A Pained Life: Tincture of Time

 By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

“Tincture of time” is a medical maxim. Wait it out. Let's see what happens. Give it time. 

But when you have pain from trigeminal neuralgia, like I do, even a few seconds is too long to wait. Yet it takes time for pills to work. 

I don’t take my codeine prescription before the pain gets bad. I wait until the pain starts, then I take a pill. I hate taking codeine. It makes me feel awful, dry-mouthed and cloudy-headed. It takes about 15 to 20 minutes before it kicks in.  

Unless I let the pain get out of hand by continuing to do things that make it worse, I find my pain usually starts to calm down on its own, in about 20 minutes. The same amount of time it takes for the codeine to work. 

Maybe it's worth the wait. So many of us in pain are complaining, rightfully, that their doctors have reduced their meds or even stopped them completely. It's an awful situation, but one that may have some answers in the self-help column. 

When my pain starts, I no longer immediately head for the codeine bottle. I stop what I'm doing (which may not be possible for many of us), and wait the 20 minutes or so it would have taken for the codeine to help. And, thanks to tincture of time, I am better. Not always; but more often than not.

Tincture of time is one way for us to deal with the pain -- and simultaneously allows us to save pills for when the pain really does gets get out of hand.

It also has a downside. Many of us have lived with our pain for years or, like me, for decades. You get used to it, or as used to pain as one can get. I no longer talk about the pain unless I'm specifically asked about it. Then I usually just “pooh-pooh” it. I am so accustomed to pain that it is now a part of me. And I would rather not talk about it.

I do this with doctors. Any doctor that I see must know what my situation is, just by reading the names of the pain I have. They should know, so I don't make a big deal out of it. 

In that case, a tincture of time is harmful. I dismiss the pain even when I'm asking for help. They respond by not taking me seriously or thinking, “Well, her pain can't be that bad.”

Time can be an enemy or a friend. It may be the medicine we need or one that we need to ignore.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

FDA Urged to Regulate Poppy Seeds

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

A consumer advocacy group is once again calling on the Food and Drug Administration to establish and enforce regulations that limit opiate contamination of poppy seeds.

Over a year ago, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CPSI) petitioned the FDA to set a safe threshold for opiate alkaloids in imported poppy seeds, most of which come from Afghanistan. The tiny black seeds can become contaminated with trace amounts of codeine, morphine and other opiates when they are harvested from opium poppies.

Washed poppy seeds are often found in baked goods, but drug users have found they can use unwashed seeds to make a potent homemade tea. PNN has reported that some pain sufferers use the tea as an analgesic, although the bitter brew is mostly consumed by people who simply want to get high.     

In its petition, CSPI cited a study estimating that 19 people in the U.S. suffered fatal overdoses involving poppy seeds in recent years.

In a letter recently sent to the FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, CSPI renewed its call for the agency to take action to prevent more deaths.

“The time is overdue for the FDA to establish standards that will protect U.S. consumers from ingesting dangerous levels of opiates through the food supply,” wrote Peter Lurie, MD, President of CSPI wrote.  

The European Food Safety Authority established maximum levels of morphine and codeine in poppy seeds last year, which are scheduled to take effect in July.

In 2019, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration classified unwashed poppy seeds as a Schedule II controlled substance and closed a loophole that allowed them to be sold legally in the U.S.  

Enforcement actions since then have been scant. In October 2021, federal regulators filed a civil forfeiture action against an Oklahoma bakery to halt the sale of unwashed seeds. But within a few weeks the company was selling them again on its website, with a disclaimer saying the seeds “may contain trace amounts of opiate alkaloid residue” and should be thoroughly washed before consuming.

To date, the only action the FDA has taken on the CSPI petition was to post a notice in the Federal Register asking for public comment on the need for poppy seed regulation. Over 3,000 people responded, most of them supporting the petition. Asked to comment on the CSPI’s new letter, an FDA spokesperson said the issue remains under review.

