Spinal Cord Stimulators Fail to Reduce Opioid Use

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A large new study is raising questions about the long-term effectiveness of spinal cord stimulators and whether they really help patients reduce their use of opioids and other pain treatments.

Researchers at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine analyzed health data for 1,260 patients who received permanent stimulators and found that — when compared to a control group — the devices did not reduce their use of opioids, epidurals, corticosteroid injections or radiofrequency ablation after two years. About a fifth of the patients experienced complications so severe the devices had to be removed or revised.

Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are considered an invasive treatment of last resort for people with chronic back or leg pain, because the devices have to be surgically implanted near the spine and connected to batteries placed under the skin. The implants send electrical impulses into the spine to mask pain.

About 50,000 SCSs are implanted annually in the U.S. and their use is growing – in part because of the belief they’ll reduce the need for opioids and other pain therapies.

But UCSF researchers found that SCS patients actually filled more opioid prescriptions after one year than a control group of pain patients (CMM) who did not get the devices. The use of other medications and procedures by SCS patients declined slightly after one year, but there were no significant differences between the two groups after two years.

“The lack of reduction in pharmacotherapy, epidural and facet corticosteroid injections, and radiofrequency ablations at 2 years among patients receiving SCS compared with those receiving CMM suggests that SCS was providing insufficient pain relief to forego other therapies or improve rates of depression or anxiety, as prescriptions for these drug classes did not decline,” lead author Sanket Dhruva, MD, an Assistant Professor of Medicine at UCSF, wrote in JAMA Neurology.

“Because most patients still had their permanent SCS in place at 2 years, some may receive prolonged benefit from this modality, although we were not able to identify this through reductions in opioid use or nonpharmacologic pain interventions.”

Researchers also found that the total cost of care was about $39,000 higher for SCS patients in the first year, while health costs were similar for the two groups in the second year.

‘Sobering Insights’

"The findings appear to belie the popular belief that SCS may result in reduced opioid medication usage or overall fewer physician visits in the years immediately following device implant," wrote Prasad Shirvalkar, MD, and Lawrence Poree, MD, both from the UCSF Division of Pain Medicine, in an accompanying editorial.

“Using robust propensity matching, the present study provides sobering insights that SCS does not appear to reduce chronic opioid use or the utilization of health care resources compared with CMM in the first 2 years after implant. We believe this will help mitigate excessive enthusiasm of SCS as a panacea for chronic pain syndromes and illuminate biases of SCS hype cycle that can possibly be fueled by industry-related conflicts of interest.”

Stimulators are no longer limited to patients with chronic back, neck and leg pain. Last year the FDA expanded the use of SCSs to include pain from diabetic neuropathy. Stimulators are also now being used on patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

A 2018 study by a team of investigative journalists found that SCSs have some of the worst safety records of medical devices tracked by the FDA. A 2020 FDA review of adverse events involving stimulators found that nearly a third were reports of unsatisfactory pain relief. The review also identified nearly 500 deaths linked to the devices, along with nearly 78,000 injuries and 30,000 device malfunctions.

Over 72 Million Americans Suffer Chronic Low Back Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Nearly 3 out of 10 U.S. adults – 72.3 million people – currently suffer from chronic low back pain, surpassing the number of Americans who have arthritis, diabetes or heart disease, according to a large new Harris Poll. Over a third of those surveyed (36%) rate their back pain as “severe” or the “worst pain possible” and nearly half (44%) said they’ve experienced back pain for at least five years.

Over 5,000 adults participated in the online survey, which was sponsored by Vertos Medical, a company that makes medical devices to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

One of the major findings in the survey is that over a third (37%) of adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have never been told by a healthcare professional what causes their pain. The vast majority (84%) say they wish there were better treatment options for CLBP.

"These survey results demonstrate that people with chronic low back pain are suffering greatly over long periods of time, and many have resigned themselves to living in a debilitated state," Kathy Steinberg, Vice President of Media and Communications Research at The Harris Poll, said in a statement. "The fact that more than a third are not being told what is causing their pain, such as LSS or an enlarged ligament, makes it more difficult to treat that pain.”

Lower back pain is the leading cause of disability, affecting about 540 million people worldwide. With so many people suffering, you'd think there would be a consensus on the best way to treat CLBP. But a 2018 review by The Lancet found that low back pain is usually treated with bad advice, inappropriate tests, risky surgeries and painkillers -- often against treatment guidelines.

The Harris Poll found that many Americans with CLBP are being treated with ineffective therapies, resulting in multiple visits to multiple doctors. On average, the typical back pain sufferer has sought relief from at least three healthcare providers, with an average of 4 office visits in the last year.  

Over one in five (21%) have had epidural steroid injections (ESIs), with 37% having 5 or more injections. ESI’s are not FDA-approved and the agency has warned that injections into the epidural space can result in rare but serious neurological problems, including loss of vision, stroke and paralysis. ESI’s were rated as one of the least effective treatments for CLBP in the Harris Poll.

Nearly a third of those surveyed (30%) said they have been prescribed opioids and 15% said they are currently taking them, even though medical guidelines caution that opioids are not appropriate for CLBP.

Opioids may not be recommended, but nearly 8 out of 10 (79%) said the medications were very or somewhat effective, making opioids the highest rated treatment for CLBP, slightly ahead of “conservative or eastern medicine” treatments such as physical therapy, chiropractic care and acupuncture.

Source: The Harris Poll

About half of those surveyed say CLBP has a major or moderate impact on their quality of life (53%), physical health (50%) and mental health (39%). Most strongly agree or somewhat agree (78%) that they have accepted CLBP as a part of their life.  

For more information about treatment options for CLBP, visit Know Your Back Story, a website hosted by Vertos Medical that promotes treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Emergency Treatment of Arachnoiditis After Spinal Injection

By Dr. Forest Tennant, PNN Columnist

In rare cases, symptoms suggesting adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) may occur after a spinal tap or epidural injection (therapeutic or obstetrical). These early symptoms may include localized lumbar pain, headaches, burning sensations, dizziness, leg weakness and bladder dysfunction. Spinal fluid leaks or blood in the spinal canal are often suspected in these cases.  

If symptoms indicate the possibility that AA may be developing, we recommend emergency treatment to hopefully prevent the spinal nerve inflammation from spreading and becoming chronic. 

A problem that we have routinely discovered is that medical practitioners commonly have the false belief that they can see signs of AA on an MRI when symptoms begin or within a few hours or days after a spinal tap or epidural injection. But AA typically does not show on an MRI for at least four to six weeks. Consequently, early emergency treatment must be based on patient history and symptoms, rather than on MRI findings. 

At the First International Congress on Arachnoiditis and Tarlov Cysts in 2010, physicians Donna Holder and Antonio Aldrete recommended that methylprednisolone 500 mg be given intravenously every day for five days as an emergency treatment for AA.  

