Topical Gel Shows Promise as Treatment for Neuropathic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

An experimental gel developed to prevent skin damage caused by aging and ultraviolet light is showing promise as a treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, according to research underway in Australia.

The topical gel – known as RM191A – contains a copper-based compound that is absorbed by the skin and prevents the buildup of free radicals that cause skin damage associated with aging and skin cancer.

In a study recently published in the journal Redox Biology, RM191A was found to have potent antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and wound-healing properties in laboratory mice.

The gel is currently being evaluated in 24 patients at a Sydney hospital as a treatment for chronic nerve pain caused by surgery, chemotherapy, trauma and diabetes.  Results are expected later this month.

“Early sample uses of this topical formulation indicated it could be a significant in the management of certain types of chronic nerve pain,” says Llewellyn Casbolt, chief scientist and co-founder of Sydney-based RR MedSciences, which is developing the gel.

“In many ways, scientists see our discovery as a new class of anti-inflammatory that acts by the modulation of free radicals as well as reducing several inflammatory cytokines, providing a drug that can be therapeutically useful where the reduction of inflammation, as well as cellular and tissue healing - indeed pain relief - is also advantageous for a patient.”

The company plans to release an over-the-counter version of its gel in the next 12-18 months as a treatment for skin damage. It will take longer to get regulatory approval for the gel as a treatment for nerve pain and may require a prescription.

RR MedSciences (RRMS) plans to conduct further trials and is seeking additional partners and funding to accelerate the gel’s development.

“The management of pain, often related to conditions of inflammation or trauma that results in nerve or chronic pain is an area of great need.  Advancing the ability for people to modulate their pain, in a safe and effective manner that improves quality of life, is a core objective,” said Helena Libershal Casbolt, CEO and co-founder of RRMS.

A subsidiary of RRMS is currently selling a copper-based body cream called Blue Healer Care as a treatment for damaged skin and for relief from skin irritation and muscle soreness.

Survey Finds Over Half of MS Patients Abused by Caregivers

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

People with multiple sclerosis already have enough problems living with a progressive disease and sky-high medical bills. But now there’s word that many of them are being abused by their own caregivers.   

Researchers at the University of California, Riverside surveyed 206 patients with advanced MS and found that over half of them were being abused in some way by an unpaid caregiver who was often a member of their own family. The mistreatment ranged from psychological (44%) and financial abuse (25%) to neglect (16.5%) and physical abuse (11%). Over 8 percent of patients said they were abused sexually.   

"We knew we would find some level of abuse and neglect, but we were surprised by how prevalent it is," said Elizabeth Morrison-Banks, MD, a health sciences clinical professor at the UC Riverside School of Medicine, who led the study. "The findings of this study represent a collective cry for help from so many families affected by multiple sclerosis across the United States."

MS is a chronic and disabling autoimmune disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing pain, numbness, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision and fatigue.

"Some people live with MS for many years but with milder symptoms, and they may remain completely self-sufficient and never require a caregiver,” Morrison-Banks explained. “Others are less fortunate and develop neurological disability that can make them vulnerable to abuse and neglect if they are unable to move around independently, take care of their own finances, or get away from the situation when family conflict escalates. These problems are compounded if the person with MS and family lack financial resources."

A recent study found over 75% of American adults with MS face financial hardship that has forced them to cut spending on food, clothing and housing. Many have gone into debt or filed for bankruptcy, and over a third have delayed or stopped filling prescriptions because they can’t afford them. The average cost of disease-modifying MS drugs is about $76,000 a year.

For MS patients who are struggling financially, hiring a professional caregiver is not an option, so many have to rely on family caregivers.

"Some family caregivers are also working full time, caring for children or other family members, and sometimes dealing with health issues of their own," explained Morrison-Banks. "I want to emphasize that the majority of family caregivers do not mistreat those they care for, even in situations that can be very challenging. Nonetheless, it is important to recognize the risk factors for mistreatment of people with disabilities, and do what we can to identify, mitigate, and prevent abuse and neglect."

Other risk factors for mistreatment include MS patients with higher levels of cognitive impairment, caregivers having a mental health problem, alcohol use by the caregiver or patient, and low levels of social support within the family.

"Being a full-time family caregiver for someone with substantial neurological disability often presents significant challenges," Morrison-Banks said. "Many families take these challenges in stride, but others end up in situations of abuse and/or neglect."

The survey findings have been published in the journal Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. The research paper is believed to be the first to document the nature and extent of caregiver mistreatment of MS patients in the United States.

The survey did not include patients who had paid caregivers or trained clinicians. A study of paid caregivers is an important next step for the research team. The National Multiple Sclerosis Society funded the UC Riverside study.

Study Finds Most Drugs Ineffective for Neuropathic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A first of its kind study that compared four medications widely used to treat neuropathy found that all four were usually ineffective in treating pain and many patients stopped taking them due to side effects.    

Over 20 million people in the U.S. suffer from neuropathic pain, a tingling, burning or stinging sensation in the hands and feet caused by nerve damage. Neuropathy is often caused by diabetes, chemotherapy or trauma, but in about 25% of cases the cause is unknown and classified as cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN).

There is little guidance for physicians and patients on what drugs to take for CSPN, so researchers at the University of Missouri School of Medicine conducted a “real world” study in which 402 patients with CSPN took one of the four neuropathy medications.

The four drugs studied were nortriptyline (Aventyl), a tricyclic antidepressant; duloxetine (Cymbalta), a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant; pregabalin (Lyrica), an anti-seizure drug; and mexiletine (Mexitil), an anti-arrhythmic medication used to treat irregular heartbeats.

Nortriptyline, duloxetine and pregabalin are approved by the FDA for treating neuropathy, while mexiletine is used off-label. None of the drugs were originally developed to treat neuropathic pain.

"As the first study of its kind, we compared these four drugs in a real-life setting to provide physicians with a body of evidence to support the effective management of peripheral neuropathy and to support the need for newer and more effective drugs for neuropathic pain," said lead researcher Richard Barohn, MD, executive vice chancellor for health affairs at the University of Missouri.