“As part of our review of CSPI’s petition, we are considering the points raised in the petition and the over 3,200 comments submitted to the docket. The FDA has been engaging with other federal partners in this effort to help protect the public’s health,” the spokesperson told PNN in an email. 

To be clear, consuming unwashed poppy seeds is risky. Home brewers usually have no way of knowing where the seeds came from or how heavily they are contaminated with opiates. The Internet is filled with cautionary stories from illicit drug users who nearly overdosed or became addicted to the tea and went into withdrawal when they tried to taper.

“I woke up yesterday with a migraine (that’s typical when I quit) and by the afternoon the withdrawals had started: sweating, anxious, can’t get comfortable, want to crawl out of my skin,” a person recently posted on Reddit. “I want to get off this merry go round. I feel like my brain is totally normal except that little piece that is constantly scheming where my next opiates are coming from. They don’t even make me high, they just make me feel ‘normal’, so what’s the point? I want to be free of this.”

For people in pain, there’s an added risk to poppy seeds. A recent study found that consuming just few seeds in a muffin or bagel could result in a positive drug test – a finding that could get a patient taken off opioids or dismissed by their doctor.

The Inside Story of Elvis Presley’s Death

By Donna Gregory Burch

When Elvis Presley first hit the music scene during the 1950s, he was both beloved and vilified for the hip-thrusting, leg-shaking and gyrating that changed the art form of musical performance forever.

But what many don’t realize is that Presley’s ability to do those iconic dance moves came with a cost and may have actually contributed to his sudden death in 1977 at the age of 42.

In a new book entitled “The Strange Medical Saga of Elvis Presley,” Dr. Forest Tennant, a retired physician who specialized in pain medicine and addiction treatment, explores the fascinating medical history of Elvis.

Turns out, it wasn’t all those peanut butter, banana and bacon sandwiches that killed him. But what did?

I recently had a chance to interview Tennant about his latest book and what really caused Elvis’ death.  

Donna Gregory Burch: When I think about Elvis’ death, I recall the rumors that he died while taking a bowel movement on the toilet and that his autopsy revealed a very full colon. Are either of those stories actually true?

Forest Tennant: Yes, they are. We knew about these events [surrounding his death], but we had no scientific or medical explanation as to why they occurred. Fifty years after he dies, we finally have a scientific explanation as to why he died like he did.

What happened to him and why he died so suddenly in the bathroom was … a medical controversy that … ended up in a criminal trial and with all kinds of emotionalism.

Nothing happened to Elvis Presley that we don't have a good logical, scientific explanation for now. But certainly back in those days we didn't.  

You were involved in a court proceeding about Elvis’ death. Could you tell me about that and what role you served during the lawsuit?

Well, what happened was that because he died suddenly and because the pathologists couldn't agree on why he died, and because Elvis was found to be abusing drugs as well as being prescribed a lot of drugs, a criminal trial was brought against his physician (Dr. George Nichopoulos).

The attorney that decided to defend (Nichopoulos) was a man by the name of James Neal, who was a federal prosecutor who prosecuted Jimmy Hoffa and the offenders in the Watergate scandal, and so he was the nation's top attorney at that time. He investigated the case and found out that the doctor that treated Elvis Presley was not a criminal at all and was doing his best to help him.

Some dozen physicians at the Baptist hospital in Memphis saw Elvis Presley, but nobody knew what was the matter with him. They knew he had some kind of mysterious, systemic disease, which is a disease that can affect multiple organs at the same time.

He was a baffling medical case for the doctors in Memphis at that time, and we didn't know what he had up until about three or four years ago. We did not understand the genetic collagen connective tissue disorders, now usually referred to by doctors as Ehlers Danlos syndrome (EDS). Nobody understood that his glaucoma and his colon [issues] were connected [due to EDS]. They knew it was connected somehow but they didn't have an explanation for it at that time.

What do we know today about why Elvis died that we could not explain back when he actually passed away?

He had a severe heart problem.