Since that time, a variety of intravenous methylprednisolone attempts with different dosages and frequency have been used by physicians as emergency treatment to prevent AA. Dr. Aldrete opined that intravenous methylprednisolone is only effective in preventing AA if given within 60 days after the spinal tap or epidural. 

We have used the following alternative treatments to intravenous methylprednisolone: 

1. Medrol (methylprednisolone) six-day oral dose pack

2. Ketorolac 30 to 60 mg injection for three consecutive days

3. Medroxyprogesterone 10 mg given twice a day for six days

In some, but not all cases, AA symptoms will abate during the week that either intravenous methylprednisolone or the alternative treatments are administered. In most cases, however, symptoms reduce but don’t totally abate. The reason for this is unclear, but a reasonable assumption is that spinal canal inflammation may not be totally reversed once symptoms begin. 

If pain and other symptoms don’t totally abate, we recommend that the patient begin a three-component medical protocol for AA described in this bulletin, which includes nutritional, physiologic and pharmacologic elements. Patients should remain on these medical treatments until and if their pain and other symptoms resolve. 

It is unclear why only a small percentage of persons who have spinal taps or epidural injections develop AA. It is also unknown why symptoms that begin after these procedures usually don’t abate. 

A New Handbook for Practitioners

Our new book, "Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Adhesive Arachnoiditis” is now available on Amazon. 

This handbook for medical practitioners has been written for one simple reason.  AA is no longer a rare disease.  We conservatively estimate that there are at least 1.75 to 2.75 million adults in the U.S. who have AA.  

In the past, the cause of their back pain was often listed as unknown or inappropriately labeled as failed back syndrome, degenerative spine or simply low back pain. 

It is our fervent hope that this book will help medical practitioners and their patients diagnose and treat this most debilitating disease.

Forest Tennant, MD, DrPH, is retired from clinical practice but continues his research on the treatment of intractable pain and arachnoiditis. This column is adapted from a bulletin recently issued by the Arachnoiditis Research and Education Project. Readers interested in subscribing to the bulletins should click here.

The Tennant Foundation gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.   

Researchers Urge Caution on Using Steroid Injections for Pain

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Doctors and patients should be more cautious about using corticosteroid injections for pain relief, according to new studies that warn of rare, but serious long-term complications for patients who receive epidurals during childbirth or high doses and multiple injections in their hips.

Researchers at Kaiser Moanalua Medical Center in Hawaii looked at health data for nearly 700 patients with hip osteoarthritis and found that those who received steroid injections were 8.5 times more likely to develop rapidly destructive hip disease (RDHD), a condition that causes the loss of blood flow and death of bone tissue in the hip.

Higher rates of RDHD were especially apparent in patients receiving multiple and/or high-dose injections of the steroid triamcinolone. The risk of RDHD following a single, low-dose injection was about two percent, but rose to five percent following multiple low-dose injections or a single high-dose injection, and up to 10 percent following multiple high-dose injections.

“While the risk of RDHD following a single low-dose (40 mg or less) triamcinolone injection is low, the risk is higher following high-dose (80 mg or more) injection and multiple injections. These findings provide information that can be used to counsel patients about the risks associated with this common procedure. In addition, caution should be taken with intra-articular hip injections utilizing 80 mg of corticosteroid and multiple injections,” wrote lead author Kanu Okike, MD, of Hawaii Permanente Medical Group in Honolulu.

As they became more aware of a possible link with RDHD, orthopedic surgeons at the hospital started ordering fewer hip corticosteroid injections. In subsequent years, the number of RDHD cases decreased. The hospital also added a discussion of post-injection RDHD to the informed consent process for patients and stopped performing high-dose corticosteroid injections.

The study, recently published in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, is believed to be the largest to date of patients with post-injection RDHD.

Epidural Injections

Two new studies have also found that women receiving epidural injections for pain relief during labor are at high risk of long-term headaches and chronic back pain if the needle accidentally punctures the dural lining of the spinal cord. Dural punctures or “wet taps” cause the leak of spinal fluid, which can result in serious neurological complications.  

“I’ve likely performed more than 10,000 epidurals in my lifetime, and I still have wet taps from time to time,” Pamela Flood, MD, a professor of anesthesiology at Stanford University School of Medicine, told Anesthesiology News. “But no matter how many we’ve seen, we still feel terrible about each one. We’re trying to relieve people’s pain and give them a wonderful childbirth experience, and the last thing we want to do is cause them complications.”

A study published in the journal Anaesthesia found that over half of women (58%) with an accidental dural puncture were still experiencing headaches 18 months after the epidural, and nearly half (48%) suffered from chronic low back pain. A recent study in the British Journal of Anaesthesia had similar findings.    

Dural punctures during epidurals are relatively uncommon. Women are usually warned there is a risk of short-term headaches, but not about long-term health problems.

“While this information has been creeping into our consciousness in the form of retrospective trials, only this year has it been confirmed with two large prospective trials,” Flood said. “Unfortunately, clinicians have been slow to hear this, perhaps because we don’t want to admit that the short-term concern that we have been discussing for years carries long-term consequences in a significant percentage of women.”

The two most common types of medications used during epidural injections are anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivacaine) or corticosteroids (betamethasone, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, methyl-prednisolone, triamcinolone). 

In addition to treating labor pain, epidural steroid injections are widely used for back pain. About 9 million epidural steroid injections are performed annually in the U.S., even though they are not FDA-approved. The FDA has warned that injection of steroids into the epidural space can result in rare but serious neurological problems, including loss of vision, stroke and paralysis. Some patients have also developed arachnoiditis, a chronic and painful inflammation of the spinal cord, after getting steroid injections for back pain.

My Undiagnosed ‘Growing Pains’ Nearly Killed Me

By Mikki Ingram, Guest Columnist

When I was a little girl growing up in Oklahoma, I was a tomboy. I played outside constantly no matter the season and was excited to be so close to nature. I did this in spite of frequent sprains, joint dislocations and abnormally bad “growing pains” starting at age three.

To me, those things were normal. I never thought to ask anyone about their own experiences, because my parents never made any fuss. Why should I?

As I grew up, the growing pains never stopped. I remember multiple times, as I was in the throes of puberty and even after, waking up in the middle of the night, crying and rubbing my joints. I had menstrual cramps so bad that I had to miss school. No Tylenol or ibuprofen combination would touch those pains. My dad thought I was being overly sensitive.

MIKKI INGRAM

After my daughter was born in 2003, I became extremely ill. The growing pains that I had come to regard as normal were more extreme than ever. Fatigue also swept over me. I missed the first 6 months of my daughter’s life because I was asleep for most of it.

The pain was consistent, the fatigue more so, and every doctor I went to said the same thing: “You look fine. You’re too young for this.”