After 12 weeks of use, any drug that reduced pain for a patient by at least a 50% was considered effective, a recognized industry standard to define therapy success.. Researchers also kept track of patients who stopped taking a drug and dropped out of the study due to adverse effects.

The study findings, published in JAMA Neurology, can best be described as underwhelming. Patients were far more likely to stop taking a drug than they were to stay on a medication that was helping them.    

Of the four drugs, only nortriptyline was an effective pain reliever for at least 25% of patients. It also had the second-lowest drop-out rate (38%), giving it the highest level of overall utility. Duloxetine had the second-highest efficacy rate (23%) and the lowest drop-out rate (37%).

Pregbalin had the lowest efficacy rate (15%) and the second highest drop-out rate (42%), while mexiletine had the highest drop-out rate (58%) and an efficacy rate of 20 percent.

EFFICACY RATE OF NEUROPATHY DRUGS

SOURCE: JAMA NEUROLOGY

"There was no clearly superior performing drug in the study," Barohn said. "However, of the four medications, nortriptyline and duloxetine performed better when efficacy and dropouts were both considered. Therefore, we recommend that either nortriptyline or duloxetine be considered before the other medications we tested."

While nortriptyline had the highest efficacy rate, it also had the highest rate of adverse events, with over half of patients (56%) reporting side effects such as dry mouth, drowsiness, fatigue and bloating.  

Previous studies have found that duloxetine and pregabalin had higher efficacy rates for neuropathic pain, but Barohn and his colleagues say their research more accurately reflects what patients experience in real life and what physicians encounter in their practice.

“Our findings could affect how these 4 drugs are used by all physicians who treat patients with neuropathy. Findings support duloxetine and nortriptyline as better-performing drug choices in this population with neuropathic pain, suggesting that they should be prescribed before pregabalin or mexiletine are considered. However, this study also supports a finding that all 4 drugs helped improve pain in at least some patients, so each could be tried if others failed,” they concluded.     

There are several other drugs used to treat neuropathy, including gabapentin, venlafaxine and sodium channel inhibitors. Barohn says additional comparative studies should be performed on those drugs. His goal is to build effectiveness data on nearly a dozen drugs for CSPN.

Over 75% of MS Patients Face Financial Hardship

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Over 75% of American adults with multiple sclerosis face financial toxicity or hardship that has forced them to cut spending on food, clothing and housing. Many have gone into debt or filed for bankruptcy, and over a third have delayed or stopped filling prescriptions because they can’t afford them.

The findings come from a survey of 243 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients conducted by the Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute. The study is the first of its kind to evaluate how financial hardship is forcing MS patients to forego treatment and make drastic changes in their lifestyles and spending.

In recent years, the cost of prescriptions for many disease-modifying MS drugs has nearly tripled to about $76,000 a year. While insurance pays for most of it, many patients are overwhelmed by deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. The lifetime cost of treating MS in the United States is estimated at over $4 million per patient.

“Over the last 20 years, higher out-of-pocket costs for advanced imaging tests and increased cost sharing have caused the financial burdens on MS patients to escalate. Among medically bankrupt families, MS is associated with the highest total out of-pocket expenditures exceeding those of cancer patients,” said lead author Gelareh Sadigh, MD, an assistant radiology professor at Emory University School of Medicine.

“Our study results demonstrate the high prevalence of financial toxicity for MS patients and the resulting decisions patients make that impact their health care and lifestyle.”

More Debt, Less Spending

The findings, published in the Multiple Sclerosis Journal, show that over half of MS patients (56%) reported decreases in their income due to disability, unemployment or retirement. To make ends meet, many cut spending on food and clothing (35%) and leisure activities (50%) or withdrew money from their savings (40%) and retirement accounts (15%). Others went into debt by borrowing money (19%) or charging their credit cards (30%).

Over a third of MS patients decided to forego some type of medical care or treatment, such as not filling a prescription (16%), skipping doses (13.5%) or stopped taking medication (13%).

“These data underscore the need for shared decision-making and an awareness of patient financial strain when planning treatment strategies,” said co-author and Neiman Institute researcher Richard Duszak, MD, a professor and vice chair for health policy at Emory University. “In addition to the impact on adherence, financial toxicity was associated with significantly lower physical health-related quality of life, demonstrating the broad consequences of treatment costs for many MS patients.”

MS is a chronic and progressive disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing pain, numbness, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision and fatigue. Disease modifying therapy (DMT) reduces the frequency and severity of MS flare-ups, but many patients can’t afford the drugs.

A 2019 survey by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society found that 40% of MS patients who take a DMT drug altered or stopped taking their medication due to the high cost. According to Healthcare Bluebook, a 30-day supply of a brand name DMT like Gilenya costs about $8,845, or over $106,000 a year.

Criticism of the high cost of MS drugs is growing. Last year when the FDA approved a new MS medication called Vumerity, drug maker Biogen set its wholesale price at $88,000 a year. That brought a rebuke from the National MS Society, which released a statement that accused Biogen of price gouging.

UK Guideline Warns Against Using Opioids and Most Other Drugs for Chronic Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The United Kingdom may be on the verge of adopting even more stringent opioid guidelines than the United States and Canada.  

The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has released a sweeping guideline drafted by an expert committee that recommends opioid medication not be prescribed for chronic primary pain at any dose due to lack of evidence and risk of addiction.

“Based on their experience, the committee agreed that even short-term use of opioids could be harmful for a chronic condition. The lack of evidence for effectiveness of opioids, along with evidence of long-term harm, persuaded the committee to recommend against opioid use for people with chronic primary pain,” the guideline states.

The NICE guideline doesn’t stop there. It recommends against the use of virtually every other medication commonly used to treat chronic pain, including gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines, acetaminophen (paracetamol), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), ketamine, corticosteroids, and antipsychotics. According to NICE, these non-opioid pain relievers may be addictive, have risky side effects and do more harm than good.

“The committee agreed that not commenting on these medicines could result in their continued use in practice, which would be inappropriate given the lack of evidence and possible harms, so they recommended against the use of these treatments,” the guideline says.