Elvis’ heart problem was directly tied to his diet, right? I mean he was well-known for his fat and sugar-laden diet.

Yes, his diet was part of it, but his autoimmunity also affected his heart.

But the major controversy of the day is one that's maybe a little hard for the public to understand. A drug overdose in 1977 was said to only occur if the lungs filled up with fluid. He had no fluid in his lungs, so the only thing that he had at his autopsy of any significance was a huge heart. And so the pathologist and the county medical examiner said he had to have died of a heart attack because his heart was so bad.

The catch was that he had about 11 drugs in his bloodstream. The highest level was codeine, so there became a dispute among the doctors. A certain group of pathologists who were highly qualified said he died of a heart problem. Another group of highly qualified physicians who were called forensic pathologists said no, he died of his drugs. Up until about two or three or four years ago, the argument was still going on.

Now, I hate to say thanks to the opioid crisis, but because of the overdose deaths that have occurred in recent years, a lot of studies have been done, and enzymes have been discovered, and metabolism has been discovered showing that drugs like codeine can cause a certain heart stoppage without having pulmonary edema (fluid filling the lungs].

It turns out that 24 hours before he died, a dentist gave him codeine. He was already thought to be allergic to it anyway, and that was because he had all these metabolic defects due to his genetics, and so the codeine built up in his system. He had this terrible heart, so he died suddenly, within seconds, as he was trying to sit on the commode. He fell forward.

There is a forensic pathologist, the best one of the day, called Dr. Joseph Davis, and in about 1997, he described exactly, second by second, what happened to Elvis in the bathroom. But the cause is pretty clear: He took the codeine, and it caused a cardiac arrhythmia. If he had a good heart, he might have survived, but he had a bad heart.

So, it’s really a combination. You had these two sides of doctors arguing – they even ended up in a criminal trial – but it turns out that they were both right. It was a combination of a terrible heart and a drug that causes cardiac arrhythmia, and that's why he died with no pulmonary edema.

So many times in the medical community, we always look for that one cause, right? His case is very illustrative. Because the body is so complex, it's often multiple factors that are causing health issues.

Elvis Presley had multiple diseases. He was terribly ill, and he died accidentally in some ways with a dentist giving him codeine for his bad tooth, and his bad teeth were also part of the same disease that gave him a bad colon and a bad eye and a bad liver. They were all connected.

EDS is what connects all of those health problems, correct?

Yes, scientifically, EDS is a genetic connective tissue collagen disorder, and what that means is that you are genetically predetermined to have your collagen in certain tissues either disappear or deteriorate or become defective, and to put it bluntly, you can have a rectal problem and an eye problem at the same time due to the same cause because your collagen is deteriorating in these tissues, and you were programmed to develop this when you are born. It is a major cause of the intractable pain syndrome.

Now some of the diseases are very mild. You have a little double jointedness, and your skin is a little lax, and you might develop some arthritis, but you become a good gymnast in the Olympics or you become a good football player in some of the mild cases. But if you get a severe case like Elvis Presley, your life is going to be very miserable, and you're going to die young unless you get vigorous treatments, which are being developed right now.

I don't think EDS was even recognized back when Elvis was living, was it? It wasn't even a known diagnosis. Not many people even know about it today.

No, Dr. Peter Beighton didn't even come up with the (diagnostic screening tool for EDS) until long after Elvis Presley died.

As amazing as it may seem, I'm the only person in the United States who had the autopsies of both Elvis Presley and [aviator and businessman] Howard Hughes and their medical records, and was able to interview their physicians who took care of them. So I felt obligated to put these into books. I don't care whether anybody buys the books or not, but I do think these cases are marvelous cases, and I think these are icons and heroes of the last century, and somebody needed to write it down, and I'm the only one who had the material.

And you know something? For 50 years nobody cared that I had them. Maybe they still don't, but I've got them in the books now, so it'll be recorded for posterity, and that was my goal … to make sure that history is recorded.

Was EDS responsible for the way Elvis was able to move and dance?