I was diagnosed that year with fibromyalgia by a rheumatologist who called it a “diagnosis of convenience.” I was also advised to lose weight, eat better food and that the pain was all in my head. My primary care provider even said I should put my child up for adoption.

After months of plying me with random medications, none of which worked for this pain, I went to a hospital emergency room. The nurse that I saw is a woman I’ll never forget.

She ran an ultrasound on my gallbladder and came back saying, “You have gallstones. There are four of them and one of them is almost one and a half inches wide. You need your gallbladder out. Take these slides to your doctor and get a surgery scheduled.”

I was grateful beyond measure to her. My doctor, however, wasn’t. He didn’t see the need for urgency, so he scheduled my surgery for several months later. Meanwhile, the pain refused to stop. My fat-free diet did nothing and I was in trouble. In the ER of that same hospital, they told me that if I didn’t have the gall bladder out within two days, I’d be dead.

I filed a complaint about the doctor later. Nothing was done and he continued to practice until retirement.

That same provider sent me to a spine doctor. They were trying to figure out if the pain was coming from my back. The doctor said I needed to exercise more and do yoga, and insisted I get corticosteroid injections into my spine. I dutifully obliged the doc, getting multiple injections with no positive result. They only made the pain worse, so much so that we had to beg the doctor to stop scheduling me for them.

In 2018, at the age of 35, I was finally diagnosed with hypermobile-type Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (EDS), a connective tissue disorder that explained my lifetime of sprains, dislocations and growing pains. I also found out that those “miracle” epidural and corticosteroid injections had further damaged my connective tissues.

That damage occurred when, prior to my EDS diagnosis, I had been given both ciprofloxacin and levaquin antibiotics to treat my chronic sinus infections. Both of those medications weakened my body’s tendons and, four years later, still give me pain. The warning labels on those antibiotics specifically say they are not for people with connective tissue disorders like EDS.

People have looked at me throughout my life and accused me of everything from faking, to lying,to being a hypochondriac. I’ve been told that it’s my weight, accused of taking methamphetamine (due to my near-scurvy levels of vitamin D and having to have all of my teeth removed) and much more, all while being told, in spite of the evidence on my chart, that I am “fine” because I somehow look fine.

When I look at me, I don’t see “fine.” I see a woman who barely sleeps because of excess adrenaline due to EDS. I see a woman who has nearly died due to medical negligence. I see a woman who has permanent nerve damage due to that same negligence. I see a woman who was used by many providers as a guinea pig for their pet projects to prove that I really was “fine.”

I see a woman who now suffers from severe post-traumatic stress syndrome, as well as Impostor syndrome, due to all the times she was called a liar in spite of mountains of evidence to the contrary. I see a woman who survived in spite of it all.

Most of all, I see a woman who fights to be treated like a person with a chronic condition, multiple comorbidities and intractable pain, instead of a person who is actually “fine.” But, maybe that’s just me. 

Mikki Ingram lives in New Mexico. Mikki is a proud supporter of the Ehlers- Danlos Society.

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us. Send them to editor@painnewsnetwork.org.

Is Laughing Gas the Best Medicine for Labor Pain?

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A century ago, nitrous oxide – more commonly known as laughing gas -- was widely used in American hospitals to relieve labor pain during childbirth. But laughing gas fell out of favor as more Caesarean sections were performed and women opted more often for epidural injections for pain relief.  

Nitrous oxide is still commonly used in Europe and Australia to manage labor pain, and is beginning to regain popularity in the U.S. The inhaled anesthetic gas helps reduce anxiety and makes patients less aware of their pain, but does not eliminate it. 

“Nitrous oxide is easy for patients to use, relatively inexpensive, and will attract more patients looking for a birthing center, or more homelike type of delivery experience,” says Barbara Orlando, MD, an assistant professor of anesthesiology, perioperative and pain medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.

Orlando and her colleagues reviewed the medical records of nearly 2,000 women who used nitrous oxide during labor in five large university hospitals.

Many gave laughing gas high marks for pain control. The mean patient satisfaction rate for nitrous oxide was 7.4 (on a scale of 0 to 10). Their babies also had no adverse health effects.

Curiously, however, nearly 70 percent of the women who tried nitrous oxide switched to an epidural or another pain management method.  

“The high patient satisfaction rate and safety profile that we found should motivate other institutions nationwide to offer nitrous oxide as a pain management option to women in labor,” said Orlando, who presented her findings at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).

“Although nitrous oxide did not prevent women in labor from requesting other pain management options like an epidural, we received positive feedback from patients who said they like laughing gas as an option to manage their pain.”

Epidurals injections allow mothers to stay awake and alert throughout delivery. But they are not without risks. A poorly placed needle can damage the spine permanently, as Dawn Gonzalez discovered a few years ago.

“The blind insertion of the epidural during birth is basically playing roulette for spinal damage. Normally birthing mothers are told the only side effect possible during epidurals is a spinal headache that lasts a few days,” said Gonzalez, who developed adhesive arachnoiditis, a chronic and disabling inflammation of her spinal nerves.  

The ASA has defended the use of epidurals, calling them “one of the most effective, safest and widely used forms of pain management for women in labor.”

In a large study of over a quarter million epidurals, the risk of complications was found to be low. An “unrecognized spinal catheter” – what Dawn Gonzalez experienced – occured in only one of every 15,435 deliveries. She thinks there are better odds and safer alternatives.

“Laughing gas, Lamaze, hypnotism, meditation, water birthing and even some medications are the absolute safest and most effective forms of labor pain relief. Every woman deserves to know that when she opts for any kind of invasive spinal anesthesia, the risks are very grave and by far much more common than anybody realizes,” Gonzalez said.

Epidural Steroid Injections Won’t Solve Your Back Pain

By David Hanscom, MD, PNN Columnist

A lawsuit was in the news recently about a Kentucky doctor who refused to give his patients pain medication unless they had epidural steroid injections.

Really? I have run across this scenario many times throughout my 32 years of performing complex spine surgery. It is a huge problem from several perspectives.

First of all, epidural steroid injections don’t provide lasting relief for any indication. This is particularly true when they are recommended for neck or back pain. There is not any research paper indicating a significant benefit. Yet they continue to be administered at a high rate.

I prescribed them sparingly for acute ruptured discs, where the natural history is for them to resolve without surgery most of the time. The steroids do knock down the inflammatory response that occurs around the disc material, so it buys some time and sanity while the body heals.

I also used them occasionally for spinal stenosis (constriction of the nerves). Pain in the arms and legs would usually improve for a short period of time.

What was unexpected was that many patients that I had on the schedule for surgery would cancel because their pain would disappear when they utilized other tools to calm down the body’s stress hormones. The more favorable hormone levels changed their pain threshold.

