited, since a positive impact on joint inflammation could not be demonstrated,” she said.

The 2018 Krebs study did not look at how NSAIDs affected joint inflammation. It focused mainly on pain intensity, function and quality of life, and found few differences between opioids and NSAIDs, leading Krebs to conclude that opioids were “not superior” to NSAIDs. As my late colleague Roger Chriss pointed out, researchers also found no harmful effects in patients who took opioids for a year. There was no opioid misuse, addiction or overdoses — a detail rarely mentioned in news coverage of the study.

Osteoarthritis is a joint disorder that leads to thinning of cartilage and progressive joint damage. Knee osteoarthritis is quite common and affects over 250 million people worldwide. Nearly 40 percent of Americans over the age of 45 have some degree of knee osteoarthritis.

Pregnant Women Raise Risk of Complications by Using OTC Pain Relievers

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Pregnant women who take over-the-counter pain relievers are one-and-a-half times more likely to have complications, including stillbirth and premature delivery, according to a large new study.

Researchers at the University of Aberdeen analyzed data from over 151,000 pregnancies in the UK from 1985-2015, looking for medical notes indicating the women used paracetamol (acetaminophen), aspirin or the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diclofenac, naproxen and ibuprofen — either alone or in combinations.

The findings, recently published in BMJ Open, show a significantly higher risk of a preterm delivery, neonatal death, low birth weight and other health problems in babies born to mothers who used OTC pain relievers. Neural tube defects of the brain, spine or spinal cord were 64% more likely; while hypospadias, a birth defect affecting the penis, was 27% more likely.

“Over-the-counter analgesics consumption during pregnancy was associated with a substantially higher risk for adverse perinatal health outcomes in the offspring. The use of paracetamol in combination with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs conferred the highest risk,” wrote lead author Aikaterini Zafeiri, PhD. “The increased risks of adverse neonatal outcomes associated with non-prescribed, over-the-counter, analgesics use during pregnancy indicate that healthcare guidance for pregnant women regarding analgesic use need urgent updating.”

One of the more surprising aspects of the study is how use of the five analgesics by pregnant women grew dramatically over the 30-year study period.  In 1985, only 1.8% reported using one of the pain relievers. By 2015, that had grown to 70.6% -- with most of the increase coming in the last seven years of the study.

Although it is believed to be one of the largest and most comprehensive studies of its kind, the research was limited. The duration, dose and stage of the pregnancy when analgesics were consumed were not recorded. The health of the mothers and babies later in life was also not studied.

But given the substantial increase in analgesic use during pregnancy and the higher risk of complications, researchers say more caution is needed on use of the drugs.

“The ease of access to non-prescription painkillers, in combination with availability of misinformation as well as correct information through the internet, raises safety concerns,” said Zafeiri. “It should be reinforced that paracetamol in combination with NSAIDs is associated with a higher risk and pregnant women should always consult their doctor or midwife before taking any over-the-counter drugs. We would encourage a strong reinforcement of the official advice for pregnant women.”   

Previous studies have linked prenatal use of paracetamol to autism, hyperactivity and behavioral problem in children. Despite the findings, drug regulators in the UK and US maintain that it is safe for pregnant women to use paracetamol (acetaminophen).

“Paracetamol is the first choice of painkiller if you're pregnant or breastfeeding. It's been taken by many pregnant and breastfeeding women with no harmful effects in the mother or baby,” the UK’s National Health Service (NHS) says on its website.

The Food and Drug Administration also does not caution pregnant women about using acetaminophen. The agency said in 2015 that the evidence was “too limited” to justify such a warning.  

Meanwhile, drug regulators in Australia are so concerned about recent deaths involving paracetamol that they may restrict access to the drug. Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has commissioned a report by an expert panel on the risks of paracetamol misuse.

“While paracetamol has well established safety and toxicity profiles, the wide use is paralleled by a high prevalence of accidental and deliberate paracetamol poisoning in the community, in both adults and children,” the TGA said in a statement earlier this month.

“The TGA is aware of concerns, particularly of families and healthcare professionals of affected consumers of paracetamol, regarding the number of poisonings and deliberate overdoses from paracetamol obtained from general retail outlets, and whether current access restrictions are appropriate.”

Australia currently regulates the quantity and dose of paracetamol sold over-the-counter. The independent commission will consider if stricter buying limits should be imposed. 

Anti-Inflammatory Drugs May Contribute to Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Anti-inflammatory drugs that are widely used to treat short-term acute pain disrupt the body’s natural healing process and increase the chances of developing chronic pain, according to a provocative new study by an international team of researchers.

If true, it means that ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) used by millions of people every day for the temporary relief of acute pain may contribute to long-term pain that is even harder to treat.    

“For many decades it’s been standard medical practice to treat pain with anti-inflammatory drugs. But we found that this short-term fix could lead to longer-term problems,” said co-author Jeffrey Mogil, PhD, Professor of Pain Studies and the Canada Research Chair in the Genetics of Pain at McGill University in Montreal.