The guideline is the first by NICE to address “chronic primary pain” — a vague term used to describe pain conditions that last longer than 3 months, and cause significant emotional distress and disability, such as fibromyalgia, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, chronic musculoskeletal pain and symptoms that “can’t be accounted for by another diagnosis.”

NICE said the new guideline “should be used alongside” existing recommendations it has already issued for headache, low back pain and sciatica, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis, endometriosis and irritable bowel syndrome.

The draft guideline recommends that people with chronic primary pain get physical therapy, acupuncture, psychological therapy and regular exercise. Several other alternative therapies, including transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and manual therapies such as chiropractic care, are not recommended due to lack of evidence.

Surprisingly, the only class of medication that was recommended for chronic primary pain is anti-depressants such as duloxetine (Cymbalta) and fluoxetine (Prozac), even though their use would be off-label.

Most Treatments Don’t Work

In short, the NICE guideline states that few treatments work for chronic primary pain and most should be avoided.

“There is no medical intervention, pharmacological or non-pharmacological, that is helpful for more than a minority of people with chronic pain, and benefits of treatments are modest in terms of effect size and duration. Additional morbidity resulting from treatment for chronic pain is not unusual, so it is important to evaluate the treatments we offer for chronic pain, to focus resources appropriately and to minimise harm,” the guideline warns.

The draft guidance is open for public comment until September 14.

The head of a large association of UK primary care physicians said the NICE recommendations are welcome, as long as the alternative therapies are made widely available.

“Most patients in pain do not want to take medication long-term, and GPs do not want this either, but sometimes medication has been the only thing that brings relief. As such these new guidelines, which focus on alternative therapies, have the potential to be beneficial for patients - but they will need to be guaranteed appropriate access to them,” Professor Martin Marshall, Chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners said in a statement.

“We should also be mindful not to disregard some medications completely as a lack of evidence may be due to a lack of high-quality research, particularly for older drugs, such as paracetamol.”

NICE estimates that chronic pain may affect between one-third and one-half of the UK population. Almost half of people with chronic pain have a diagnosis of depression and two-thirds are unable to work because of it.

The guideline emphasizes that physicians communicate and work collaboratively with patients to understand the symptoms and causes of their pain.  

“Understandably, people with chronic pain expect a clear diagnosis and effective treatment. But its complexity and the fact GPs and specialists alike find chronic pain very challenging to manage, means this is often not possible. This mismatch between patient expectations and treatment outcomes can affect the relationship between healthcare professionals and patients, a possible consequence of which is the prescribing of ineffective but harmful drugs,” Nick Kosky, a psychiatrist and chair of the NICE guideline committee said in a statement.

“This guideline, by fostering a clearer understanding of the evidence for the effectiveness of chronic pain treatments, will help to improve the confidence of healthcare professionals in their conversations with patients. In doing so it will help them better manage both their own and their patient’s expectations.” 

The Wisdom of CRPS: Making My Final Cancer Treatment Decision

By Cynthia Toussaint, PNN Columnist

A year ago when I got my triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis, the second dreadful thought that ran through my head – perhaps worse than the Big C – was that for any chance at survival I had to once again enter the horrific world of western medicine, a system that for decades had brought me only misery when it came to Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

After five months of researching and contemplating what might be my most hopeful and least harmful treatment strategy, I began chemotherapy with a healthy level of trepidation. While chemo torture can only be described as indescribable, I was stunned and pleased to do well out of the gates. In fact, my tumor disappeared during week one.

In all, I miraculously completed 17 chemo infusions while escaping lethal complications, only because my integrative doctor, Dr. Malcolm Taw, kept a check on my oncologist’s over-treatment. Let it be known that when some people die from “complications of cancer,” they’re really dying from doctors taking that lethal risk due to money and/or hubris. A personal example is the week my infusion nurse refused to administer chemo because my blood count was so low she was afraid I’d get an infection and die.

My oncologist’s goal for me was 18 infusions, a ridiculously high number that I began questioning when I hit twelve. My hair was already growing back, while my body was rabidly flushing the drugs out of my system (don’t ask).

I couldn’t find anyone, in person or on the internet, who’d done more than 12 infusions. Scarier, an oncologist who filled in one morning shared with me that at no time in his career had he seen someone order so many.

My guess is that because my oncologist and the massive health system she works for are aggressively working to prove this chemo regimen is a keeper, 18 would seal the deal for their final report.   

CYNTHIA TOUSSAINT

I reluctantly marched on with this needless torture for one reason. My oncologist fed me a steady diet of fear, western medicine at its best.

To keep me in line, I dealt with verbal assaults like, “Your cancer’s going to grow right back if you take a week off.” Another was the golden oldie, “I don’t like your questions!” And after the last infusion went south, I was speared with, “All of my other patients want to live.”

The reason I didn’t graduate at the top of my chemo class of one was that, while driving home from number 17, my hands and feet felt like they were bursting into flames while fireworks popped. When John got me upstairs to our condo, he took a picture of the beet-red appendages, my expression frighteningly pale.

After being hideously ill for four days, which is typical as side-effects are cumulative, one afternoon I played the piano for a few minutes and out of nowhere my CRPS, mixed with chemo and my new friend, neuropathy, appeared without mercy in my wrists and hands. As of this writing, five weeks later, I’ve had little let up. While my idiot oncologist never took my CRPS seriously, I’m suffering at a level 9-10 pain and laboring to navigate a world built for people with hands.

So much for number 18, which broke my heart. I’m a goal-oriented gal, and desperately wanted closure for trauma release. At infusion centers, people get to know each other, who lives and who doesn’t, and it’s a big deal when a patient completes their chemo course. The nurses do a hip-hip-hurrah, ring a bell and everyone gets to say goodbye and good luck. I gave it my crazy-strong best, but as usual, CRPS made my decision.

And it would make my next.

Despite not getting the last infusion in, I hit a home run. No, a grand slam. Confirmed with follow-up imaging, I’d achieved a clinical “Complete Response” – the best I could do and hope for. Turns out I’m what they call a “super responder.”

Standard of care dictates that with triple-negative cancer, complete response or not, surgery is mandated (lumpectomy and lymph node removal) to confirm all microscopic malignancies are gone.

