More Data Needed on Covid Vaccine Safety for High-Risk People

By Roger Chriss, PNN Columnist

The Covid-19 vaccine rollout in the U.S. hasn’t been so smooth or fast. Fortunately, however, the vaccines are proving to be generally very safe. But there have been some serious allergic reactions associated with the vaccines. And in a few tragic cases, there have been deaths.

As a result, it is worth looking closely at what is now known about vaccine safety, in particular for high-risk people such as the elderly and those with compromised immune systems.

On January 3, Florida physician Gregory Michael died 18 days after receiving the first dose of Pfizer's vaccine. He was an otherwise healthy adult who developed acute thrombocytopenia, a severe shortage of platelets, soon after being vaccinated. Michael ultimately died of a brain hemorrhage after a two-week effort to raise his platelet count.

This is the only known case of a platelet crisis after vaccination, but it’s not yet clear if the two are connected. Work to understand what happened is ongoing.

“I don’t know what this is. We’ll keep our eyes open and see if it happens to anybody else,” vaccine expert Paul Offit, MD, told The New York Times.

The Platelet Disorder Support Association released a statement calling Michael’s death “tragic and concerning,” but said patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) “should not be hesitant to be vaccinated.”

“The relationship between the occurrence of severe thrombocytopenia and the vaccination, if any, is uncertain. To our knowledge, this is the first such event reported after over 5 million such vaccinations. Based on the available data, the benefit to risk ratio strongly favors vaccination of all adults, including those with ITP,” the statement said.

There have been a few other deaths worldwide. The Jerusalem Post reported in December on the death of an 88-year-old man who died just hours after being vaccinated, and a 75-year-old who died of a heart attack shortly after getting a shot. Both cases are seen as coincidental and no further deaths have been reported as Israel continues to vaccinate its population.

Norway, however, has seen 29 elderly people die after being vaccinated, all of them over the age of 75. The deaths prompted Norway to suggest that Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill.

“For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences. For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant,” the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said in a statement.

Information about vaccine safety for higher-risk populations is not easy to get at present. For instance, there is as yet no clinical data on what vaccine risks may exist for women who are pregnant or lactating. Without that data, STAT News says “it’s impossible for any organization or expert to say with absolute certainty that there are no risks.”

As of today, over 60 million doses of vaccine have been given worldwide and nearly 20 million in the U.S. Based on the small number of severe adverse events seen so far, this means that the vaccines are extremely safe for the vast majority of people.

Norway and Israel are reporting side effects and outcomes faster than most other nations. Consequently, the recent deaths may be nothing more than an artifact of good public health statistics offering a complete picture of all risks.

But precautions for people who are elderly, frail or otherwise high risk may turn out to be justified. As more data from vaccination efforts worldwide comes in, the risks will be better understood.

Roger Chriss suffers from Ehlers Danlos syndrome and is a proud member of the Ehlers-Danlos Society. Roger is a technical consultant in Washington state, where he specializes in mathematics and research.

What to Expect When COVID Vaccines Roll Out

By Judith Graham, Kaiser Health News

Vaccines that protect against COVID-19 are on the way. What should older adults and people with chronic illness expect? Will there be enough doses for everyone who wants to be vaccinated?

The first vaccine candidates, from Pfizer and Moderna, could arrive before Christmas, according to Alex Azar, who heads the Department of Health and Human Services.

Both vaccines are notably effective in preventing illness due to the coronavirus, according to information released by the companies, although much of the data from clinical trials is still to come. Both have been tested in adults age 65 and older, who mounted a strong immune response.

Seniors in nursing homes and assisted living centers will be among the first Americans vaccinated, following recommendations last week by a federal advisory panel. Older adults living at home will need to wait a while longer.

Many uncertainties remain. Among them: What side effects can older adults anticipate and how often will these occur? Will the vaccines offer meaningful protection to seniors who are frail or have multiple chronic illnesses?

Here’s a look at what’s known, what’s not and what lies ahead.

Timetable for Vaccines

Pfizer’s vaccine will be evaluated by a 15-member Food and Drug Administration advisory panel on Thursday. Moderna’s vaccine is expected to go before the panel Dec. 17.

At least two days before each meeting, an analysis by FDA staff will be made public. This will be the first opportunity to see extensive data about the vaccines’ performance in large phase 3 clinical trials, including more details about their impact on older adults.