In a series of studies, Mogil and his colleagues first analyzed genes and immune cells in the blood of 98 patients with acute lower back pain (LBP), noting which patients became free of pain and which ones developed chronic pain after three months.  

In patients who became pain free, there was an early inflammatory response to acute pain that activated neutrophils -- a type of white blood cell that helps the body fight infection.

In patients with chronic pain, there was no inflammatory immune response. This suggests that neutrophils play an active role in resolving pain and protecting patients from transitioning to chronic pain.

“Neutrophils dominate the early stages of inflammation and set the stage for repair of tissue damage. Inflammation occurs for a reason, and it looks like it’s dangerous to interfere with it,” said Mogil.

The study findings, published in Science Translational Medicine, were replicated in a cohort of patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD), a painful inflammation of the jaw.

Researchers also tested their theory on laboratory animals, giving mice with acute pain the anti-inflammatory steroid dexamethasone or the NSAID diclofenac. While the drugs were initially effective, researchers found that blocking neutrophils in mice ultimately prolonged their pain up to ten times the normal duration. Three other analgesics without anti-inflammatory properties (gabapentin, morphine and lidocaine) produced short-term pain relief without affecting the overall duration of pain in mice.

These findings were also supported by a separate analysis of health records for 500,000 people in the United Kingdom with acute LBP. Those that took NSAIDs were nearly twice as likely to still have pain 2 to 6 years later than those who did not take NSAIDs. Patients who took acetaminophen (paracetamol) or antidepressants – neither of which are anti-inflammatory --  were not at higher risk of transitioning to chronic LBP.

“Our findings suggest it may be time to reconsider the way we treat acute pain. Luckily pain can be killed in other ways that don’t involve interfering with inflammation,” said co-author Massimo Allegri, MD, Head of Pain Service at Policlinico of Monza Hospital in Italy and Ensemble Hospitalier de la Cote in Switzerland.

Researchers say their findings should be followed up with larger clinical trials directly comparing the long-term effects of anti-inflammatory drugs to other pain relievers that don’t disrupt inflammation.

“Together, our results suggest that active immune processes confer adaptation at the acute pain stage, and impairment of such inflammatory responses in subjects with acute LBP (or TMD) increases the risk of developing chronic pain. These adaptive inflammatory responses are intrinsically transcriptionally driven, probably modified by both genetics and environmental factors, and can be inhibited by steroids and NSAIDs,” researchers said.

“Our conclusions may have a substantial impact on medical treatment of the most common presenting complaints to health care professionals. Specifically, our data suggest that the long-term effects of anti-inflammatory drugs should be further investigated in the treatment of acute LBP and likely other pain conditions.”

NSAIDs are widely used to treat everything from fever and headache to low back pain and arthritis. They are in so many different pain relieving products, including over-the-counter cold and flu medications, that many consumers may not be aware how often they use NSAIDs. At high doses, studies have found that NSAIDs increase the risk of a heart attack or stroke.

The current draft revision of the CDC opioid guideline recommends that NSAIDs should be used for low back pain, painful musculoskeletal injuries, dental pain, postoperative pain, kidney stones and acute pain caused by episodic migraine.

Acetaminophen also has its risks. Long-term use has been associated with liver, kidney, heart and blood pressure problems. Acetaminophen overdoses are involved in about 500 deaths and over 50,000 emergency room visits in the U.S. annually.

Are NSAIDs Really Better Than Opioids for Post-Operative Pain?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

There have been a rash of recent studies promoting the use acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) over opioids for post-operative pain.

One such study at a Houston hospital led surgeons to conclude that patients were better off with Tylenol. "This study provides us with a strategy to successfully manage pain after surgery using over-the-counter pain medication,” said Min Kim, MD, head of thoracic surgery at Houston Methodist Hospital.  

But critics point out that most of the studies never examine how patients feel about the effectiveness of their pain treatment — focusing instead on the number of opioid pills and smaller opioid doses being prescribed. Pain relief was a secondary consideration, if it was considered at all.

A rare exception to that is a study recently published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), which found that ibuprofen and other NSAIDs gave better post-operative pain relief than the opioid codeine. In a systematic review of 40 clinical trials involving over 5,000 patients who had outpatient procedures, researchers said patients who took NSAIDs had lower pain scores 6 and 12 hours after surgery than patients taking low doses of codeine.

"In all surgery types, subgroups and outcome time points, NSAIDs were equal or superior to codeine for postoperative pain," wrote lead author Matthew Choi, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery at McMaster University in Ontario. "We found that patients randomized to NSAIDs following outpatient surgical procedures reported better pain scores, better global assessment scores, fewer adverse effects and no difference in bleeding events, compared with those receiving codeine.