This knowing had been looming like a dark cloud since my diagnosis. CRPS and surgery don’t make good bedfellows, as the cutting and tissue extracting tends to fire up nerves that can spark a full-blown CRPS flare. My past has taught me my flares can last a month. Or a lifetime.  

Still deeply influenced by my doctor’s fear-mongering, I kept coming back to surgery despite its risks and my gut telling me to go another way. For once in my life, I wished I’d been well enough to do all the goddamn treatments without having to work around my never-ending pain. Bottom line, I wanted my best shot at living.

But live how? After surgery, would I be left with a life worth living?

The pulsating, burning pain in my hands and wrists provided this answer too. My body told me, unequivocally, that surgery would leave me with the mother-of-all pulsating burning pain. Body-wide and never ending. 

Traumatized that I couldn’t make this big decision, my life-partner, John, reminded me that CRPS has made all of my decisions for me. It didn’t allow me to have a child. I still can’t marry John after 40 years. And it eviscerated my career, one I still yearn for every day. I’m angry that my disease boxes me into corners and knee-caps me at every turn.

Even so, I left fear behind and went toward the light. John and I found three studies, including a meta-analysis, that support de-escalating treatment for triple-negative complete responders. While still early and controversial, these studies show that women who choose active surveillance in lieu of surgery post-chemo live just as long and well -- dare I say even better -- than those who go under the knife.

My integrative doctor, and even my surgeon, are strongly backing my decision – as does my pain doctor who wryly commented, “I don’t see any reason to poke the bear.” 

I’m damn certain that the decision I’ve made to forego surgery will be the standard of care in 15 to 20 years – and that I’m the future. I know deep inside that my CRPS, for all of its hell and fury, is pointing me into a smarter, wiser decision than the one fear would have driven me to. 

This “super responder” is in remission, and moving on…              

Cynthia Toussaint is the founder and spokesperson at For Grace, a non-profit dedicated to bettering the lives of women in pain. She has lived with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and 15 co-morbidities for nearly four decades. Cynthia is the author of “Battle for Grace: A Memoir of Pain, Redemption and Impossible Love.” 

Top of Form

FDA Approves Capsaicin Patch as Treatment for Diabetic Neuropathy

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Millions of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy live with burning or stinging pain in their hands and feet. In what could be called a case of fighting fire with fire, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the first use of a medicated patch made with capsaicin – the spicy substance that makes chili peppers hot – as a treatment for diabetic neuropathy.

The Qutenza skin patch is made by Grünenthal and contains 8% capsaicin, which acts on pain receptors in the skin by desensitizing and numbing nerve endings.

“Pain associated with diabetic neuropathy is an extremely challenging condition to diagnose, treat and manage effectively, which has a significant quality of life impact for many patients,” said David Simpson, MD, a Professor of Neurology at the Icahn School of Medicine. “In addition, patients are dissatisfied with unresolved pain and the side effects associated with current systemic treatments.”

A 2015 study found that Qutenza worked faster than pregabalin (Lyrica) in treating neuropathic pain, providing relief in 7.5 days, compared to an average of 36 days in patients taking pregabalin. Patients who used Qutenza were also more satisfied with their treatment and had fewer side effects.

That same year the European Commission approved Qutenza as a treatment for diabetic neuropathy, but it took another five years for the FDA to give its approval for the same condition. The patch was initially approved by the FDA in 2009 for treating post-herpetic neuralgia, a complication from shingles.

“Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy has a significant impact on the day-to-day lives of millions of individuals, and we believe Qutenza can be a much-needed non-opioid treatment option for these patients,” Jan Adams, Grünenthal’s Chief Scientific Officer, said in a statement. “This expanded indication of Qutenza in the U.S. is an exciting milestone in our efforts to make Qutenza available to even more patients in need worldwide.”  

A big catch is that the patch shouldn’t be applied at home and should only be used sparingly. According to its warning label, Qutenza should be applied by a doctor or healthcare professional, who should be wearing a face mask and gloves to protect themselves in a well-ventilated area. Up to four patches can be applied on the feet for up to 30 minutes, a procedure that can be repeated every three months. The most common side effects are redness, itching and irritation of the skin where the patch is applied.

Qutenza has gotten mixed reviews from patients, who warned that capsaicin can cause painful burning sensations.

“Qutenza really does work. I did have very intense burning,” a patient posted in a review on Drugs.com. “The pain can be mind blowing but it does subside and a cool fan helps. Don't let your pets near the area as it will burn them. I have had multiple Qutenza and… it lasts up to 3 months plus. Don't apply yourselves. Use a health professional as it does burn.”

“Although I was informed about this treatment and how your body might react to it, my case spiraled out of hands,” another patient wrote. “The medics had to call a team to manage my situation. The pain was so much that without a shred of doubt words simply can not explain.”

Diabetic neuropathy is a progressive and debilitating complication of diabetes that affects more than 5 million Americans. Patients typically experience numbness, tingling or stabbing sensations in their hands and feet. More severe cases can result in foot ulcers, amputations and other complications.

Study Finds Microdosing THC Reduces Pain Levels

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Very low doses of inhaled THC – the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis – can significantly reduce pain levels in chronic pain patients, according to a small study conducted in Israel.

The concept of “microdosing” cannabis isn’t new, but this was the first clinical study to demonstrate its effectiveness in temporarily relieving pain. The study was sponsored by Syqe Medical, an Israeli medical technology company that makes an inhaler designed to deliver microdoses of cannabis and other drugs.

The study involved 27 patients living with neuropathy, radiculopathy, phantom limb pain or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), who self-reported pain levels of at least 6 on a zero to 10 pain scale. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups that inhaled either a placebo or two different microdoses of THC.  

The most effective dose to relieve pain was just 500 micrograms of THC, inhaled 3-4 times per day. Participants reported a 2 to 3 point reduction in their pain levels for 150 minutes.  

A typical cannabis patient might consume 150,000 micrograms of THC per day – about 75 times more than the highest dose used in the study. Researchers say their findings, published in the European Journal of Pain, suggest that pain patients can benefit from dramatically lower doses.