Yes, we've got some pictures in the book, and I think we put the question in there. Can you hold these positions and sing and hold a microphone at the same time? And of course, [most people] can't. [EDS was] why he was able to do those things.

But on the other hand, we [recently had] the Olympics, and some of those Olympic [athletes] couldn't possibly do this if they didn't have these hypermobile joints. Whether they will develop the disease in later life is unknown.

When you're young, and you have these joints that are hyperextended, you can do things that other people can't do.

In your recent book about Howard Hughes’ medical issues, you had written about how Hughes was still very successful in life despite the fact he was in an enormous amount of chronic pain due to his medical conditions. Elvis was in the same predicament, wasn’t he?

Very much so, and I'm hoping that people who have intractable pain syndrome, who have EDS, complex regional pain syndrome, autoimmune diseases and traumatic brain injuries, read these books or at least hear about the books, and get some hope and realize that here are two men who did great things in very disparate fields but were terribly ill. I've had many, many patients who read about Howard Hughes tell me that he was an inspiration to them.

Elvis was in a great deal of chronic pain as a result of his EDS. Is that what led to his addiction to opioids?

Yes, we will never quite know how much of the drug taking that Elvis was doing was him self-treating his medical condition and how much of it was just abuse, but that's just the way it is. You can't quantitate it.

I was actually asked to deal with both of these cases because, back in the 1970s, I was trying to deal with patients who appeared to abuse opioids and other drugs and also had legitimate pain, and that's how I got involved with these cases.

It's an issue to this day, and society can't deal with it. They just refuse to talk about it, refuse to deal with it. You've got one group of doctors who just want to treat the addiction. You've got another group who just want to treat the pain, but you've really got to treat some of both and have doctors who understand both, but at this point in time, it's not happening.

I would love to see these books bring about some rational discussions about opioids and about pain and addiction, but I don't see it happening. I see nothing but controversy, accusation, falsehoods, fabrications. Society and the media can't seem to have rational discussions anymore about these issues, unfortunately.

I think with all of Elvis’ health issues and his subsequent drug addiction, it was almost like the perfect storm, right? He has EDS that's causing him extreme pain. The doctors give him pain medications to try to remedy that, so he can actually perform on stage, but then he’s still not able to perform up to the standards of his fans because of his addiction to those drugs.

He was really in a damned if you do, damned if you don’t predicament.

Yes. Also, these drugs probably caused him to have a terrible traumatic brain injury. We couldn't document it, but I suspect that's what happened. He did have a terrible traumatic brain injury, which accelerated all his other problems.

Yes. Apparently, he had fallen in a bathroom and had injured his head, and that was part of what was going on with him in the last years of his life as well.

Yes, it sure was. So again as you pointed out, it was the perfect storm. That's exactly what happened.

You know what I think is so interesting about these two books that you've written? We as the public have this view of Howard Hughes that he was a recluse because he was eccentric and that was just part of his personality. But he was actually really suffering a great deal from chronic pain.

And it's the same situation with Elvis. When we think about his death, we think he was just a drug addict who took too many pills one night, fell off the toilet and died, right? But Elvis was also living with extreme pain and suffering, and he was likely just trying to medicate himself out of that misery.

In our research studies, I saw four people yesterday who have EDS as well as spinal canal problems, and they're just miserable. I sometimes don't know how Elvis and Howard Hughes and the people I hear from daily, I don't know how they make it, you know? I marvel at it.

I'm hoping that everybody who's got intractable pain syndrome or EDS or traumatic brain injuries reads these books. That's who they're written for.

Why did you think it was important to write for those audiences?

I think that the audiences that we deal with are terribly neglected in society. I hate to say it, but I think people who have intractable pain are disdained by a great segment of the population. They're ignored by the political structure, neglected by the medical profession. I hate to say it, but the people we deal with, somebody has got to look after them.