“These findings are of general importance to any clinician performing painful medical procedures. The various trials in our meta-analysis evaluated a range of procedures, different NSAID types and various degrees of acetaminophen coadministration.”

But critics say the McMaster study also has flaws. The claim that “all surgery types” and “a range of procedures” were included in the analysis is misleading at best. Most of the studies — 28 of the 40 that were analyzed — involved dental surgery, a fact that is not sufficiently disclosed. The rest of the outpatient procedures were for plastic surgery and orthopedic corrections – which can hardly be compared to more serious surgeries that require more pain relief and days or weeks of recovery, not just 6 to 12 hours.      

Another issue is the use of codeine as a research subject. Stefan Franzen, PhD, a chemistry professor at North Carolina State who has an extensive background in biomedical research, questions whether low doses of codeine should even be compared to NSAIDs.

“I question the premise that codeine is the drug that is or should be used by dentists,” said Franzen, author of “Patient Z,” a book the examines the criminalization of pain care. “I read a few papers not cited by this report and they too do not find a great efficacy for codeine. Part of this may be dose. Most commonly they are using 30-60 mg of codeine, which is 5-10 mg of morphine. Not very much if you have severe pain.

“Codeine may be a poor choice, but it may also be a straw man. Why not use tramadol, for example?”

‘Manipulated Data’

Patient advocate Bill Murphy also has doubts about the selection criteria used in studies touting the benefits of non-opioid pain relievers. He believes some researchers cherry-pick evidence to support a conclusion they’ve already reached.

“Opioid sparing post-op surgery programs are nothing more than an attempt to solve a non-problem and in doing so, patients suffer needlessly. The data produced from such programs are very often manipulated by those who designed the program in an obvious attempt to skew the results in favor of a program they endorsed,” said Murphy, who helped get legislation passed in New Hampshire to ensure that pain patients have access to opioid medication.

Murphy has advocated on behalf of patients at Portsmouth Regional Hospital, which has an “Enhanced Surgical Recovery” program that significantly reduced the use of opioids. Instead of Vicodin, patients get Neurontin or nerve blocks for pain relief.

“I was personally called in to advocate on behalf of several patients who were left to suffer in pain following surgery only to have staff assure them their pain was being well managed,” Murphy explained in an email. “Surgeons and nurses reported they were doing very well with Portsmouth Regional’s new protocol for managing post-op pain when in fact, they were not doing ‘very well’ at all.

“These patients were in horrible pain. Of the three I spoke with, none were ever provided any relief. I was with one patient as she was discharged. She was in tears and moved at a glacial pace due to pain as her son and I helped her into his vehicle outside. It was heartbreaking to watch. Her adult son was furious. I stayed in touch with each patient for several weeks afterwards. Each suffered greatly, one was not making any gains in physical therapy due to her lasting pain.”

In 2019, only 11% of patients were prescribed an opioid while at the Portsmouth hospital, and less than 6% were discharged with an opioid prescription. Murphy says the hospital’s policy inevitably leads to some patients with poorly treated pain.  

“What Portsmouth Regional Hospital’s ‘Enhanced Surgical Recovery’ program was doing is akin to making patients bite down on a piece of wood, grind it out, and then convince them the whole experience was for their own good,” says Murphy.    

How Do Opioids and NSAIDs Compare for Chronic Pain?

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

With the ongoing push to reduce opioid prescribing because of the risk of addiction and overdose, claims that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) like ibuprofen are better have become common.

Dr. Andrew Kolodny, founder of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP), recently claimed that “NSAIDs are as effective and in some cases more effective than opioids, even for excruciating painful conditions.”

But it’s not that simple. There are few research studies that directly compare opioids and NSAIDs, and little progress has been made since I wrote about this issue in 2017.

The best we can do is to look at Cochrane reviews of opioids and NSAIDs for specific types of pain management. The Cochrane organization provides unbiased, systematic reviews that are widely accepted as gold-standard evidence.

Cochrane on Opioids

A 2010 Cochrane review found that that opioids for long-term non-cancer pain may be useful in select patients and that opioid addiction was rare.

“Many patients discontinue long-term opioid therapy (especially oral opioids) due to adverse events or insufficient pain relief; however, weak evidence suggests that patients who are able to continue opioids long-term experience clinically significant pain relief,” the authors concluded. “Many minor adverse events (like nausea and headache) occurred, but serious adverse events, including iatrogenic opioid addiction, were rare.

More recent Cochrane reviews found that opioids provide some benefit for restless leg syndrome and rheumatoid arthritis, but little for osteoarthritis.  For neuropathic pain, the results are mixed.  

“Short-term studies provide only equivocal evidence regarding the efficacy of opioids in reducing the intensity of neuropathic pain. Intermediate-term studies demonstrated significant efficacy of opioids over placebo,” reviewers found. “Analgesic efficacy of opioids in chronic neuropathic pain is subject to considerable uncertainty.  Reported adverse events of opioids were common but not life-threatening.”