Epidural steroid injections as a stand-alone treatment might be of some benefit, but they aren’t going to definitively solve your chronic pain. Whatever benefit that a patient may feel probably comes from the systemic effects of the drug. Steroids make everything feel better, but it’s unfortunate that there are so many severe side effects.

Let me share what happened to one patient.

Ralph was one of my favorite patients. I worked with him for over 20 years. I haven’t met a more well-intentioned human being. By the time I first met him, he had undergone over ten surgeries and was fused from his neck to his pelvis. He never had relief from his chronic back pain. I had to perform a couple of major surgeries just to get him standing up straight.

I worked hard with Ralph on a structured rehab approach with some modest success. I lost track of the number of phone calls. He had a lot of stress at home and was helping to raise a grandchild. In spite of his pain, he kept moving forward.

Then he broke through and had a dramatic decrease in his pain and better function. Ralph wasn’t pain free and his function was permanently limited because his spine was fused. But he was stable on a relatively low dose of opioids. We were both pleased.

I didn’t hear from Ralph for many years until he called me from his local hospital. He was quite ill. His entire spine was severely infected. His primary care physician, who took care of his meds, had retired. No one else would take care of his needs and he was referred to a local pain clinic, which performed a high volume of spinal injections. They would only prescribe opioids if Ralph agreed to the injections.

Not only are injections ineffective for back pain, they really don’t work in the presence of 12 prior surgeries. Ralph’s back was a mass of scar tissue, rods and bone without much of a nerve supply. There is also less blood supply in scar tissue and a much higher chance of infection. Where would you even place a needle if the whole back is fused?

We admitted Ralph and had to open up his whole spine, which was infected with several hundred milliliters of gross pus. It took another two operations to wash him out and get the wound closed. He eventually did well, and we continue to stay in touch.

Ralph had to undergo a proven ineffective procedure in a high-risk setting in order to obtain pain medications that were effective. He became seriously ill, underwent three additional surgeries with the attendant pain and misery, and the cost to society was over a hundred thousand dollars. I rest my case. 

Dr. David Hanscom is a spinal surgeon who has helped hundreds of back pain sufferers by teaching them how to calm their central nervous systems without the use of drugs or surgery.

In his book Back in Control, Hanscom shares the latest developments in neuroscience research and his own personal history with pain.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represents the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Spinal Injection Bill Would Raise Healthcare Costs

By Pat Anson, Editor

Republicans and Democrats often claim that reducing the cost of healthcare is one of their major goals. But a bipartisan bill that is sailing through Congress with little debate will do just the opposite, raising the cost of some epidural, facet joint and other spinal injections used to treat pain by as much as 25 percent for Medicare beneficiaries.

Critics say the legislation is little more than a money grab by doctors who perform the procedures, under the guise of preventing opioid addiction.

The “Post-Surgical Injections as an Opioid Alternative Act” (HR 5804) is one of nearly 60 bills to combat the opioid crisis approved last week by the House Energy and Commerce Committee. It moves to the full House for a vote.

The bill would partially reverse a decision made by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2016 to cut the Medicare reimbursement rate for epidurals and other injections.  The interventional procedures – which do not involve opioids -- can cost several hundred dollars per injection.

The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) lobbied unsuccessfully to get the reimbursement cuts overturned – until it found two Illinois Republican congressmen willing to sponsor HR 5804, Rep. John Shimkus and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi.

“We first went to the CMS, then HHS, with no success in reversing draconian cuts for interventional techniques. CMS and the administration told us that it requires an Act of Congress,” ASIPP says on its website. “As a first step toward this, Shimkus and Krishnamoorthi have introduced H.R. 5804, which reverses some of the cuts for Ambulatory Surgery Center procedures. This is only the beginning. We have many other cuts to be reversed.”

According to OpenSecrets.org, Shimkus and Krishnamoorthi have both received $10,000 in campaign donations from ASIPP. The organization has spent over $500,000 on lobbying and donations so far in the 2017-2018 election cycle.

‘I Find It Hard to Trust CMS’

Shimkus introduced the ASIPP bill on May 15th and two days later helped shepherd it through its first and only hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

During the hearing, Shimkus claimed that by cutting the cost of spinal injections, CMS created a disincentive for doctors to perform the procedures and encouraged them to prescribe opioids instead.

“A lot of us were surprised to see CMS reduce the reimbursement rate for non-opioid pain treatments like epidurals for post-surgery pain,” Shimkus said. “I find it hard to trust CMS when those of us in this arena think their cut has led to more opioid use.

“A lot of us believe the inability to use epidurals to treat pain and prescribe opioids is not healthy for our country.”

To be clear, the CMS reimbursement cuts do not prevent any doctor from performing injections – it only made the shots less profitable. And Shimkus offered no evidence that the lower reimbursement rates encourage more opioid use – although he convinced many of his colleagues that they did.  

“I do think it's important in this crisis to be specific with CMS to make sure that we are not discouraging the use of non-opioid alternatives based on reimbursement-related issues,” said Rep. Larry Bucshon, MD (R-IN), who is a cardiologist. “In my experience over the years, CMS makes reimbursement decisions based on the financial incentives to do so, not necessarily, in my opinion, based on what is the appropriate therapy.”

“I don't agree that epidurals are not an alternative (to opioids) already. They are. They are. I just had a conversation with a surgeon about that. So that's not so,” said Rep. Anna Eshoo (R-CA).  “Imagine being able to manage pain without taking an opioid. We could do 20 other things together and it wouldn't equal that."

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) wasn’t buying any of it.

“I don’t think we have gotten any objective criteria to suggest that what CMS did is going to lead to more people taking opiates,” Pallone said. “I don't think there is any evidence to suggest that this legislation will lead to decreased opioid prescribing or a decreased prevalence of addiction.

“I think we are setting a bad precedent with the bill. I don't think that we, as Congress, are in a good position to pick and choose winners amongst therapies and procedures. I just don't think we know enough to understand the consequences of doing that to understand the relative value and the efficacy of different therapies and procedures on the market.”

Despite those concerns -- and after just 30 minutes of debate that included no public testimony -- committee members overwhelmingly supported the bill by a vote of 36 to 14. Nine Democrats joined with all Republicans on the committee in voting yes.

“What we are doing is temporarily reversing cuts to non-opioid treatment that we all agree save money and lives, then collecting to help ensure we are reimbursing providers at the most appropriate levels possible,” Shimkus said.

“That’s ASIPP talking,” says Terri Lewis, PhD, a researcher and longtime advocate for the pain community. “What does Shimkus know? Shimkus doesn’t know anything. There is no data to support that.”

Health Risks of Spinal Injections

There was no discussion by the committee about the effectiveness of epidurals and other spinal injections -- or of the health risks associated with their use.

Epidural injections have long been used to relieve pain during childbirth, but they are also increasingly being used to treat back pain, despite reports there is little evidence the shots are effective.