"We can conclude from the study results that low doses of cannabis may provide desirable effects while avoiding cognitive debilitations, significantly contributing to daily functioning, quality of life, and safety of the patient,” said lead researcher Elon Eisenberg, PhD, Director of the Multidisciplinary Pain Relief Unit at Rambam Health Care Campus in northern Israel.

“The doses given in this study, being so low, mandate very high precision in the treatment modality. This precision is unique to the Syqe drug delivery technology, enabling cannabis dosing at pharmaceutical standards."

There were side effects from inhaling microdoses of THC. About 20% of patients reported feeling “high” or experienced dizziness, sleepiness, nausea, cough or dry mouth. But researchers said there was “no evidence of consistent impairment” in any of the participants.

The risk of impairment from THC is one reason researchers and cannabis companies have largely focused on the medical benefits of cannabidiol (CBD), a compound also found in marijuana. CBD is not psychoactive, while THC can make people impaired – at least in high doses.

"This study is the first to show that human sensitivity to THC is significantly greater than previously assumed, indicating that if we can treat patients with much higher precision, lower quantities of drug will be needed, resulting in fewer side effects and an overall more effective treatment,” said Perry Davidson, CEO of Syqe Medical.

“The Syqe drug delivery technology is also applicable to opioids and other compounds that, while potentially effective, are notoriously associated with dangerous side effects. The introduction of a tool to prescribe medications at such low doses with such high resolution may allow us to achieve treatment outcomes that previously were not possible."

In addition to cannabis, the company is also exploring the use of its inhaler to deliver other drugs for treating pain, sleep, anxiety and cancer. The Syqe inhaler is sold in Israel by Teva Pharmaceuticals. Approval is also being sought to begin sales in Europe, Canada and Australia. Syqe is planning to submit a medical device application to the Food and Drug Administration in the United States.

Cost of MS Drugs Nearly Tripled

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The cost of prescriptions for disease-modifying multiple sclerosis (MS) drugs nearly tripled in the last decade, even with the introduction of cheaper generic versions, according to a new study funded by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society.

Researchers found spending on 15 MS drugs in the Medicaid program increased from $453 million in 2011 to $1.32 billion in 2017.

“Most of these drugs cost more than $70,000 per year on average and costs for these drugs are among the highest drug cost areas for private insurers as well as Medicare and Medicaid,” said Daniel Hartung, PharmD, of Oregon State University in Portland. “Unfortunately for people with MS, the introduction of a generic drug had a minimal effect on prices overall.”

Hartung and his colleagues found that when a generic version of the drug glatiramer acetate (Copaxone) was introduced in 2015, it was only 15 percent cheaper than the brand name drug made by Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Teva also worked to maintain its market share by encouraging doctors and patients to switch from a 20 mg dose of Copaxone to a 40 mg dose, which was not interchangeable with the new generic.

A second company introduced a generic version of glatiramer acetate in October 2017. Only then did the cost start to come down and generic versions started to get a greater share of the MS market.  

“After our study was complete, the company that introduced the second generic drug dropped its costs significantly, making it the lowest cost disease-modifying drug for MS on the market,” Hartung said. “Despite this, there is an urgent need for more robust competition from generics within these MS drugs.”

A similar study published last year found that Medicare paid nearly $76,000 annually per patient for disease modifying therapy (DMT), which reduces the frequency and severity of MS flare-ups. MS is a chronic and progressive disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing pain, numbness, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision, and fatigue.

Many Patients Can’t Afford DMT Meds

A recent survey by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society found that 40% of MS patients who take a DMT drug altered or stopped taking their medication due to the high cost. Only 11% said they could afford the medication without financial assistance.

“People with MS are paying the price, not only financially, but also physically and emotionally,” Bari Talente, executive vice president of advocacy for the National MS Society said in a statement.

“When someone alters or stops the use of their DMT, it can lead to increased symptoms, relapses, stress and anxiety. We need to make these medications affordable and accessible so people already facing a chronic illness don’t have to deal with deciding between buying groceries for their families or paying for their medication.”

The FDA recently approved the first generic versions of Gilenya (fingolimod) for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). A 30-day supply of brand name Gilenya 0.5mg capsules currently costs about $8,482, according to Healthcare Bluebook, or nearly $102,000 a year.

Few people actually pay the full amount for a DMT drug. About 45% of MS patients do not pay anything out-of-pocket for their DMT. The average annual cost among those who do pay is about $2,300.

Research Explores Cannabis as Treatment for MS, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s Disease

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The University of Alberta is partnering with a Canadian cannabis company in three research projects exploring the use of medical cannabis for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s diseases. 

Atlas Biotechnologies is investing nearly $300,000 over the next two years to fund the studies. Atlas operates a 38,000 square foot cannabis production facility near Edmonton and will supply customized blends of cannabis products to U of A researchers.

“People are touting (cannabis) for all kinds of things, but without solid scientific evidence,” said Ross Tsuyuki, PharmD, chair of the Department of Pharmacology at U of A. “But there likely are benefits for some conditions.”

The most well-known chemical compounds in cannabis are tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), but the plant has hundreds of other active biological chemicals, each with the potential of having therapeutic benefits. The goal of the research is to identify what specific compounds or combinations of compounds are effective.

“We've got to figure out the best combination of those compounds and how they're actually working in people,” Jeffrey Gossain, Atlas’ chief operating officer, told Folio, the University of Alberta's news site.  “A lot of people will tell you, 'My mom had cancer’ or, ‘My friend had an illness, and they took cannabis and it helped.’ But then for other people they don't have as effective results. 

“Part of the problem is that you don't really know what product they took, how they dosed it or the combinations of chemicals in the product that helped. It's not as simple as just saying, ‘The plant's got THC and CBD.’ You've got to get a lot more detailed than that.”

The research will examine whether CBD and other cannabinoids can relieve pain in patients with multiple sclerosis; if cannabis can reduce neuroinflammation and degeneration of the brain caused by Huntington's disease; and if cannabinoids have neuroprotective activity in models of Alzheimer’s disease.

“Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, multiple sclerosis and Huntington's disease are all devastating conditions that don't have a lot of effective treatments,” said Tsuyuki. “If we find something, even if it works just a little, that could be an enormous advance for patients. But we have to do our homework first, and that is where we're starting.”