For specific opioids, results vary. Cochrane found limited, low-quality evidence for oxycodone for neuropathy. Findings for tramadol were discouraging for neuropathic pain and osteoarthritis.

But extended release tapentadol (Nucynta) provided better pain relief for musculoskeletal pain than oxycodone and placebo, although “the clinical significance of the results is uncertain.”

Cochrane on NSAIDs

The findings for NSAIDs are similarly mixed and the type of pain matters a lot.

For chronic low back pain, Cochrane found that in about half of clinical trials NSAIDs were more effective than placebo for reducing pain and disability, but “the magnitude of the effects is small, and the level of evidence was low.”

For neuropathic pain in adults, a Cochrane review found “no good evidence to tell us whether or not oral NSAIDs are helpful to treat neuropathic pain conditions.”

For kidney stone pain, Cochrane found that “NSAIDs were more effective than other non‐opioid pain killers including antispasmodics for pain reduction.”

For fibromyalgia, the evidence for NSAIDs is weak, with reviewers concluding that “NSAIDs cannot be regarded as useful for treating fibromyalgia.”

And for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents, Cochrane reports that “we have no evidence to support or refute the use of NSAIDs.”

Of course, what works for an individual cannot necessarily be predicted from a Cochrane review. Clinical decision-making involves a risk/benefit assessment, with consideration for each patient’s specific circumstances and close follow-up to monitor outcomes. Safety is paramount as well, in particular for drugs like opioids that have significant risks.

In sum, it is difficult to make a blanket statement about opioids versus NSAIDs for chronic non-cancer pain. Results vary by specific opioids and type of pain. We need better studies to inform clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.

Roger Chriss lives with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research. 

UK Guidelines Recommend Exercise and Antidepressants for Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Doctors in the United Kingdom are being advised not to prescribe any type of painkiller to patients suffering from fibromyalgia, chronic headache, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), chronic musculoskeletal pain and other types of “primary chronic pain” for which there is no known cause.   

Those conditions should be treated with exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), acupuncture and antidepressants, according to new guidelines released by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The NICE guideline is far more strict on the use of analgesics than current treatment guidelines in the U.S. and Canada.

The recommendation against using painkillers goes beyond just opioids, and includes many widely used pain relievers such as paracetamol (acetaminophen), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), gabapentinoids and corticosteroids, as well as benzodiazepines such as Valium and Xanax.

“There is little or no evidence that they make any difference to people’s quality of life, pain or psychological distress, but they can cause harm, including possible addiction,” NICE said in a statement.

The guideline says antidepressants such as duloxetine (Cymbalta) and fluoxetine (Prozac) “can be considered” for adults 18 and over with chronic primary pain, even when there is no diagnosis of depression. NICE said antidepressants may help with quality of life, pain, sleep and psychological distress.

“This guideline is very clear in highlighting that, based on the evidence, for most people it’s unlikely that any drug treatments for chronic primary pain, other than antidepressants, provide an adequate balance between any benefits they might provide and the risks associated with them,” Dr. Paul Chrisp, director of NICE’s Centre for Guidelines, said in a statement.

“People who are taking medicines to treat their chronic primary pain which aren’t recommended in the guideline should ask their doctor to review their prescribing as part of shared decision making. This could involve agreeing a plan to carry on taking their medicines if they provide benefit at a safe dose and few harms, or support for them to reduce and stop the medicine if possible.”

The NICE guideline sticks to more traditional recommendations for treating “chronic secondary pain” for which there is a known underlying cause, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis and endometriosis. Pain management for palliative care is not covered in the guideline.

‘Patently Ridiculous’

Although a draft version of the NICE guideline was released last August, pain sufferers were startled by some of the final recommendations, especially those for acupuncture, CBT and exercise.

“The idea that a run around the block will zap the torment of people in chronic pain is patently ridiculous. It doesn’t do a damned thing for my hip,” said James Moore, a UK disability activist who uses a wheelchair. “Did none of the people who contributed to this not read it through this guidance and spot any of the gaping holes in its logic? How is it that I can see them and they can’t?”

“I fear the consequences for those with unsympathetic GPs who suddenly find themselves without medication that may work for them,” Moore wrote in the Independent. “This guidance urgently needs a rethink. Sadly, there may be torture looming for those in torment before we get one.”

The NICE guideline is at odds with recent studies that found antidepressants are minimally effective as pain relievers and often have adverse side effects. A common complaint of pain patients who take duloxetine, for example, is how quickly they became dependent on the drug and have severe withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking it.

The UK guideline also differs from treatment recommendations made by U.S. health agencies. The FDA and CDC recommend gabapentinoids for fibromyalgia, and acetaminophen and NSAIDs for low back pain and migraine.   

The CDC is currently in the process of updating and possibly expanding its opioid guideline to include recommendations for opioid tapering, short-term acute pain, migraine and other pain conditions. 