The FDA has also warned that the use of steroids in spinal injections – a procedure that’s never been approved by the agency -- “may result in rare but serious adverse events, including loss of vision, stroke, paralysis, and death.”

“Here we have a procedure that they’re trying to slip under the swimming pool fence that is not FDA approved, that relies on materials that are not regulated and/or contraindicated, and they’re trying to pull a fast one. And they could very easily do it in this climate of opioid hysteria,” said Lewis.

As PNN has reported, some pain management experts believe spinal injections are overused – in part because they’re more profitable for doctors than using opioids or other procedures.  

“Probably everything that gets compensated well is over-utilized because it’s the compensation system. It’s a reimbursement system that pays more for treatment procedures than outcomes,” said Lynn Webster, MD, a past president of the American Academy of Pain Medicine.

A 2012 report by the General Accounting Office – a report requested by Rep. Pallone – found that unsanitary injection practices in ambulatory care clinics expose thousands of patients every year to blood borne pathogens such as hepatitis and HIV.  A perfectly sanitary needle can also go astray and puncture sensitive membranes in the spinal cord, leaving patients with serious and sometimes permanent injuries.      

“When it comes to spinal injections after surgery the risk to the patient, related to adverse events, increases substantially because spine surgery comes with risks of dural tears and accidental cuts,” says Terri Anderson, a Montana woman whose spine was damaged after receiving steroid injections for a ruptured disc in her back.  She now suffers from adhesive arachnoiditis, a chronic inflammation in the spinal membrane that causes severe pain.

“It is unconscionable that harmful injections would be pushed on unsuspecting pain patients,” Anderson said in an email to PNN. “It looks like the large hospital corporations and interventional pain professional societies have been busy lobbying our congressional representatives.  Apparently our healthcare system has become a profitable venture that indirectly contributes to many election campaigns in the U.S.”

No date has been set for a full House vote on HR 5804. To become law, it must pass both the House and Senate and then be signed by President Trump.  There is little opposition to the bill because many critics only recently learned that it was even being considered by Congress. 

“If this is allowed to stand, we have a problem,” says Lewis. “Another thing is Congress directing the practice of medicine. We’ve had just about enough of that.”

Steroid Injections Provide Little Relief for Back Pain

By Pat Anson, Editor

Steroid injections provide only short term relief for patients suffering from chronic low back pain, according to a new study funded by the French Ministry of Health that was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Researchers evaluated 135 patients with discopathy – degenerative disc disease -- who were being treated at three different clinics in France. Half the patients were assigned to a control group and the rest received a single glucocorticoid (steroid) injection into their lower back.

A little over half of the patients who received the injection reported positive effects on back pain after one month. But the effect was only temporary and decreased over time, with no differences in back pain intensity after 12 months when compared to the control group.

“Given these findings, the researchers question the efficacy of glucocorticoid injections as a treatment for chronic low back pain,” the American College of Physicians said in a news release.

The French study adds to a growing body of evidence questioning the effectiveness and safety of steroid injections into the spinal area.

A 2015 report by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) found little evidence that epidural steroid injections were effective in treating low back pain. Researchers said the injections often provide immediate improvements in pain and function, “but benefits were small and not sustained, and there was no effect on long-term risk of surgery.”

A 2014 study by the AHRQ also found that epidural injections did little to relieve pain in patients with spinal stenosis.  

Epidural injections, which have long been used to relieve pain during childbirth, are increasingly being used as an alternative to opioids in treating back pain. The shots have become a common and sometimes lucrative procedure at many pain management clinics, where costs vary from as little as $445 to $2,000 per injection.

The Food and Drug Administration has never approved the use of steroids to treat back pain, but several million epidural steroid injections are still performed “off label” in the U.S. annually.

The American College of Physicians (ACP) recently released new guidelines saying there was little evidence that steroid injections are effective as a treatment for low back pain.

“Moderate-quality evidence showed no differences in pain between systemic corticosteroids and placebo and no to small effect on function in patients with radicular low back pain,” the ACP said.

Lower back pain is the world's leading cause of disability. Over 80 percent of adults have low back pain at some point in their lives.

Studies Promote Epidurals Without Explaining Risks

By Pat Anson, Editor

Two recent studies presented at a meeting of anesthesiologists are promoting the benefits of epidurals to relieve pain during child birth. But a woman whose spinal cord was permanently damaged by an epidural says new mothers need to be told more about the risks involved.

First, about those studies.

A study of over 200 women presented at the annual meeting American Society of Anesthesiologists found that epidurals – in addition to relieving labor pain – also appear to lower the risk of postpartum depression for new mothers.

"Labor pain matters more than just for the birth experience. It may be psychologically harmful for some women and play a significant role in the development of postpartum depression," said Grace Lim, MD, director of obstetric anesthesiology at Magee Women's Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

"We found that certain women who experience good pain relief from epidural analgesia are less likely to exhibit depressive symptoms in the postpartum period."

The second study found that women who chose nitrous oxide – laughing gas – to manage labor pain get only limited relief. And a majority wind up getting an epidural anyway once the pain starts.

"Nitrous oxide is gaining interest among expectant mothers as an option to manage labor pain and is becoming more widely available in the United States," said Caitlin Sutton, MD, an obstetric anesthesiology fellow at Stanford University School of Medicine. "However, we found that for the majority of patients, nitrous oxide does not prevent them from requesting an epidural. While nitrous oxide may be somewhat helpful, but epidural anesthesia remains the most effective method for managing labor pain."

Epidurals are effective at relieving pain, but how safe are they?

“By far the gas is safest form of pain relief for women during labor, along with other non-invasive methods,” says Dawn Gonzalez, whose spinal cord was accidentally punctured by an epidural needle during childbirth. “Epidural anesthesia is the most popular form of anesthesia during labor, but women are rarely warned about the long term, devastating effects and consequences that some women will encounter.”

The injury to Gonzalez’s spine during the botched epidural led to the development of adhesive arachnoiditis, a chronic inflammation that caused scar tissue to form and adhere to the nerves in her spine. She now suffers from severe chronic pain and is disabled. Gonzalez says the pain she experiences today is far worse than the temporary labor pain she would have experienced without an epidural.

“The blind insertion of the epidural during birth is basically playing roulette for spinal damage. Normally birthing mothers are told the only side effect possible during epidurals is a spinal headache that lasts a few days. True informed consent is missing from the equation,” says Gonzalez.

“I often wish I could go back and decline the epidural because arachnoiditis has completely turned my life and that of my family upside down. I had so many dreams for the future with my children, and there is so much I miss out on and will never reach due to being injured during my epidural.”

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has long defended the use of epidurals, calling the risk of complications a “myth.” The ASA has called the procedure “one of the most effective, safest and widely used forms of pain management for women in labor.”