My wife and I… we've managed to put together a foundation and use our business successes to try to help people, and I think that's not normal either. My study of the best physicians over time have been doctors who stepped up to the plate for people who needed it because nobody else in society is going to.

I feel sorry for all the groups that have been out lobbying their legislators, their politicians, their medical boards, and they get deaf ears. They get nothing but yes, yes, yes, but then nothing happens. The medical profession we have, it doesn't stand up for people with intractable pain syndrome or EDS, and that is because a huge part of the medical profession is based on treating well people or simple problems.

And so these are people in society who are disdained, neglected and abused, and are put in the corner by huge segments of not only society at large and the government, but also by the medical profession itself.

Yes, I understand exactly what you're saying. I've encountered it myself as a chronic pain patient.

I bet you do.

Any final thoughts?

I have read I don’t know how many books on Howard Hughes and Elvis Presley, and almost all of them are antagonistic. They are hostile. They blame somebody. They are looking for something that's bad, okay?

And I don't know whether it's the authors. I don't know whether it's their publishers. I can't tell you, except I know one thing: In my review of Howard Hughes and Elvis Presley, and like I say, I'm the last person who knew their doctors and had any real contact with their physicians and even the media, I don't see all this negativism.

I think people as a group try to deal with the Elvis affair legitimately, honestly and with care, and the idea that somebody should be blamed, somebody should be bad-mouthed, it's just not there.

These are great stories. They're tragic stories, but I think there are an awful lot of positive, really good things that happened to these men and to people who were around them, so I don't think we're going to get anywhere dealing with some of these issues with just total negativism.

And I think the whole situation, if you read it, is somewhat uplifting and motivating. We are here to try to help our fellow man and women have better lives, and I think there's a lot of that in both of these men.

Donna Gregory Burch was diagnosed with fibromyalgia after several years of unexplained pain, fatigue and other symptoms. She was later diagnosed with chronic Lyme disease. Donna covers news, treatments, research and practical tips for living better with fibromyalgia and Lyme on her blog, FedUpwithFatigue.com. You can also find her on Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest.

All proceeds from sales of “The Strange Medical Saga of Elvis Presley” will go the Tennant Foundation, which gives financial support to Pain News Network and sponsors PNN’s Patient Resources section.

It’s Time for People in Pain To Be Heard

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

I just had my second “there's an issue with filling your codeine prescription” incident.

I have been on codeine, on and off, for over 30 years. Initially, I was allowed refills. When that was no longer permitted, my doctor gave me a new prescription, each and every month, for 120 pills.

When my trigeminal neuralgia pain became somewhat better as a result of various surgeries, I often took only 1 or 2 pills per day.

I am now about 90% housebound. Part of it is due to Covid, but mostly it’s because I do not want to go out and make the baseline pain worse. As a result, some days I take no codeine at all. My last prescription was for 120 pills. It was a month’s supply that lasted for 9 months.

The first incident was last year, when my pain management doctor decided, without discussing it with me, that he was no longer writing scripts for 120 codeine pills a month. Instead, he changed it to 10 pills a month.

I was told he didn’t like me having extra pills, a nonsensical excuse as I had no history of giving them away or taking too many. Prescriptions for 120 pills just made it easier for everyone, including the insurance company, since they would be paying less for fewer doctor appointments.

Fortunately, I was able to go to my family doctor, who had no problem writing for 120 pills. They trusted me there, knowing I would not abuse them.

But when I took the script to the pharmacy, I was told, “We can only fill a 7-day supply per your insurance company.”

The worst part about that was not that I would have to repeatedly go back to the pharmacy, but that the cost for each 7-day supply was much more for me out-of-pocket than if they just filled the whole prescription at once.

My Physician Assistant called the insurance company to ask for a pre-authorization. This would allow the pharmacy to fill the entire amount at one time. They immediately allowed it for the next 12 months, which seemed odd.

If they think I should only be getting a 7-day supply, then why allow the whole script to be filled for an entire year? Either I am untrustworthy or I'm not.