In addition to its partnership with the U of A, Atlas is collaborating with Harvard Medical School in developing cannabis products for pain and other neurological conditions.

A recent study found that medical cannabis is mildly effective in relieving pain and other symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Spanish researchers analyzed 17 clinical trials involving different combinations of THC and CBD, and found cannabis had limited effectiveness in relieving pain, muscle spasticity and bladder dysfunction.

MS is a chronic and incurable disease which attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing numbness in the limbs, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision, fatigue and pain.

FDA Warns of Serious Breathing Problems Caused by Gabapentinoids

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is warning that serious breathing problems can occur in patients who use gabapentin or pregabalin with opioids or other drugs that depress the central nervous system. The elderly and patients with lung problems are at higher risk when they use the drugs, according to an FDA drug safety communication.

The advisory is the latest in a series of warnings about gabapentinoids, a class of nerve medication increasingly prescribed as an alternative to opioid painkillers. There are growing reports of gabapentinoids being abused or raising the risk of overdose and suicide.

“Reports of gabapentinoid abuse alone, and with opioids, have emerged and there are serious consequences of this co-use, including respiratory depression and increased risk of opioid overdose death,” Douglas Throckmorton, MD, deputy director for Regulatory Programs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement.

“In response to these concerns, we are requiring updates to labeling of gabapentinoids to include new warnings of potential respiratory depressant effects. We are also requiring the drug manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to further evaluate the abuse potential of gabapentinoids, particularly in combination with opioids, with special attention being given to assessing the respiratory depressant effects.”

Gabapentinoid products include gabapentin, which is marketed under the brand name Neurontin, and pregabalin, which is marketed as Lyrica. Generic versions of the drugs are also available.

Gabapentinoids were originally developed to prevent seizures, but their use has tripled over the past 15 years. The drugs are approved to treat a variety of chronic pain conditions, such as fibromyalgia, neuropathy and shingles. They are also widely prescribed off-label.

According to the FDA, over 13 million people filled a prescription for gabapentin in 2016, while over 2 million patients were prescribed pregabalin. Nearly one in five of those patients were also taking opioids.

“Pairing an opioid with any CNS depressant – a gabapentinoid, benzodiazepine, sedating antidepressant, sedating antipsychotic, antihistamine, or other product – will increase the risk of respiratory depression. Shifting treatment from one CNS depressant to another may pose similar risks,” the FDA said.

A Dozen Deaths

The agency said it received 49 case reports of serious breathing problems in patients taking gabapentinoids, including 12 people who died from respiratory depression. It’s advising doctors, caregivers and patients taking gabapentinoids to be alert for signs of confusion, disorientation, dizziness, sleepiness, slow or shallow breathing, unresponsiveness, or bluish-colored lips, fingers and toes.

A 2018 study by Australian researchers found that gabapentinoids often had side effects such as drowsiness, dizziness and nausea. Another study found that combining gabapentin with opioids significantly raises the risk of dying from an overdose. And a recent analysis of calls to U.S. poison control centers found a significant increase in suicide attempts involving gabapentin.

There have also been increasing reports of gabapentin and pregabalin being abused by illicit drug users, who have learned they can use the medications to heighten the high from heroin, marijuana, cocaine and other substances.

A recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine found little evidence that gabapentinoids should be used off-label to treat pain and said their effectiveness was often exaggerated by prescribing guidelines. The CDC’s 2016 opioid guideline recommends gabapentin and pregabalin dozens of times as alternatives to opioids, without saying a word about their abuse or side effects.

“Our goal in issuing today’s new safety labeling change requirements is to ensure health care professionals and the public understand the risks associated with gabapentinoids when taken with central nervous system depressants like opioids or by patients with underlying respiratory impairment. However, we do not want to unintentionally increase opioid use by turning prescribers away from this class of pain medications,” Throckmorton said.

FDA Approves Generic Gilenya for Treatment of MS

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the first generic versions of Gilenya (fingolimod) for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). That’s welcome news for patients who have long struggled with the exorbitant cost of many MS medications.

A 30-day supply of Gilenya 0.5mg capsules currently costs about $8,130, according to Healthcare Bluebook, or about $97,560 a year.

“Approving safe and effective generics so patients have more treatment options continues to be a priority for the FDA,” Janet Woodcock, MD, director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, said in a statement. “Having access to affordable treatments is important for patients with conditions that require ongoing care. The FDA has a longstanding commitment to increasing patient access to lower-cost, high-quality generic medicines.”

The FDA approved generic fingolimod applications from HEC Pharm Co. Limited, Biocon Limited and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited.

Until now, Novartis held the exclusive patent rights to fingolimod, which is sold under the brand name Gilenya. Nearly 300,000 people worldwide have taken Gilenya since it was approved by the FDA in 2010, according to Novartis.

MS is a chronic and progressive disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system, causing numbness in the limbs, difficulty walking, paralysis, loss of vision, fatigue and pain. For most people with MS, there are periods of remission followed by relapses or flareups as the disease progresses. Gilenya is a widely used treatment for relapsing MS.

Generic formulations are often significantly cheaper than brand name drugs. In July, the FDA approved the first generic forms of Lyrica. Today a two-month supply of Lyrica costs about $472, while the same amount of generic pregabalin costs just $21.

Maximizing Profit

Criticism about the high cost of branded MS drugs is growing. Last month when the FDA approved a new MS medication called Vumerity, drug maker Biogen set its wholesale price at $88,000 a year. That brought a rare rebuke from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, which released a statement that accused Biogen of price gouging.

It can take years for a new drug to get FDA approval and the pharmaceutical industry has long claimed that it needs to set prices high to recover the cost of research, clinical studies and drug development.

That claim is discounted in a recent article published in the journal Neurology, in which researchers asked four drug industry executives about the high cost of MS drugs. The executives were given anonymity to encourage them to speak freely.  

"I would say the rationales for the price increases are purely what can maximize profit," one executive said. "There's no other rationale for it.”

In setting the price for a new drug, executives said they primarily look at what their competitors are charging for similar medications. Companies fear that undercutting competitors with a lower price would undermine the attractiveness of their product.