A study of over a quarter million epidurals by the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology also found the risk of complications to be low. An “unrecognized spinal catheter” – what Dawn Gonzalez experienced – occurred in about one in 15,435 deliveries.

She thinks there are better and safer alternatives.

“Laughing gas, Lamaze, hypnotism, meditation, water birthing and even some medications are the absolute safest and most effective forms of labor pain relief. Every woman deserves to know that when she opts for any kind of invasive spinal anesthesia, the risks are very grave and by far much more common than anybody realizes,” Gonzalez says. “We have a tendency to think it will ‘never happen to me,’ but you do take very serious risks for yourself and your child when opting for an obstetric epidural.”

One hundred years ago, laughing gas was widely used in hospitals to relieve pain during childbirth, but it fell out of favor as more Caesarean sections were performed and women needed more pain relief.  Nitrous oxide helps reduce anxiety and makes patients less aware of pain, but it does not eliminate it. 

In the laughing gas study of nearly 4,700 women who gave birth vaginally at a U.S. obstetric center, only 148 patients chose to use nitrous oxide. Nearly two out of three wound up getting an epidural once labor began.

What Next for Arachnoiditis Patients?

By Pat Anson, Editor

A pioneering two-day conference on arachnoiditis has ended in Helena, Montana with dozens of  patients armed with new information about the chronic and disabling spinal disease.

Many are also left wondering who will treat them and how to pay for it.

"We practitioners need your help and you need our help," says Forest Tennant, MD, who is the world's foremost authority on arachnoiditis, a progressive and incurable inflammation of the spinal cord that leaves most people who have it with severe chronic pain.

Tennant, who treats about 60 arachnoiditis patients from around the country at his pain clinic in West Covina, California, has developed a complex and unique therapy for arachnoiditis that combines pain medication, anti-inflammatory drugs, vitamins and hormones. Once bedridden or using walkers, several of his patients were healthy enough to make the long trip to Montana to hear him speak.

"I would not dare prescribe these drugs if I didn't have control of the opioids and everything else you're doing. These things are hazardous in the hands of the inexperienced," he warned.

At age 75, Tennant knows it is time for other doctors to learn and start practicing his treatment methods.  But he and his patients face a dilemma. Most pain management doctors and specialists already have a full patient load and Tennant himself is not taking new patients.

"Every good specialist in this country is booked. They're not available and they don't know anything about this anyway," says Tennant.

"Pain management really is its own specialty now and if they're not in that field, they're not going to help you do this. These hormones are going to have to be done by the same doctor that manages your pain and manages your inflammation. It's going to have to be done by the same practitioner."   

If attendance at the conference is any indication, finding doctors willing to learn and practice Tennant's treatment protocol will be difficult. Invitations went out to over two thousand practitioners in Montana, but only a handful showed up.  No one from the Montana Medical Association or the Montana Board of Medical Examiners attended.

"The problem with this protocol in the conventional medical world is that this crosses disciplines. We're talking rheumatologists, we're talking endocrinologists, and that's where conventional medicine gets stuck," says Christine White, ND, a naturopathic physician from Missoula who attended the conference. "Conventional medicine has evolved into this realm where the general practitioner doesn't do a lot. They refer out (to specialists) and what we need to do as physicians is get general practitioners willing to take on more rings of this problem."

The problem may be a bigger one that anyone imagines. Tennant estimates as many as one million Americans may suffer from arachnoiditis, many of them misdiagnosed with “failed back syndrome” or other spinal problems.

Most people get the disease when the arachnoid membrane that surrounds their spinal cord is damaged during surgery or punctured by a needle during an epidural steroid injection. Inflammation sets in and can spiral out of control, forming scar tissue that cause spinal nerves to stick together. That leads to adhesive arachnoiditis and neurological problems, which can cause burning or stinging pain that can be felt from head to toe.

Insurance Won't Pay the Bills

Besides getting treatment, another common problem faced by arachnoiditis sufferers is their insurance coverage.

"The reimbursement structure is part of the problem and the reason why I ended up with adhesive arachnoiditis," says Terri Anderson, who as a federal employee was covered by Blue Cross Blue Shield when she went to get treatment for back pain.

"I think the doctors and surgeons looked at my Blue Cross Blue Shield and they wanted to do epidural steroid injections and spinal surgery. Blue Cross had good coverage for all these invasive procedures, so I think they have some culpability," she said

Like many arachnoiditis patients, Anderson is not reimbursed for the unusual drugs and hormone therapy that she gets "off label" from Dr. Tennant or for the cost of traveling to see him in California. Her out of pocket expenses add up to about $200 a month.

"My co-pays for my medications are about $500 a month," says Nancy Marr of Los Angeles, who is insured through Medicare and a supplemental policy with AARP. Marr doesn't have to travel far to see Tennant, but she does have to pay out-of-pocket for his services.

"To participate in this kind of a program at this point in time would end up costing people a tremendous amount of out-of-pocket costs," she says.

While all of this is discouraging, the mood was anything but gloomy at the conference. For many, including this reporter, it was their first chance to meet and interact with people they've been communicating with online for years. That sense of community and a common goal stirs optimism. And so does the knowledge that the conference may have laid the groundwork for a treatment that could ultimately benefit thousands of people who are suffering.

New Treatment Gives Hope to Arachnoiditis Patients

By Pat Anson, Editor

Dozens of pain patients and physicians are meeting in Helena, Montana this weekend at a pioneering medical conference focused on arachnoiditis -- a progressive spinal disease long thought to be incurable that leaves many patients disabled with chronic back pain.

The conference is being led by Dr. Forest Tennant, a pain management physician from southern California, who has developed a unique protocol to treat arachnoiditis with a combination of pain medication, hormones and anti-inflammatory drugs. Unable to get the same type of therapy where they live, desperate patients from as far away as Maine, Alaska and Florida have been traveling to see Tennant for treatment at his pain clinic in West Covina, a Los Angeles suburb.

“We’re making history today. In all my wildest dreams I never thought we’d be having an arachnoiditis seminar in my home state,” said Gary Snook, a Montana native and a patient of Tennant for over a decade. “If there is one thing that we can learn today, it's that this hopelessly incurable disease that we suffer from is not as hopeless as we once thought.”

It was Kate Lamport’s idea to have Tennant give a seminar on arachnoiditis in her hometown of Helena. The 33-year old mother of four developed spinal pain after a series of epidurals for child birth and bulging discs in her back. She was diagnosed with arachnoiditis last year and went to see Dr. Tennant in California.

“As I learned more about arachnoiditis, I realized how many people were struggling just getting a diagnosis and treatment,” Lamport says. “There are so many people who want to go see Dr. Tennant, but they can’t. He’s booked and they can’t afford to travel, so I wanted to put something together to give people an opportunity to come see him and learn from him.”