I am lucky. I don’t rely on daily opioids to get me out of bed, go to the store or be able to work. So many of us have no other option but to take them. My annoyance is tame compared to what other patients go through, who have been unable to get what they need due to restrictions on prescribing.

Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing (PROP) recently sent a letter to the AMA saying the organization shouldn’t be calling for changes in the CDC opioid guideline, even though far more people are dying from street drugs than prescription opioids.

“Medically prescribed opioids remain a common gateway to illicit opioid use and are themselves frequent causes of opioid addiction and overdose, even if illicit opioids currently cause the greater number of deaths,” PROP said.

PROP founder Dr. Andrew Kolodny even said that prescriptions “still have a very long way to go” and should be reduced even further.

PROP’s reach is loud and strong. We complain so much to each other, patient support groups, Twitter and other social media about how awful this is, how unfair and inhumane.

A number of people have started online petitions to send to the FDA or CDC, asking that the guidelines be changed so they stop hurting chronic pain patients. Many say, “This is a great idea.” Yet few actually sign.

Nothing will change if we don’t band together and make our voices heard. The call keeps going out, “Something must be done!” But too often the answer is, “Oh yes, somebody must do something. But I'm too busy.”

Whispering in the wind won’t help. It is long past time for us to become a true force, with a voice that is louder and stronger than PROP’s. 

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.”  Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

How Poppy Seed Muffins Could Get You Flagged by a Drug Test

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

If you’re a patient who is prescribed opioid pain medication, you may have been warned not to eat poppy seed muffins or bagels before a drug test.

The tiny black seeds may contain trace amounts of morphine and codeine, which can be detected in a drug screen and wreak havoc with your medical care. A positive test could result in your doctor taking you off opioid medication or even dropping you as a patient.

Is the poppy seed warning accurate or just an urban myth? A group of researchers wanted to find out, so they ran a series of tests to measure opiate levels in commercially available poppy seeds. They washed, steamed and heated the seeds to see how that changed concentrations of three opium alkaloids: morphine, codeine and thebaine.

Washing or soaking the poppy seeds in water significantly reduced the presence of all three opium alkaloids. So did heating the seeds at a temperature of 392 F for at least 40 minutes.

However, baking the seeds in a muffin for 16 minutes at 392 F didn't significantly change the opium alkaloids, possibly because the internal and external temperatures of the muffins reached only 211 F and 277 F, respectively.

“Baking had no significant effect on concentrations of opium alkaloids. Overall, these results indicate that opium alkaloids may not be significantly affected by baking or steam application and that poppy seeds may require water washing or extended thermal treatment to promote reduction of these compounds,” said lead author Benjamin Redan, PhD, a research chemist who works in the FDA’s Institute for Food Safety and Health.

Redan says poppy seed muffins would have to be baked for at least two hours just to reduce morphine and codeine levels by 50 percent – which is not a recipe for passing a drug test or for baking tasty muffins.

The findings were recently published in the American Chemical Society’s Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

Poppy Seed Tea

Researchers and law enforcement agencies have been paying more attention to the lowly poppy seed because of anecdotal reports of people using the seeds to brew a potent tea that can be used for pain relief or to get high.

Late last year, Drug Enforcement Administration classified unwashed poppy seeds as a Schedule II controlled substance. While the poppy plant has long been classified as an illegal substance, the unwashed seeds were exempt because they were not perceived as a problem until recently.

“Individuals wishing to extract the opium alkaloid content from unwashed poppy seeds, use the seeds to create a tea, which contains sufficient amounts of alkaloids to produce psychoactive effects,” the DEA said. “Unwashed poppy seeds are a danger to the user and their abuse may result in unpredictable outcomes including death.”

The Internet is filled with stories about people experimenting with poppy seed tea. One alternative health website even has a recipe for making poppy seed tea that comes with a stark warning.

“Unfortunately, the abuse of or having insufficient knowledge about this tea has led to a few fatal incidences,” the recipe warns.

A Pained Life: Who Benefits From the Opioid Crisis?