"We can't come in at less," one of the executives said. "That would mean we're less effective, we think less of our product, so we have to go more."

The problem is unique to the United States, the only developed country that doesn’t have a universal healthcare system that regulates prices.

"And it is only in the United States, really, that you can take price increases. You can't do it in the rest of the world. In the rest of the world, prices decline with duration in the marketplace," another executive said.

Researchers say their study provides new insight into the economics behind pharmaceutical pricing.

"The frank information provided by these executives pulls back the curtain of secrecy on how drug price decisions are made," said co-author Dennis Bourdette, MD, chair of neurology at the Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine. "We see that it is indeed the race to make more money that is driving up drug prices and nothing more."

In the meantime, MS patients like Jennifer Hochgesang struggle to make their co-payments and deductibles. She gets injections of glatiramer acetate, a generic version of Copaxone.

“It costs over $5,500 a month. When you add my migraine medication and other medications, it adds up to over $13,000 a month. I reach catastrophic level by March in my insurance and that’s the only way I can pay for it,” Hochgesang said. “It doesn’t cost that much in Europe though and it shouldn’t cost that much here.

“It seems sick to me that companies use a drug like this to profit highly from, when people can’t reasonably afford five thousand dollars a month. I believe an MS drug should be accessible to anyone. Otherwise we are only creating medicine for the rich and those able to get insurance or be on disability, leaving the rest out in the cold. That just isn’t right.” 

Biogen Accused of Price Gouging for New MS Drug

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

FDA approval of a new multiple sclerosis (MS) drug has resulted in a big payoff for one company and sharp criticism from a patient advocacy group.

Last month the FDA approved Vumerity (diroximel fumarate) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive MS, as well as management of clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), neurologic symptoms that can be an early sign of MS — a chronic and progressive disease that attacks the body’s central nervous system.

Vumerity was jointly developed by Biogen and Alkermes. Under the terms of their operating agreement, FDA approval triggered a clause in which Biogen paid Alkermes $150 million for the worldwide commercial rights to Vulmerity, along with a share of future royalties.

Biogen said it would account for the Alkermes payment by amortizing its cost “over the expected useful life of the product.” It then announced the price of Vumerity – at a wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) in the U.S. of $88,000 per year. Biogen claimed that was “the lowest annual WAC price for oral MS disease-modifying therapies.”

MS drugs are notoriously expensive, but the $88,000 price tag for Vumerity brought a rare rebuke from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, which released a statement that basically accused Biogen of price gouging.

“Vumerity is an efficacious and tolerable treatment option for people with relapsing MS, but being priced only $500 lower than the least expensive oral disease modifying treatment, does not show the commitment to affordable access that we had hoped,” said Bari Talente, executive vice president of advocacy for the National MS Society.

“We know that high wholesale acquisition cost (WAC) prices for MS disease modifying treatments put a heavy burden on people with MS. Too many are forced to take on high out-of-pocket costs, navigate through complex systems, and face varied and unpredictable decisions by public and private payers and pharmacy benefit managers.”

The statement points out Biogen has steadily escalated the price of another MS product, Tecfidera, by $40,000 since its launch in 2013. A year’s worth of treatment with Tecfidera now costs nearly $95,000.

“We urge Biogen to publicly commit to keeping price increases lower than the rate of inflation,” Talente said.

A recent study found that prices of several MS drugs have soared over the past decade, to an average of nearly $76,000 per patient annually.

“The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries claim that the high prices reflect the expense of research and development and need to incentivize continued innovation. These claims are never backed up with transparent data,” said Daniel Hartung, PharmD, and Dennis Bourdette, MD, in an editorial in JAMA Neurology. “These drugs have long since recouped any cost of drug development, yet their prices have continued to rise.

“What is driving this increase is uncertain. However, the simplest explanation is that pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies increase prices because they can, they do it to increase their profit margins, and there are few limits on what they can charge.”

Biogen Involved in Illegal Co-Pay Charity

Biogen is one of three companies accused by federal prosecutors of paying a Florida-based charity to operate an illegal co-pay assistance program that helped Medicare patients buy high-priced MS drugs. The payments are considered kickbacks under a federal law that prohibits companies from subsidizing Medicare patients.

In a settlement announced Wednesday, The Assistance Fund (TAF) agreed to pay $4 million to resolve claims that it acted as a conduit for kickbacks from Biogen, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals.

“Pharmaceutical companies and foundations cannot undermine the Medicare program through the use of kickbacks disguised as routine charitable donations. TAF operated as a vehicle for specific pharmaceutical companies to pay kickbacks at the ultimate expense of the American taxpayers who support the Medicare program,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling.

The DOJ has been cracking down on co-pay charities and the companies that fund them. Over $840 million in fines and penalties have been collected from eight pharmaceutical companies (United Therapeutics, Pfizer, Actelion, Jazz, Lundbeck, Alexion, Astellas and Amgen) to resolve allegations that they used third-party foundations to funnel kickbacks to patients.

What You Should Know About Neuropathy

By Barby Ingle, PNN Columnist

November is Nerve Pain Awareness Month. Or as we like to call it at iPain, “NERVEmber.”

There are dozens of chronic conditions that involve nerve pain. Neuropathy is a collection of disorders that occur when nerves of the peripheral nervous system are injured or damaged. The peripheral nerves are the ones outside of the brain and spinal cord — in our arms, legs, hands and throughout the body.

There are 3 types of peripheral nerves:  

• Autonomic nerves regulate biological activities that people do not control consciously such as breathing, digesting food and heartbeat. 

• Motor nerves control movements of muscles under conscious control such as walking, grasping things and talking.

• Sensory nerves transmit information about sensory experiences such as feeling a light touch or the pain resulting from a cut.

Some neuropathies affect all three types of nerves, others affect one or two types. Some of the diagnostic terms you might hear are predominately motor neuropathy, predominately sensory neuropathy, sensory-motor neuropathy and autonomic neuropathy.  

Neuropathy often causes pain, tingling or numbness in the hands and feet. Healthcare professionals had a longstanding belief that neuropathy pain is just a symptom of an illness and therefore not a disease. 