The arachnoitditis conference is not just for patients. Several physicians and practitioners are also attending, hoping to learn some of the therapies Tennant has developed over the past decade.  

FOREST TENNANT, MD

“Physicians are simply not getting the education and training they need,” says Tennant. “I am just so frustrated by all of the patients who are calling and all of the physicians that are calling, the demand for knowledge. And so we need a new way of doing some training and some education. And this is my first attempt to step outside of the educational box, if you will, and see if this is a mechanism that will successful.”

Tennant has conducted extensive research on the disease and has launched an Arachnoiditis Education Project for physicians. He says patients respond much better to treatment when arachnoiditis is in its early stages, when the inflammation is limited to the arachnoid membrane that surrounds the spinal cord.

As the disease progresses, the inflammation causes scar tissue to build around spinal nerves, which begin to adhere or stick together, leading to adhesive arachnoiditis -- which causes severe pain and other neurological problems, such as burning and stinging sensations that can radiate from the back down to the feet. More advanced stages of arachnoiditis can lead to paralysis.

Growing Number of Cases

Once considered rare, arachnoiditis is appearing more frequently as interventional pain physicians perform more surgeries and epidural steroid injections as alternatives to opioids for back pain. Tennant estimates as many as one million Americans may suffer from arachnoiditis, many of them misdiagnosed with “failed back syndrome” or other spinal conditions. He says every pain practice in the country needs to familiarize itself with arachnoiditis.

“We’ve had a decade of some marvelous science that no one talks about. We talk about opioids, epidurals and all the problems, but we don’t talk about the good things that have happened scientifically that have helped us develop a protocol to treat spinal cord inflammation,” Tennant told Pain News Network.

One discovery is the role that specialized cells in the brain and spinal cord – called microglial cells -- have in protecting and nourishing nerve cells. When glial cells become hyperactive in response to an injury, they trigger an inflammatory response that causes chronic pain.  That inflammation needs to be addressed with corticosteroids, says Tennant, or pain medications will never be effective.

The second discovery is that the central nervous system uses oxytocin, progesterone, pregnenolone and other hormones to regulate microglial cells. Hormone supplements and injections can be used to boost hormone levels and keep microglial cells at healthy levels.

“These two discoveries are profound. If it had not been for these two things, we would not be doing this seminar. The protocol that I’ve developed is because of these discoveries,” says Tennant.

Treatment Lowers Use of Opioids

Tennant’s treatment protocol is complex and requires the “off-label” use of several different medications. But many of his patients report they’ve been able to lead more productive and active lives, while reducing their use of opioid pain medication.

“It’s allowed me to be more active. I’m less exhausted, I get around better. I don’t have to use a walker as much,” says Rhonda Posey of Texas, who started seeing Tennant in April. “I’m smiling more. I’ve got better spirit and I have hope.”

“I actually believe that I was close to dying last year,” says Nancy Marr of Los Angeles, who suffered from arachnoiditis for a decade before she started seeing Tennant last year. “I went to see Dr. Tennant because my pain physician all of a sudden was threatening to withdraw all of my opioid medication.”

Blood tests revealed that Marr had low hormone levels and her inflammatory markers were “off the charts.” After treatment by Tennant, she’s only taking half the oxycodone she used to need for breakthrough pain.   

“My inflammatory markers are within normal range and my hormone levels are up. I’m feeling much better. I do have flares, but I can do a lot more,” she says.

“I’m on less pain medication now than I’ve been on for years,” said Jerry Davis of Arizona, who believes his back problems stem from a case of meningitis. “I got off the fentanyl. I got off all the other stuff."

Davis said he can usually sleep through the night, no longer has to spend some days in bed, and can lead a fairly normal life.

"I wasn’t in a wheelchair, but I probably would be by now if I hadn’t found him,” he says.

At age 75, Tennant isn’t sure how much longer he’ll be practicing. But he’s determined to share what he’s learned with other doctors, so they can provide the same treatment and hope he's given to arachnoiditis patients. Tennant is planning to host another arachnoiditis seminar in Hattiesburg, Mississippi this October.

What Arachnoiditis Did to Me

By Shane Schwartz, Guest Columnist

I injured my back lifting tiles and went through every possible treatment, including physical therapy, steroid injections and a host of other things before finally deciding to have surgery. I couldn't take the pain any longer.

After speaking with the neurosurgeon, I elected to proceed and had a 360 degree 2 level fusion at L4-S1 with plating and decompression. It was quite an extensive surgery lasting over 9 hours. I did okay for the first 6 months and was placed in physical therapy as part of my rehabilitation -- supposedly to get back to 80% of my normal health.

Well it fell apart shortly after that and I underwent another round of epidural injections in hopes of some sort of relief, but to no avail.

After being kicked to the curb by my neurosurgeon and being told of all kinds of different diagnoses which made absolutely no sense, I went to the Oklahoma University Medical Center because I was told I had a brain tumor by the crooked neurosurgeon’s partners in crime.

Upon arriving at the hospital, I said I needed a brain scan because of what the doctors who did my spine surgery had told me. The doctors at OU pretty much laughed after a physical exam of me. They scheduled me for spinal imaging and that is the first time I ever heard of Arachnoiditis. My father is a nurse anesthetist and he was very concerned when he heard that word being used.

Suddenly everything started fitting into place as to what was happening to my body. Look at the before and after pictures of me. My heart goes out to everyone dealing with this.

I sent my MRIs scans to a very qualified physician who specializes in this disorder and went to visit with him after reviewing my scans. He confirmed it was Adhesive Arachnoiditis.

Folks, this disorder is so much more than a spine issue. It robs me of everyday life as I once knew it.

I'm 41 years old, but feel as if I'm 90. No disrespect to the elders, please don't misunderstand me, but it causes unrelenting pain throughout my entire body.

BEFORE AND AFTER PHOTOS OF SHANE SCHWARTZ

I just want to be able to enjoy life with my children again. I have a 17 and 8 year old who have basically had their father stolen from them.

This disorder needs to be on the front burner of every doctor doing any kind of spine surgery, as I was NEVER warned of anything even remotely close to this as a side effect.  I question almost daily if tomorrow is even worth it. This is no way to live.

The spine surgeons keep getting richer at the public expense and when something of this nature occurs, you are like a tin can and kicked to the next doctor, who may or may not take you. From my experience no doctor wants to deal with Arachnoiditis once they hear the word. WHY?!?!? I am a human being!!!! Not a tin can that can just be kicked around and down the road because these doctors don’t want to deal with it or own it!!!

It's so very frustrating, depressing, and my anxiety is through the roof. It's just HORRIBLE!!!

God bless anyone and everyone who has this disorder and has to deal with it on a daily basis. I am open to conversing with others in my shoes. I love and wish us all the best and thanks for reading.

Shane Schwartz lives in Oklahoma.