By Carol Levy, PNN Columnist

For the first time in almost 40 years, I have to fight to get my codeine prescription filled.

I understand intellectually what so many pain patients have said about the frustration, upset and upheaval they experience when a pharmacist refuses to fill their prescription or insurance refuses to pay for it. Or harder still, what they go through having their opioid medications cut down or stopped completely.

But I did not understand the emotional side of it until it happened to me.

The insurance company refused to pay for my codeine prescription. They had no problem filling it for the last many, many years but suddenly they need "authorization" from the doctor. How does that make sense? Writing the prescription was authorizing. Why do they need to add a second permission?

It is now over three weeks. The pharmacist tells me they have contacted the doctor's office three times: "You need to call them and find out why they haven't responded."

When I call the office, they tell me the pharmacy never sent over the forms they need.

So I call the pharmacy back. They recite a fax number for the doctor’s office. It is not the right number. I give them the number the doctor's office just gave me. “We'll try it again right now,” she says.

I keep my fingers crossed and hope I don't run out of pills before it is resolved — if it is resolved.

The pharmacy clerk and I talked the day the prescription was refused by the insurance company. I was venting my frustration over not being able to get the prescription filled, especially because it is the same prescription I have had for years, one that was always covered by my insurance.

To my surprise she says: "It is not just narcotics. Many insurance companies are refusing to cover or making unwarranted demands, requiring many more hoops to jump through. They have refused to cover certain creams and hormones, other prescriptions, non-narcotics that are routinely given and, until now, paid for by the insurance companies."

This is appalling. And makes no sense.  

But then I start thinking about it and was struck by a thought: Yes, there is an opioid crisis. And we’ve all heard the reasons they blamed patients for the “crisis.”  But I think there may be another factor at play: the profit margin.

After all, if we pay insurance premiums but they refuse to pay for our medication -- forcing some folks to pay cash rather than wait for all the rigamarole to be completed -- then the insurance company comes out way ahead. They get our monthly fees and work to make sure we get as little as possible in return. 

I hope I am merely being paranoid. But somehow, I doubt it.

Carol Jay Levy has lived with trigeminal neuralgia, a chronic facial pain disorder, for over 30 years. She is the author of “A Pained Life, A Chronic Pain Journey.” 

Carol is the moderator of the Facebook support group “Women in Pain Awareness.” Her blog “The Pained Life” can be found here.

The information in this column should not be considered as professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. It is for informational purposes only and represent the author’s opinions alone. It does not inherently express or reflect the views, opinions and/or positions of Pain News Network.

FDA: Opioid Cold Meds Too Risky for Kids

By Pat Anson, Editor

The Food and Drug Administration has ordered stronger warning labels for cough and cold medications containing opioids and said they should no longer be prescribed to patients younger than 18. The agency also signaled it that it could enact new limits on the dose and duration of other types of opioid prescriptions.

“Given the epidemic of opioid addiction, we’re concerned about unnecessary exposure to opioids, especially in young children. We know that any exposure to opioid drugs can lead to future addiction,” said FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb, MD. “It’s become clear that the use of prescription, opioid-containing medicines to treat cough and cold in children comes with serious risks that don’t justify their use in this vulnerable population.”

The FDA action involves nine different types of cough and cold medicines, four of which contain codeine and five that have hydrocodone. The brand names include Tuxarin ER, Tuzistra XR, Triacin C, FlowTuss and Zutripro. Several of the medications also come in generic form.

The FDA said it conducted an extensive review of the products and convened a panel of pediatric experts, who said the risk of misuse, abuse and addiction outweighed the benefits in patients younger than 18.

“These products will no longer be indicated for use in children, and their use in this age group is not recommended.  Health care professionals should reassure parents that cough due to a cold or upper respiratory infection is self-limited and generally does not need to be treated.  For those children in whom cough treatment is necessary, alternative medicines are available,” the FDA said in a statement.