Acetaminophen Better Than NSAIDs for Acute Trauma Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Acetaminophen (Tylenol) is superior to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating acute pain in patients recovering from arm and leg trauma, according to new research published in the journal Academic Emergency Medicine. It’s the latest in a string of studies that recommend the use of non-opioid pain relievers for acute pain after discharge from a hospital.

The research is based on a study of 1,500 adults in the North African nation of Tunisia, nearly half of whom had bone fractures. Upon discharge from a hospital emergency department, the patients received either acetaminophen, a high-dose NSAID, or a combination of the two. Acetaminophen is commonly called paracetamol outside the United States.

After seven days, researchers found that nearly two-thirds (61.8%) of patients receiving paracetamol alone were “satisfied” or “very satisfied” with their pain relief. Only 11.4% required another oral pain reliever. The other two groups had similar satisfaction scores, but had lower rates of medication adherence. Side-effects such as vomiting and gastrointestinal pain were also more common in patients who received NSAIDs.  

“This study found that the combination of a high‐dose NSAID with paracetamol does not increase the analgesic effect compared to paracetamol alone. We also found that paracetamol alone is superior to high‐dose NSAID alone for post-traumatic extremity pain,” wrote lead author Mohamed Amine Msolli, MD, an emergency room physician at Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital in Tunisia.

“Taking into account its superior efficacy and tolerability, paracetamol appears to be the most suitable first‐line therapy for managing mild to moderate posttraumatic extremity pain after discharge from the ED.”

Opioid analgesics are not widely available in Tunisia and most other Middle East countries, and were not included in the study. Nevertheless, the study findings are being cited as evidence that paracetamol is superior to both NSAIDs and opioids in treating acute trauma pain.

“The surprising efficacy of paracetamol over an NSAID, as shown by a 6.4% lower need for additional oral analgesics, may impact prescribing practices,” Andrew Chang, MD, a professor of emergency medicine at Albany Medical Center, said in a statement.

“Many ED patients who have a contraindication to NSAIDs but require analgesics upon ED discharge might be prescribed an opioid. Given the ongoing opioid epidemic, this study lends evidence to support the use of acetaminophen alone in such patients."

But the risk of long-term opioid use after an emergency room visit is actually quite low. A large 2017 study by the Mayo Clinic found that only about one percent of emergency room patients given an opioid prescription progressed to long term use.

Acetaminophen also has risks that are not acknowledged in the Tunisia study. Excessive use of acetaminophen can lead to liver, kidney, heart and blood pressure problems. Acetaminophen overdoses are involved in about 500 deaths and over 50,000 emergency room visits in the U.S. annually.

Study Debunks Warning About Taking NSAIDs for COVID-19

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

We’ve learned a lot about COVID-19 over the last few months, including what medications help and don’t help coronavirus patients. While much attention has been focused on the antiviral drugs hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir, other more common medications used to treat pain and inflammation have been found to be useful in treating COVID-19 infections.

In the early stages of the pandemic, some health experts warned that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) – ibuprofen in particular – could weaken the immune system and make coronavirus symptoms worse. The French government even warned of "grave adverse effects" linked to the use of NSAIDs by COVID-19 patients and recommended acetaminophen (paracetamol) as a safer alternative.

“Taking anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, cortisone, ...) could be an aggravating factor of the infection. If you have a fever, take paracetamol,” tweeted Dr. Olivier Véran, France’s Health Minister.

That claim has now been debunked by Danish researchers, who reported in PLOS Medicine that ibuprofen and other NSAIDs do not increase the risk of serious illness from coronavirus infections. The researchers reached their conclusion after analyzing the health data of over 9,300 Danish residents who tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus between February 27 and April 29, 2020.

In Denmark, NSAIDs are sold by prescription, except for low-dose ibuprofen that is sold over-the-counter. Researchers identified 248 coronavirus patients who filled a prescription for NSAIDs within 30 days of their positive COVID-19 tests and found they had the same risk of being hospitalized and dying from the coronavirus as those who did not take NSAIDs.

“Use of NSAIDs was not associated with increased 30-day mortality, a finding that was robust in a range of supplementary analyses. Likewise, use of NSAIDs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, or renal replacement therapy in the adjusted analyses,” researchers reported.

“Considering the available evidence, there is no reason to withdraw well-indicated use of NSAIDs during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, the well-established adverse effects of NSAIDs, particularly their renal, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular effects, should always be considered, and NSAIDs should be used in the lowest possible dose for the shortest possible duration for all patients.”

Concerns about steroid drugs resulting in poor outcomes for coronavirus patients are also misplaced, according to an analysis of studies recently published in JAMA. Researchers found that corticosteroids can actually be lifesaving for coronavirus patients and should be the first-line treatment for critically ill patients.