We now know that chronic nerve pain is a disease in itself, and the medical community and public are beginning to look at it in this way.

There are approximately 150 known types of neuropathy and the causes of many are not yet known.

Thirty percent of neuropathies are caused by diabetes, 30% are idiopathic or of an unknown cause, and the other 40% are attributed to autoimmune disorders, tumors, genetic, infections, environmental toxins and nutritional imbalances.

A great resource for patients is Dr. Norman Latov’s book, “Peripheral Neuropathy: When the Numbness, Weakness, and Pain Won't Stop.” This book helps us understand the causes of neuropathies in greater detail.

We need to increase awareness, conduct research, provide better clinical training, and better tools for diagnosing and treating neuropathy. Funding for neuropathy research is difficult to obtain because clinical professionals do not fully understand all of the complexities of neuropathy diseases and conditions. Far too often, if a patient does not have a known neuropathic condition, providers will say they could not possibly have a neuropathy.

Nerve Pain Is Not Just a Symptom

But neuropathy is not just a symptom of another disease, it can be a disease in itself.  When medical professionals fail to recognize the disease or causes of neuropathy, it leads to misdiagnosis, failure to diagnose, and delays in getting proper treatment. This can cause further damage to the patient.  

I have had some doctors tell me that neuropathy does not affect the upper body, hands or face, so I could not possibly have neuropathy and it must be something else going on. Know your limitations and your healthcare providers’ limitations. Sometimes it is difficult for them to understand all of our symptoms or the daily problems we face living with neuropathy.

It is important that we increase our communication skills as patients and caregivers. Better communication allows for better care and better answers. Too often our healthcare professionals stop short of proper diagnostic procedures due to assumptions, poor attitudes, and limited treatment options available to them. They also get pressure from insurance companies that limit payments for treatment and testing. Some providers also fail to understand the potential serious impact of these conditions going undiagnosed and undertreated.  

There are times when a doctor might believe that you can do something that you know will increase your symptoms or set off a flare. Communicate these limitations to your doctor and find out their knowledge of your condition.

Here are 5 tips to better access to proper and timely care.  

1. Seek credible information, keep your mind open to new treatments and provide copies of your research to your doctor when necessary. Remember – our providers see many patients day after day and do not always have the time to do research. You may be the first one to bring new information to them.

2. With better treatment options, we will be less frustrated as patients and can make greater progress in our goal to improve daily living.

3. Use a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Include on your team of providers doctors who specialize in pain management, internal medicine, neuromuscular neurologists, physical therapists and psychologists/psychiatrists. Depending on the type of neuropathy you have, you may want to add doctors of immunology, radiology, oncology, hematology (liver), cardiology, pulmonology, orthopedics, urology, gastroenterology, podiatry, or other medical disciplines. 

4. When you read books by other patients or hear of new treatments in your social circles, be sure to have your own treating provider consult on those ideas. Patients are not one-size-fits-all. What works for someone else may not work for you.

5. Work with a healthcare provider who works with neuropathy patients on a regular basis. They tend to be more familiar with the daily challenges we face as patients.

Until research provides better answers and tools for diagnosing neuropathy, good doctor-patient communication is essential to diagnose and treat neuropathy in a timely manner.

Barby Ingle lives with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), migralepsy and endometriosis. Barby is a chronic pain educator, patient advocate, and president of the International Pain Foundation. She is also a motivational speaker and best-selling author on pain topics. More information about Barby can be found at her website. 

This column is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.  

Rare Autoimmune Disease Goes Into Remission After Stem Cell Therapy

By A. Rahman Ford, PNN Columnist

New research at Northwestern University and the Mayo Clinic confirms that we can heal ourselves with our own stem cells. A small study published in the journal Neurology found that treating a person with stem cells derived from their own blood or bone marrow can reverse a rare autoimmune disease called neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

Also known as Devic Disease, NMO is a chronic neurological disorder that causes inflammation in the optic nerve and spinal cord. Common symptoms are eye pain that can rapidly lead to blindness, and pain in the spine, legs or arms that can lead to paralysis. Bladder and bowel control may also be affected.

Neuromyelitis optica is often misdiagnosed as multiple sclerosis (MS). The normal course of treatment is high-dose corticosteroids and immunosuppressants.

In the study, 13 patients with NMO were first given drugs to suppress their immune system, followed by an infusion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCT).

The results were significant and durable. After 57 months, most patients were in remission and were off all immunosuppressive drugs.

A biological marker in the blood that correlates with NMO disease activity also disappeared.

“There is marked difference between a transplant and the drug,” said lead author Dr. Richard Burt, a professor of medicine and chief of immunotherapy and autoimmune disease at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. “The transplant improved patients’ neurological disability and quality of life. They got better, and the disease maker disappeared for up to five years after transplant.”

Two of the patients relapsed after the HSCT infusion and had to go back on drug therapy.

According to Northwestern Now, Dr. Burt is a pioneer in the field of using autologous stem cells to treat autoimmune disease. Previous research by Burt has shown that HSCT can reverse relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

When interviewed  by The Daily Northwestern about the implications of Burt’s work, Feinberg Associate Neurology Professor Dr. Roumen Balabanov predicted that chronic autoimmune diseases would be treated through “a single, radical approach” that would allow patients to live normal lives without being dependent on medications to control their symptoms.

“The point of this treatment being radical is that the patients will actually have normal lives,” Balabanov said. “They don’t have to take those lifelong medications.”

Those lifelong drugs can cost up to $500,000 per year. Conversely, the HSCT transplant costs about $100,000.

Dr. Burt is currently on sabbatical to teach his HSCT protocol at stem cell clinics around the country and to write a book. Actress Selma Blair recently had her multiple sclerosis treated by Burt’s clinic. She has been very public about her experience on social media and in interviews.

Recently the Scottish Health Technologies Group recommended HSCT be approved in Scotland to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

A. Rahman Ford, PhD, is a lawyer and research professional. He is a graduate of Rutgers University and the Howard University School of Law, where he served as Editor-in-Chief of the Howard Law Journal.

Rahman lives with chronic inflammation in his digestive tract and is unable to eat solid food. He has received stem cell treatment in China. 

The information in this column is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.