The agency also ordered stronger “Black Box” warning labels on opioid cough and cold medicines to make them more consistent with safety warnings that come with opioid pain medications.

‘Too Many People Prescribed Opioids’

The FDA this week also released its 2018 Strategic Policy Roadmap, which outlines four priority areas in the year ahead.

The agency's first goal is to reduce the abuse of opioid medication. The FDA said opioid addiction and overdoses were claiming lives at a “staggering rate” of 91 deaths every day – although it failed to point out that most of those deaths involve illegal opioids such as heroin and illicit fentanyl, not prescription pain medication. Also unmentioned in the “roadmap” is that opioid prescriptions have been declining since 2010.

“Too many people are being inappropriately prescribed opioid drugs. When these prescriptions are written, they are often for long durations of use that create too much opportunity for addiction to develop,” the FDA said.

“We need to take steps to reduce exposure to opioid drugs by helping to make sure that patients are prescribed these drugs only when properly indicated, and that when prescriptions are written, they are for dosages and durations of use that comport closely with the purpose of the prescription.” 

Several states have already enacted limits on opioid prescriptions for acute, short term pain. Minnesota, for example, recently adopted strict new guidelines that limit the initial supply of opioids for acute pain to just three days. 

FDA Bans Use of Codeine and Tramadol in Children

By Pat Anson, Editor

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is tightening restrictions on the use of codeine and tramadol in young children.

The agency says the opioid medications carry "serious risks" for children under the age of 12, including slowed or difficult breathing and possibly even death. The FDA is also recommending against the use of codeine and tramadol by breastfeeding mothers due to possible harm to their infants.

Codeine is approved to treat mild pain and cough, while tramadol is used to treat moderate pain. Codeine is usually combined with other medicines, such as acetaminophen, in prescription pain medication, as well as in some over-the-counter (OTC) cough and cold remedies. The FDA action only applies to prescription codeine.

"We know that some children who received codeine or tramadol have experienced life-threatening respiratory depression and death because they metabolize these medicines much faster than usual, casing dangerously high levels of active drug in their bodies," said Doug Throckmorton, MD, deputy director for regulatory programs, at the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

"This is especially concerning in children under 12 years of age and adolescents who are obese or have conditions that may increase the risk of breathing problems, like obstructive sleep apnea or lung disease. Respiratory depression can also occur in nursing babies, when mothers who are ultra-rapid metabolizers take these types of medicines and pass it along to their children through their breast milk."

In a review of adverse event reports from 1969 to 2015, the FDA said it identified 64 cases of serious breathing problems, including 24 deaths, with codeine-containing medicines in children younger than 18. The agency also identified nine cases of serious breathing problems, including three deaths, with the use of tramadol by children.

The majority of serious side effects with both codeine and tramadol occurred in children younger than 12, and some cases occurred after a single dose.

The FDA is requiring drug makers to add a tougher warning to the labels of codeine and tramadol products, alerting healthcare providers and parents that codeine should not be used to treat pain or cough and tramadol should not be used to treat pain in children younger than 12.

The new labeling also cautions against their use in adolescents between 12 and 18 who are obese or have conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea or severe lung disease. Breastfeeding mothers will also be warned not to use the medications.

The FDA said it is considering additional regulatory action for the OTC codeine products that are available in some states. It is also considering an FDA Advisory Committee meeting to discuss the role of prescription opioid cough-and-cold medicines, including codeine, to treat cough in children.

The agency did not recommend or suggest any alternatives to codeine and tramadol to treat childrens' cough or pain. OTC medicines such as acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) also have risks and side effects.

"We understand that there are limited options when it comes to treating pain or cough in children, and that these changes may raise some questions for health care providers and parents. However, please know that our decision today was made based on the latest evidence and with this goal in mind: keeping our kids safe," said Throckmorton.

In 2015, the FDA approved the use of OxyContin in children ages 11 to 16  who are in severe pain, a move widely panned by addiction treatment activists who claimed kids would get easily hooked on the painkiller.