Two other recent studies found that patients with lupus and other forms of arthritis are not at increased risk of serious illness from COVID-19 due to the medications they take. Arthritis is often treated with steroids, biologics and other immune suppressing medications, which had raised concern that the drugs could make patients more susceptible to coronavirus infections. But researchers found that patients with arthritis in the New York City area had the same risk of hospitalization as the general population during the height of the city’s pandemic.

Confusion Over Ibuprofen as Coronavirus Treatment

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

With the number of coronavirus cases growing to nearly 200,000 worldwide, so is confusion about which over-the-counter pain reliever should be used to treat its symptoms. Some health experts say acetaminophen – known as paracetamol outside the U.S. – is better than ibuprofen, aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

"We recommend paracetamol, not ibuprofen for self-medicating," Christian Lindmeier, a spokesman for the World Health Organization said today.

At issue is whether ibuprofen and other NSAIDs interfere with the body’s immune system and make coronavirus symptoms worse. The debate was kicked off Saturday by a tweet from France’s Health Minister.

“Taking anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, cortisone, ...) could be an aggravating factor of the infection. If you have a fever, take paracetamol,” said Dr. Olivier Véran, a neurologist.

That same day, the French government reported "grave adverse effects" linked to the use of NSAIDs in coronavirus patients and released new guidelines saying “the treatment of a fever or of pain linked to COVID-19 or to any other respiratory viral disease should be paracetamol.”

But the UK’s Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) disputed whether there was enough evidence to make such a recommendation.

“There is not currently enough information on ibuprofen use and COVID-19 to advise people to stop using NSAIDs. There is currently no published scientific evidence that ibuprofen increases the risk of catching COVID-19 or makes the illness worse. In addition, there is also no conclusive evidence that taking ibuprofen is harmful for other respiratory infections,” the RPS said in a statement.

The Medical University of Vienna also chimed in, calling reports that it had found a connection between ibuprofen use and worse coronavirus symptoms "fake news."

But other experts agreed that NSAIDs can weaken the immune system.

“Despite all of their beneficial effects, it has long been known that anti-inflammatories can have a depressive effect on parts of our immune systems,” Dr. Amir Khan of Britain’s National Health Service said in Al Jazeera. “If we take medicines that dampen this immune response, such as ibuprofen, this can lead to us not fighting off the infection as effectively, potentially leading to a longer illness with a higher risk of complications.

“Paracetamol is not an anti-inflammatory medication and can be used to effectively treat fever as well as mild to moderate pain and can, therefore, be used safely to help treat the fever associated with the coronavirus.”

The NHS also updated its recommendations, cautioning that while there is no strong evidence that ibuprofen makes coronavirus worse, “until we have more information, take paracetamol to treat the symptoms of coronavirus.”

‘Don’t Give Her Ibuprofen!’

The New York Post reported that a 4-year old British girl suffering coronavirus symptoms had difficulty breathing and took a turn for the worse after taking ibuprofen. Amelia Collins had a cough, fever and other flu-like symptoms.

“To those of you that have children please read. If your child has symptoms of corona virus, DO NOT give them ibuprofen,” Amelia’s father posted on Facebook. “Within an hour of giving her [ibuprofen] she dropped dramatically. She was panting while trying to breathe, her heart rate was very rapid, she couldn’t keep her eyes open, couldn’t lift her head up, her body was shaking, she started being sick on herself and her temperature had risen.”

Amelia’s parents called for an ambulance. Fortunately, paramedics were able reduce her fever without taking her to a hospital.

“Now she’s back on [acetaminophen] she’s back to just being her poorly self. The paramedics only told us while here that were not to give her ibuprofen!” the father said.

In 2015, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration warned that “everyone may be at risk” and ordered new warning labels for ibuprofen and other NSAIDs to indicate they increase the risk of a fatal heart attack or stroke.

But acetaminophen also has issues. The pain reliever has long been associated with liver injury and allergic reactions such as skin rash. Acetaminophen is the active ingredient in hundreds of over-the-counter pain relievers and cough, cold and flu medicines – and many consumers have no idea how much acetaminophen they’re taking.

Over 50,000 emergency room visits each year in the U.S. are blamed on acetaminophen overdoses, including 25,000 hospitalizations and hundreds of deaths.

Health Risks of NSAIDs Led to ‘Significant Under-Treatment of Pain’

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The opioid crisis has been blamed on a lot of things, everything from pharmaceutical marketing to poor medical education to an epidemic of despair.

Now we can also blame NSAIDs.

A new study by researchers at Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) found that a decline in prescriptions for non-opioid analgesics — mostly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and COX-2 inhibitors -- coincided with a marked increase in opioid prescribing for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Concerns about the cardiovascular side effects of Vioxx and other COX-2 inhibitors first came to light in the early 2000s. More was also being learned about heart disease, strokes and gastrointestinal problems associated with NSAIDs.