So far, summary results disclosed in news releases indicate that Pfizer’s vaccine, produced in partnership with BioNTech, has an overall efficacy rate of 95% and efficacy of 94% in people 65 and older. Moderna’s overall efficacy is 94%, with 87% efficacy in preventing moderate disease in older adults, according to Moncef Slaoui, chief science adviser to Operation Warp Speed, the government’s COVID-19 vaccine development program.

If the advisory panel gives a green light, the FDA will decide within days or weeks whether to authorize the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for emergency use. Distribution of the vaccine has already begun, and health care providers are expected to begin administering it immediately after the FDA acts.

Who Gets Vaccinated First?

At a Dec. 1 meeting of the Advisory Commission on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which guides the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccines, experts recommended that people living in long-term care (primarily nursing homes and assisted living facilities) and health care workers be the first groups to get COVID-19 vaccines.

This recognizes the extraordinary burden of COVID-19 in long-term care facilities. Although their residents represent fewer than 1% of the U.S. population, they account for 40% of COVID deaths — more than 100,000 deaths to date.

The commission’s decision comes despite a lack of evidence that Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines are effective and safe for frail, vulnerable seniors in long-term care. Vaccines were not tested in this population. Federal officials insist side effects will be carefully monitored.

Next in line likely would be essential workers who cannot work from home, such as police, firefighters, teachers and people employed in food processing and transportation, according to commission deliberations Nov. 23 that have not come to a formal vote.

Then would be adults with high-risk medical conditions such as diabetes, cancer, kidney disease, obesity, heart disease and autoimmune diseases and all adults age 65 and older.

Although states typically follow ACIP guidelines, some states may choose, for instance, to vaccinate high-risk older adults before some categories of essential workers.

Left off the list are family caregivers, who provide essential support to vulnerable older adults living in the community — an unpaid workforce of tens of millions of people. “If someone is providing day-to-day care, it makes sense they should have access to the vaccine, too, to keep everyone safe,” said Beth Kallmyer, vice president of care and support for the Alzheimer’s Association.

Priority Groups

The priority groups constitute nearly half of the U.S. population — 21 million health care workers, 3 million long-term care residents, 66 million essential workers, more than 100 million adults with high-risk conditions and 53 million adults age 65 and older.

With initial supplies of vaccines limited, setting priorities will be inevitable. Practically, this means that hospitals and physicians may try to identify older adults who are at the highest risk of becoming seriously ill from COVID-19 and offer them vaccines before other seniors.

A study of more than 500,000 Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older provides new evidence that could influence these assessments. It found the conditions that most increase older adults’ chances of dying from COVID-19 are sickle cell disease, chronic kidney disease, leukemias and lymphomas, heart failure, diabetes, cerebral palsy, obesity, lung cancer and heart attacks, in that order.

“Out of all Medicare beneficiaries, we identified just under 2,500 who had no medical problems and died of COVID-19,” said Dr. Martin Makary, co-author of the study and a professor of health policy and management at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore. “We knew risk was skewed toward comorbidity [multiple underlying medical conditions], but we didn’t realize it skewed this much.”

Supplies Available

Both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two doses, administered three to four weeks apart. The companies have said about 40 million doses of their vaccines should be available this year, enough to fully vaccinate about 20 million people.

After that, 50 million doses might become available in January, followed by 60 million doses in both February and March, according to Dr. Larry Corey, a virologist who heads the COVID-19 Prevention Trials Network.

That translates into enough vaccine for another 85 million people and should be sufficient to vaccinate older adults in addition to medical personnel on the front lines and many other at-risk individuals, Corey suggested at a recent panel on COVID-19 sponsored by the National Academy of Medicine and American Public Health Association.

He acknowledged these were estimates, based on information he has been given. Pfizer and Moderna have not yet specified how much vaccine will be delivered and when. Nor is it clear when other vaccines under investigation will become available — 13 are in phase 3 clinical trials — or what their monthly production capacity might be.

Distribution Issues

As Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines are rolled out, a very vulnerable group may have difficulty getting them: 2 million seniors who are homebound and another 5.3 million with physical impairments who have problems getting around.

The reason: handling and cold storage requirements.

Pfizer’s vaccine needs to be stored at minus 70 degrees Celsius, calling for special equipment not available in small hospitals, clinics or doctors’ offices. Moderna’s vaccine needs long-term storage at minus 20 degrees Celsius.

Landmark Health provides in-home medical care to more than 120,000 frail, chronically ill homebound seniors in 15 states. “We don’t have the capabilities to store and distribute these vaccines to our population,” said Dr. Michael Le, the company’s co-founder and chief medical officer.