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Our Search for a New Pain Doctor

By Marlee Hanson, Guest Columnist

I am 31, and my husband Ray is 34.  Ray is disabled.  His biggest daily struggle is chronic pain from  a serious back injury. Adding to our troubles is that we live in Montana, a state where there is an acute shortage of doctors willing to treat chronic pain with pain medication.
 
Ray has undergone multiple surgeries to fuse his spine.  We went into these surgeries knowing he would lose some range of motion, but hopeful that they would lessen his pain, allowing Ray to be the husband and father he desperately wants to be.  Sadly, the surgeries were difficult, the recoveries were long, and his pain has only worsened postoperatively.  The disappointment has been crushing.
 
Interventional pain procedures have sadly failed to help my husband as well.  He has endured diagnostic CT myelograms and developed post-procedure cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks.  One was severe enough to require an epidural blood patch.  A CSF leak causes vomiting and a severe headache commonly known as a spinal headache.  These are not only painful, but can lead to meningitis.  The primary treatment is bed-rest.  When this fails, an epidural blood patch is performed.  Though it relieves the headache in most cases, it puts the patient at further risk of developing meningitis.

On many days my husband is not able to move, get out of bed, prepare food, or even take a simple shower because the pain is so severe.  Thankfully, Ray has found relief through opioids. Oxycodone allows him to function so he can be a husband and father.  It gives him enough relief that he is able to stretch and do physical therapy exercises. 

Exercise has also allowed him to rebuild muscle, improve stamina and helped decrease his pain.  None of this would be possible without the pain relief opioids provide him. Unfortunately, we fear my husband is weeks away from losing access to the one medication that truly gives him relief, as his physician’s license has been suspended.

Once we knew this was a possibility, Ray and I began seeking a new doctor to treat him. I believe my husband is a low risk patient.  He takes his medication as prescribed, does not abuse it, and has never been discharged by a doctor for misusing his medication. He has never overdosed. 

ray and marlee hanson

So far we have scheduled appointments with two doctors. The first one neither examined my husband nor reviewed the X-Rays and MRI’s we brought to the appointment. This physician made his treatment decision based on the prescription monitoring database and gave my disabled husband a prescription for one quarter of what he usually takes in a month, along with a pamphlet on vocational rehabilitation. 

We told the doctor Ray had already consulted vocational rehabilitation when it was suggested by his workers compensation caseworker.  We explained to the doctor how much opioids have reduced his pain and improved his ability to function.  The doctor said it was simply not worth the risk of his license being suspended.

Years ago, workers’ compensation and Social Security deemed that Ray was disabled, based on input from several physicians.  We felt this new doctor was not listening, and we were disappointed when he refused to provide the chronic pain management my husband needs. 
 
We were still hopeful that the second doctor, who was recommended by a friend, would assume responsibility for his care.  Ray waited five months for this appointment.  The day before the appointment, the doctor's office called to cancel, stating she would not see Ray for pain management. She also refused to fill his prescription.  He has taken these medications with good functional benefit for the past eight years.

We used to travel to Missoula for chronic pain management.  The trip was inconvenient and the long drive exacerbated his pain.  Eventually we were fortunate enough to find a physician in Helena near our home.  Unfortunately, we will now be forced to travel for appointments once again and deal with all that this entails.  Our next appointment will be in Great Falls.  If Ray does not receive care there, not only will we be forced to travel out of state, but my husband will also have exhausted his supply of medication. 

Ray is a law abiding citizen with a chronic pain condition that needs to be addressed.  Finding care is nearly impossible in the current regulatory climate.  I fear deeply that one day he will escape his pain by suicide.  Ray is not suicidal at all, but I fear if he is forced to go without medication, he will become bound to bed in pain, and I fear that suicide will be the outcome.

The government is looking at opioid pain relievers as harmful substances.  When these medications are illicitly used and abused there is a problem.  That problem does need to be addressed.  However, as harmful as those medications have been for some, they are just as helpful for others.  We do not need laws restricting or banning opioids; we need a nationwide effort to ease the suffering of those who are in pain.  We need doctors and practitioners who are trained in proper use & dosage of pain medication, as well as alternative pain treatment. 

Physicians need to look at chronic pain patients as individuals, just as they do with other patients.  Each condition varies in severity and everyone metabolizes drugs differently.  Please allow doctors to prescribe the medications Ray needs to survive so can be the husband and father he wants to be.  His children and I deserve that, as does he. 

Marlee and Ray Hanson live in Montana.

Pain News Network invites other readers to share their stories with us.  Send them to:  editor@PainNewsNetwork.org. 

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

Epidurals May Harm Newborn Babies

By Pat Anson, Editor

We’ve written before about the risks associated with epidural injections used to relieve back pain and pain during childbirth. Now comes word that epidural analgesia may also have adverse effects on newborns.

A large study by researchers at the University of Granada in Spain found that babies born after their mothers were given epidurals had a small decline in their overall health, were less likely to begin early breast feeding, and were significantly more likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care. Resuscitation was also significantly more frequent in babies born after epidural analgesia.

The study, published in Midwifery magazine, involved over 2,600 babies born between 2010 and 2013 at San Juan de la Cruz hospital in Úbeda, a province of Jaén, Spain

"A series of adverse effects have been observed both on the mother and on the baby,” said lead author Concepción Ruiz Rodríguez, a professor in the Department of Nursing of the University of Granada.

“Adverse effects observed on the baby are attributed to a direct pharmacological effect, due to a placental transmission of the drug administered to the mother, or due to an indirect secondary effect as a consequence to the physiological changes the drug causes in the mother, such as hormonal changes."

Researchers measured the overall health of the babies by using Apgar index values, a quick test applied to newborn babies to assess their general health. They found the Apgar values were “slightly but significantly lower” in newborns whose mothers had epidurals.

“Epidural analgesia may have adverse effects on newborns, although the risks are low, and further research is required to elucidate the causal nature of this relationship,” said Ruiz Rodriguez. "For that, we consider that it's important that both mothers and health professionals (obstetricians and midwives) know and have in mind those risks when the time for taking a decision comes.”

Epidurals involve the injection of steroids, opioids or other analgesic drugs through a catheter. The injection blocks the transmission of pain signals through nerves in the spinal cord.

Epidurals are commonly used to relieve pain during childbirth and, while the risks are low, they can result in complications for the mother such as headaches, difficulty breathing, seizures, or damage to the spinal cord. Drugs used during epidurals also pass through the placenta to the baby.

Epidurals injections are given to millions of Americans each year for back pain and there is growing controversy over their use. A study by federal researchers last year found that steroid injections provide limited or no relief  from radiculopathy and spinal stenosis, two conditions that cause low back pain.

A number of prominent physicians have told Pain News Network the shots are overused, with some patients getting dozens of injections, which raises their risk of complications.