"While the opioid epidemic is complex and has many possible causes, our findings suggest that health risks associated with NSAIDs were one factor that led to increased prescribing of opioids," says lead author Dr. Andrew Stokes, assistant professor of global health at BUSPH.

Stokes and his colleagues looked at 1999-2016 prescription data for over 7,200 U.S. adults with back pain, neck pain or arthritis. Increases in opioid prescriptions matched the decrease in prescribing for non-opioid analgesics (predominantly NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors) between 2003 and 2006.

"We realized that the point at which increasing opioid prescriptions crossed over with the decrease in non-opioid prescriptions occurred when the cardiovascular risks of COX-2 inhibitors led to rofecoxib (Vioxx) coming off the market. The gastrointestinal risks of NSAIDs were also well-recognized by then,” says senior author Dr. Tuhina Neogi, a professor of epidemiology at BUSPH and Chief of Rheumatology at Boston Medical Center.

“Thus it appeared to us that an increase in opioid prescribing during that time was, at least in part, an unintended consequence of COX-2 inhibitors coming off the market and concerns about NSAID risk.”

‘Unmet Need for Pain Management’

The study, published in JAMA Network Open, also found that growing recognition of the opioid crisis after 2013 led to decreases in opioid and non-opioid analgesic prescriptions for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain, particularly among those with less education and lower socioeconomic status.

"Care is needed to ensure that our response to the opioid crisis does not leave people living with chronic pain behind. The abrupt decline in prescribing to those of low socioeconomic status is concerning given that these same individuals also face the greatest barriers to accessing alternative pain treatments, such as physical therapy," Stokes says.

"There's so much talk now about transitioning people away from opioids. But if that's happening without considering the barriers to non-pharmacologic treatments, there may be a significant problem of under-treatment of pain," adds study co-author Dielle Lundberg, a research fellow at BUSPH.

Between 2013 and 2106, researchers found an 11% decrease in prescriptions for both opioid and non-opioid pain relievers, suggesting a significant amount of pain was going untreated.

“Care is needed to ensure that our response to the opioid crisis does not leave people living with chronic pain behind.”

— Dr. Andrew Stokes

“The fact that the present study was restricted to patients with potential needs for pain management also raises the concerning possibility that an unmet need for pain management has increased over this period. Such a trend would be alarming given evidence that untreated chronic pain may prompt patients with chronic pain to seek out illicit heroin or fentanyl,” researchers concluded.

“In addition, several recent studies based on data from the National Violent Death Reporting System have found a high rate of chronic pain among suicide decedents, and recent research and commentary on opioid discontinuation have suggested that recent increases in the suicide death rate may be linked to changes in pain treatment.”

Use of NSAIDs Risky for Osteoarthritis Patients

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

It’s long been known that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen and naproxen can raise the risk of cardiovascular problems. A large new study in Canada has documented how NSAIDs can significantly raise the risk of heart disease, congestive heart failure and stroke in people with osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disorder that leads to thinning of cartilage and progressive joint damage. NSAIDs are frequently used to treat the pain and inflammation caused by OA.

The Canadian study, published in the journal Arthritis & Rheumatology, looked at nearly 7,750 osteoarthritis patients in British Columbia and compared them with a control group of over 23,000 patients without OA. The average age of the participants was 65 and a little over half were women.

The risk of developing cardiovascular disease was found to be about 23% higher among people with OA than the control group. Researchers attributed about 41% of that increased risk to the use of NSAIDs.

NSAIDs appeared to play a significant role in several cardiovascular problems. The risk of congestive heart failure was 42% higher among people with OA, followed by a 17% greater risk of heart disease and a 14% greater risk of stroke.

"To the best of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study to evaluate the mediating role of NSAID use in the relationship between osteoarthritis and cardiovascular disease in a large population-based sample," said senior author Aslam Anis, PhD, of the School of Population and Public Health at the University of British Columbia.

"Our results indicate that osteoarthritis is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and suggest a substantial proportion of the increased risk is due to the use of NSAIDs. This is highly relevant because NSAIDs are some of the most commonly used drugs to manage pain in patients with osteoarthritis."

The association of cardiovascular disease with NSAIDs is consistent with previous research.  A large international study in 2017, for example, found that prescription strength NSAIDs raises the risk of a heart attack as soon as the first week of use.

NSAIDs are used to alleviate pain and reduce inflammation, and are found in a wide variety of over-the-counter products, including cold and flu remedies. They are found in so many products -- such as Advil and Motrin -- that many consumers may not be aware how often they use NSAIDs. 

Canada adopted guidelines in 2017 that recommend NSAIDs as an alternative to opioid pain medication. The guideline makes no mention of the health risks associated with NSAIDs, but focuses on their cost effectiveness.

“NSAID-based treatment may have lower mean costs and higher effectiveness relative to opioids,” the guideline states. “Naproxen-based regimens in particular may be more cost effective compared to opioids and other NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and celecoxib.”