Instead, he said, Landmark is working to arrange transportation for its patients to centers where COVID-19 vaccines will be administered and educating them about the benefits of the vaccines. “Given the trust, the bond we have with our patients, we can play a big role as advocates,” Le said.

Addressing Mistrust

Advocates have a big job ahead of them. According to a recent poll from the University of Michigan, only 58% of older adults (ages 50 to 80) said they were very or somewhat likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine. A significant number of older adults, 46%, thought they’d get the vaccine eventually but wanted others to go first. Only 20% wanted to get it as soon as possible.

Most important in making decisions is knowing how well the vaccine works, according to 80% of the 1,556 older adults surveyed. Just over half (52%) said a recommendation from their doctor would be influential.

Dr. Sharon Inouye, a geriatrician at Hebrew Senior Life in Boston and a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, is among the physicians impatiently awaiting the publication of data from Pfizer’s and Moderna’s phase 3 clinical trials.

Among the things she wants to know: How many older adults with chronic health conditions participated? How many participants were 75 and older? Did side effects differ for older adults?

“What I worry about most is the side effects,” she said. “We may not be able to know about serious but rare side effects until millions of people take them.”

But that’s a gamble she’s willing to take. Not only will Inouye get a vaccine, she just told her 91-year-old mother, who lives in assisted living, to say “yes” when one is offered.

“My whole family lives in fear that something will happen to her every day,” Inouye said. “Even though there’s a lot we still don’t know about these vaccines, it’s compelling that we protect people from this overwhelming illness.”

Kaiser Health News (KHN) is a national health policy news service. It is an editorially independent program of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation which is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Grin and Bear It: Why Smiling Makes Vaccine Shots Less Painful

By Pat Anson, PNN Editor

Over the next few months, tens of millions of people around the world will be getting the first injections of COVID-19 vaccines, with some getting a vaccine that requires two shots to be effective.

Whether it’s a shot for the flu, pneumonia, shingles or COVID, no one looks forward to stabbing pain from the oversized needles often used in vaccinations. Is there anything you can do to help relieve the sting from a needle prick?

An unusual study led by researchers at the University of California, Irvine, found an unexpected way to dull the pain: Put a big smile on your face.

Researchers say that a broad smile -- one that elevates the corners of the mouth and creates crow's feet around the eyes -- can reduce the pain of a needle injection by as much as 40 percent. That genuine smile, known as a Duchenne smile, can also lower your stress and heart rate during a needle injection.

If you find the idea of smiling during an injection a little silly, then feel free to grimace instead. Grimacing uses the same facial muscles as smiling and is just as effective at pain relief, according to researchers.

"When facing distress or pleasure, humans make remarkably similar facial expressions that involve activation of the eye muscles, lifting of the cheeks and baring of the teeth," says lead investigator Sarah Pressman, PhD, a professor of psychological science at UCI. "We found that these movements, as opposed to a neutral expression, are beneficial in reducing discomfort and stress."

To test their theory, Pressman and her colleagues found 231 healthy volunteers who self-reported their levels of pain, emotion and distress while being injected in the upper arm with saline from a 25-gauge needle — the type often used in a flu shot.

Before and during the injection, participants were randomly selected to use either a Duchenne smile, a small smile, a grimace or a neutral expression. All four facial expressions were facilitated by holding chopsticks in their teeth.

Those in the Duchenne smile and grimace groups reported 40% and 39% less pain, respectively, during the injection than the neutral group, while participants in the small smile group had 26% less pain.

The Duchenne smile and grimace groups (images C and D) were also associated with slightly lower stress and heart rates.

smilingsince.jpg

“Why did these two disparate expressions perform so similarly? As discussed previously, this overlap could be explained by the fact that similar muscle groups are activated in both expressions,” researchers reported in the journal Emotion.

“Grimacing has long been used as a nonverbal indicator of pain and has been manipulated unintentionally via common medical practices from the Middle Ages that tell individuals to ‘bite down’ on pieces of wood and leather during painful procedures. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental test showing that this natural response to pain is helpful in improving the subjective pain experience.”

The researchers aren’t suggesting a return to the Middle Ages or that you bite down on chopsticks the next time you’re vaccinated. But they do think that “device-in-mouth manipulation” and “creative paradigms to manipulate facial expressions” are worthy of future pain research.     

"Our study demonstrates a simple, free and clinically meaningful method of making the needle injection less awful," Pressman said. "Given the numerous anxiety- and pain-provoking situations found in medical practice, we hope that an understanding of how and when smiling and grimacing helps will foster effective pain reduction strategies that result in better patient experiences."