Opioid guidelines released in 2016 by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also recommend NSAIDs as an alternative to opioids, but acknowledge the medications “do have risks, including gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation as well as renal and cardiovascular risks.”

In 2015, the Food and Drug Administration ordered warning labels for all NSAIDs to indicate they increase the risk of a fatal heart attack or stroke. The FDA warning does not apply to aspirin.

The European Society of Cardiology recommends limited use of NSAIDs by patients who are at risk of heart failure. People already diagnosed with heart failure should refrain from using NSAIDs altogether.

Patients at Ohio Hospital Have Surgery Without Opioids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Would you want to go through a major surgery without the use of opioid pain medication?

Patients at an Ohio hospital are getting acetaminophen, gabapentin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to manage their pain before and after colorectal operations – and their surgeons say the treatment results in better patient outcomes.

“Over 75 percent of our elective colorectal patients underwent surgery without requiring narcotic analgesics postoperatively, including after discharge,” says Sophia Horattas, MD, of Cleveland Clinic Akron General Hospital.  “During this time period our patient satisfaction scores improved as well as patients' perceptions of pain control.”

All eight general surgeons at Akron General adopted the non-opioid treatment protocol in 2016, applying it to patients who had elective colon operations. Prior to surgery, the patients were all educated about pain management, non-opioid analgesics, and the risks associated with opioids.

Researchers evaluated 155 of the patients and presented their findings this week at the American College of Surgeons Clinical Congress in Boston.

Overall, 83 percent (128) of the patients did not need opioid medication after their operations. Among those who did, use of opioids before surgery was often an indicator that they would want them again. Nine of the 15 patients who had prior experience with opioids used them again after surgery.

Among the remaining 140 patients who did not use opioids before surgery, 85 percent (119) did not need opioid medication for pain relief.

The researchers found that patients who used opioid painkillers typically spent more time in the hospital; an average of 2.7 days vs. 2.3 days for the non-narcotic group.

“Patient education played a large role in protocol compliance, and patient satisfaction improved as they were able to avoid prolonged fasting, achieve improved pain control without the side effects of narcotic analgesia, and be discharged home earlier,” said Horrattas.

For pre-emptive analgesia before surgery, patients received one dose of acetaminophen, gabapentin, and the NSAID celecoxib (Celebrex).  In the operating room, patients received a nerve block and underwent anesthesia with the non-opioid pain relievers ketamine and lidocaine.   

Surgeons at Akron General have since adopted the non-opioid protocol for other major abdominal operations, such as bariatric procedures, gynecological and genital/urinary tract procedures, and liver and gall bladder operations.

“One of the great things about our protocol is its reproducibility.  Once we developed our program, we found that it could be standardized across departments with consistently reproducible results,” said Horattas.

Akron General’s protocol is similar to guidelines adopted by the American Pain Society (APS) for postoperative pain care. The APS also encourages the use of non-opioid medications such as acetaminophen, NSAIDs, gabapentin (Neurotin) and pregabalin (Lyrica).  

Akron General gets below average ratings for patient satisifaction from Hospital Compare, a Medicare survey that asks patients about their experiences during a recent hospital stay. The hospital received only two of a possible five stars, which places it in the bottom third of hospitals nationwide. Only 68% of Akron General’s patients said they would definitely recommend the hospital.

According to Healthgrades, 3 percent of the patients died after a colorectal surgery at Akron General, which is slightly below the national average for that procedure.

Opioid Addiction Rare After Surgery

In recent years, many hospitals have shifted away from routinely giving patients opioids during and after major surgeries -- even though it is rare for patients to become chronic opioid users.

A large Canadian study found that only 0.4% of elderly patients that were prescribed opioids while recovering from a heart, lung, colon, prostate or hysterectomy operation were still using them a year after their surgeries.

Another large study published this year in the British Medical Journal found similar results. Only 0.2% of patients who were prescribed opioids for post-surgical pain were later diagnosed with opioid dependence, abuse or a non-fatal overdose.

Long-term opioid use after dental surgeries is also rare. A recent study published in JAMA found that only 1.3% of teens and young adults who were given opioids after wisdom teeth removal were still being prescribed opioids months after their initial prescription.

The vast majority of patients still prefer opioids and perceive them as the most effective form of pain relief after surgery. In a recent survey of over 500 adults who were scheduled to have surgery, researchers at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia found that 77% expected opioids, 37% expected acetaminophen, and 18% expected a NSAID for pain relief.

"Patients often assume they will receive opioids for pain, believing they are superior, and therefore may pressure physicians to prescribe them after surgery," said lead author Nirmal Shah, DO, an anesthesia resident at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital.

"But research shows opioids often aren't necessarily more effective. Clearly, we need to provide more education to bridge that gap and help patients understand that there are many options for pain relief after surgery, including other pain medications such as acetaminophen and ibuprofen."